开源软件与个人医疗设备:通过软件测试评估解读风险

Michael Dorin, H. Mortensen, Sergio Montenegro
{"title":"开源软件与个人医疗设备:通过软件测试评估解读风险","authors":"Michael Dorin, H. Mortensen, Sergio Montenegro","doi":"10.26439/ciis2019.5528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The availability of powerful low-cost hardware and advanced software tools has made open-source medical devices possible. Deciding to use an open-source medical device may require acceptance of some risk. Fully comprehending the risk level is essential since failure of the software or the medical device is dangerous. As many medical applications contain complicated codes, an excellent method for understanding software readiness is to evaluate how much testing has been completed on the software. As a case study, this project evaluates the level of testing performed on software components of the Loop Artificial Pancreas system. Classic methods for evaluating complicated source codes are used to demonstrate how much testing is needed in a project. Our analysis shows that the Loop Artificial Pancreas system (master branch) has been thoroughly tested with most of the faults likely discovered. By using classic software engineering metrics and techniques, it is possible to gauge how completely an open-source medical product has been tested and make an educated decision about the risk associated with using it.","PeriodicalId":365289,"journal":{"name":"Innovando la educación en tecnología. Actas del II Congreso Internacional de Ingeniería de Sistemas","volume":"2377 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open-Source Software & Personal Medical Devices: Interpreting Risk Through an Evaluation of Software Testing\",\"authors\":\"Michael Dorin, H. Mortensen, Sergio Montenegro\",\"doi\":\"10.26439/ciis2019.5528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The availability of powerful low-cost hardware and advanced software tools has made open-source medical devices possible. Deciding to use an open-source medical device may require acceptance of some risk. Fully comprehending the risk level is essential since failure of the software or the medical device is dangerous. As many medical applications contain complicated codes, an excellent method for understanding software readiness is to evaluate how much testing has been completed on the software. As a case study, this project evaluates the level of testing performed on software components of the Loop Artificial Pancreas system. Classic methods for evaluating complicated source codes are used to demonstrate how much testing is needed in a project. Our analysis shows that the Loop Artificial Pancreas system (master branch) has been thoroughly tested with most of the faults likely discovered. By using classic software engineering metrics and techniques, it is possible to gauge how completely an open-source medical product has been tested and make an educated decision about the risk associated with using it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovando la educación en tecnología. Actas del II Congreso Internacional de Ingeniería de Sistemas\",\"volume\":\"2377 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovando la educación en tecnología. Actas del II Congreso Internacional de Ingeniería de Sistemas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26439/ciis2019.5528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovando la educación en tecnología. Actas del II Congreso Internacional de Ingeniería de Sistemas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26439/ciis2019.5528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强大的低成本硬件和先进的软件工具的可用性使得开源医疗设备成为可能。决定使用开源医疗设备可能需要接受一些风险。由于软件或医疗设备的故障是危险的,因此充分了解风险级别至关重要。由于许多医疗应用程序包含复杂的代码,了解软件准备情况的一个很好的方法是评估软件上完成了多少测试。作为一个案例研究,该项目评估了Loop人工胰腺系统软件组件的测试水平。评估复杂源代码的经典方法用于演示项目中需要多少测试。我们的分析表明,环路人工胰腺系统(主分支)已经经过了彻底的测试,大部分故障都可能被发现。通过使用经典的软件工程指标和技术,可以评估开源医疗产品的测试程度,并对使用它的风险做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open-Source Software & Personal Medical Devices: Interpreting Risk Through an Evaluation of Software Testing
The availability of powerful low-cost hardware and advanced software tools has made open-source medical devices possible. Deciding to use an open-source medical device may require acceptance of some risk. Fully comprehending the risk level is essential since failure of the software or the medical device is dangerous. As many medical applications contain complicated codes, an excellent method for understanding software readiness is to evaluate how much testing has been completed on the software. As a case study, this project evaluates the level of testing performed on software components of the Loop Artificial Pancreas system. Classic methods for evaluating complicated source codes are used to demonstrate how much testing is needed in a project. Our analysis shows that the Loop Artificial Pancreas system (master branch) has been thoroughly tested with most of the faults likely discovered. By using classic software engineering metrics and techniques, it is possible to gauge how completely an open-source medical product has been tested and make an educated decision about the risk associated with using it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信