衡量行业间相关性:SIC距离与幸存者原则

Lasse B. Lien, Peter G. Klein
{"title":"衡量行业间相关性:SIC距离与幸存者原则","authors":"Lasse B. Lien, Peter G. Klein","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1139522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional approach to measuring inter-industry relatedness uses the SIC system to capture the \"distance\" between industries. While relatedness measures based on SIC codes (or equivalent classifications) are readily available and easy to compute, they do not screen effectively for the conditions under which related diversification creates value. This paper constructs an alternative, survivor-based measure of inter-industry relatedness and compares it to similar measures based on distances between SIC codes. We find that survivor-based measures consistently outperform SIC-based measures in predicting firms' decisions to enter new markets, even when herding tendencies and motives related to mutual forbearance are taken into account.","PeriodicalId":383948,"journal":{"name":"New Institutional Economics","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Inter-Industry Relatedness: SIC Distances versus the Survivor Principle\",\"authors\":\"Lasse B. Lien, Peter G. Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1139522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The conventional approach to measuring inter-industry relatedness uses the SIC system to capture the \\\"distance\\\" between industries. While relatedness measures based on SIC codes (or equivalent classifications) are readily available and easy to compute, they do not screen effectively for the conditions under which related diversification creates value. This paper constructs an alternative, survivor-based measure of inter-industry relatedness and compares it to similar measures based on distances between SIC codes. We find that survivor-based measures consistently outperform SIC-based measures in predicting firms' decisions to enter new markets, even when herding tendencies and motives related to mutual forbearance are taken into account.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Institutional Economics\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Institutional Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1139522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Institutional Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1139522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

衡量行业间相关性的传统方法使用SIC系统来捕捉行业之间的“距离”。虽然基于SIC代码(或等效分类)的相关性度量很容易获得且易于计算,但它们不能有效地筛选相关多样化创造价值的条件。本文构建了另一种基于幸存者的行业间相关性度量,并将其与基于SIC代码之间距离的类似度量进行了比较。我们发现,即使考虑到与相互容忍相关的羊群倾向和动机,基于幸存者的指标在预测企业进入新市场的决策方面始终优于基于sic的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Inter-Industry Relatedness: SIC Distances versus the Survivor Principle
The conventional approach to measuring inter-industry relatedness uses the SIC system to capture the "distance" between industries. While relatedness measures based on SIC codes (or equivalent classifications) are readily available and easy to compute, they do not screen effectively for the conditions under which related diversification creates value. This paper constructs an alternative, survivor-based measure of inter-industry relatedness and compares it to similar measures based on distances between SIC codes. We find that survivor-based measures consistently outperform SIC-based measures in predicting firms' decisions to enter new markets, even when herding tendencies and motives related to mutual forbearance are taken into account.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信