一次性光纤技术在Marcellus页岩远场通信及压裂性能评价中的应用

M. Mantell, A. Mercer, J. B. Jackson, D. Murphy, J. Conaway, S. Machovoe, J. Stokes, M. Elliott
{"title":"一次性光纤技术在Marcellus页岩远场通信及压裂性能评价中的应用","authors":"M. Mantell, A. Mercer, J. B. Jackson, D. Murphy, J. Conaway, S. Machovoe, J. Stokes, M. Elliott","doi":"10.2118/209148-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The use of fiber-optic-sensing technology for the evaluation of completion efficiency, primary cement sheath integrity, and offset well interference has become more prevalent in recent years. In addition, the use of a fiber-optic cable for microseismic monitoring as opposed to traditional wireline-conveyed geophones was recently introduced. Various fiber deployment methods have been developed over the years to allow operators to make rapid decisions in real-time based on distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), distributed temperature sensing (DTS), and microseismic data, all provided by a small fiber- optic cable deployed in the well and monitored at surface via sophisticated interrogation equipment.\n Historically, fiber-optic cables were deployed in a permanent configuration, strapped to the production casing, in a manner similar to a standard control line, and deployed with the casing prior to cementing. Permanent fiber has become simpler and cost effective over time and provides valuable near wellbore information - and there are continuous developments to keep reducing that cost and complexity. Some operator focus has been less on the monitoring of the completion efficiency metrics and more on understanding the cross well interference data provided from fiber. As a result, operators have looked to other, temporary-type deployment options for fiber.\n Two typical temporary deployments are via coiled-tubing and an armored fiber-optic cable. For the first method, a fiber-optic cable is fed into a coiled-tubing reel and then deployed downhole to monitor the strain when the well is impacted or closely impacted by a hydraulic fracture from an adjacent well. An armored fiber-optic cable deployment is similar to electric wireline in that it is installed in the well during pump down or with a wireline tractor.\n Both these options are viable and readily available; however, they include supplementary expenses in terms of equipment required to convey the fiber into the well. In addition, the surface footprint required during the conveyance and monitoring phases of the operation is substantial with crane(s), a coiled-tubing unit or wireline unit, and associated on-location equipment required during the job. Figure 1 depicts a wireline-conveyed fiber operation in conjunction with fracturing operations. Additional equipment in the form of a wireline truck and extra crane are highlighted in yellow. In contrast, a wellsite where disposable fiber is being deployed is shown in Figure 2. Once the fiber is landed, the pump units are removed and only a trailer and crew pickup remain on-site.\n Figure 1 Typical fracturing operation, wireline-conveyed fiber\n Figure 2 Typical offset well monitoring wellsite, disposable fiber\n This paper will discuss a new, low-cost option now available to conduct cross well monitoring and microseismic evaluation of offset completions using a disposable optical fiber that requires minimal equipment to deploy into the wellbore, reduces surface impact during the operational phase, provides quality strain information with excellent quality microseismic data when compared to other fiber-optic deployment methods, and is able to be disposed of at the conclusion of the operation with no detriments or impediments to the completion of the well it has been deployed in. This fiber was successfully deployed for the first time in the Marcellus Shale for Chesapeake Energy with minimal operational disturbance and reduced costs when compared to similar technologies. It was demonstrated to provide valuable data for the purposes of understanding the impact of hydraulic fracturing on far-field communication and evaluating both the temporal fracture response and zonal impact caused by structural changes across the lateral.","PeriodicalId":262088,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, February 01, 2022","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Disposable Fiber Technology to Evaluate Far-Field Communication and Fracture Performance in the Marcellus Shale\",\"authors\":\"M. Mantell, A. Mercer, J. B. Jackson, D. Murphy, J. Conaway, S. Machovoe, J. Stokes, M. Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/209148-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The use of fiber-optic-sensing technology for the evaluation of completion efficiency, primary cement sheath integrity, and offset well interference has become more prevalent in recent years. In addition, the use of a fiber-optic cable for microseismic monitoring as opposed to traditional wireline-conveyed geophones was recently introduced. Various fiber deployment methods have been developed over the years to allow operators to make rapid decisions in real-time based on distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), distributed temperature sensing (DTS), and microseismic data, all provided by a small fiber- optic cable deployed in the well and monitored at surface via sophisticated interrogation equipment.\\n Historically, fiber-optic cables were deployed in a permanent configuration, strapped to the production casing, in a manner similar to a standard control line, and deployed with the casing prior to cementing. Permanent fiber has become simpler and cost effective over time and provides valuable near wellbore information - and there are continuous developments to keep reducing that cost and complexity. Some operator focus has been less on the monitoring of the completion efficiency metrics and more on understanding the cross well interference data provided from fiber. As a result, operators have looked to other, temporary-type deployment options for fiber.\\n Two typical temporary deployments are via coiled-tubing and an armored fiber-optic cable. For the first method, a fiber-optic cable is fed into a coiled-tubing reel and then deployed downhole to monitor the strain when the well is impacted or closely impacted by a hydraulic fracture from an adjacent well. An armored fiber-optic cable deployment is similar to electric wireline in that it is installed in the well during pump down or with a wireline tractor.\\n Both these options are viable and readily available; however, they include supplementary expenses in terms of equipment required to convey the fiber into the well. In addition, the surface footprint required during the conveyance and monitoring phases of the operation is substantial with crane(s), a coiled-tubing unit or wireline unit, and associated on-location equipment required during the job. Figure 1 depicts a wireline-conveyed fiber operation in conjunction with fracturing operations. Additional equipment in the form of a wireline truck and extra crane are highlighted in yellow. In contrast, a wellsite where disposable fiber is being deployed is shown in Figure 2. Once the fiber is landed, the pump units are removed and only a trailer and crew pickup remain on-site.\\n Figure 1 Typical fracturing operation, wireline-conveyed fiber\\n Figure 2 Typical offset well monitoring wellsite, disposable fiber\\n This paper will discuss a new, low-cost option now available to conduct cross well monitoring and microseismic evaluation of offset completions using a disposable optical fiber that requires minimal equipment to deploy into the wellbore, reduces surface impact during the operational phase, provides quality strain information with excellent quality microseismic data when compared to other fiber-optic deployment methods, and is able to be disposed of at the conclusion of the operation with no detriments or impediments to the completion of the well it has been deployed in. This fiber was successfully deployed for the first time in the Marcellus Shale for Chesapeake Energy with minimal operational disturbance and reduced costs when compared to similar technologies. It was demonstrated to provide valuable data for the purposes of understanding the impact of hydraulic fracturing on far-field communication and evaluating both the temporal fracture response and zonal impact caused by structural changes across the lateral.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Tue, February 01, 2022\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Tue, February 01, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/209148-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, February 01, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209148-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,利用光纤传感技术来评估完井效率、初级水泥环完整性和邻井干扰已经变得越来越普遍。此外,最近还引入了使用光纤电缆进行微地震监测,而不是传统的电缆传输检波器。多年来,开发了各种光纤部署方法,使作业者能够基于分布式声学传感(DAS)、分布式温度传感(DTS)和微地震数据,实时快速做出决策,所有这些数据都由部署在井中的小型光纤电缆提供,并通过复杂的探测设备在地面进行监测。过去,光纤电缆被固定在生产套管上,与标准控制线类似,并在固井前与套管一起下入。随着时间的推移,永久光纤变得更简单、更经济,并提供了有价值的近井信息,并且不断发展,以不断降低成本和复杂性。一些作业者很少关注完井效率指标的监测,而是更多地关注光纤提供的井间干扰数据。因此,运营商开始寻找其他临时性的光纤部署方案。两种典型的临时部署方式是通过连续油管和装甲光纤电缆。对于第一种方法,将光纤电缆送入连续油管卷盘,然后部署在井下,以监测井受到相邻井水力压裂冲击或紧密冲击时的应变。铠装光纤电缆的部署与电缆类似,它是在泵送或电缆牵引器的作用下安装在井中。这两种选择都是可行且容易获得的;然而,这些费用包括将纤维输送到井中所需设备的补充费用。此外,在作业的传输和监测阶段,需要使用起重机、连续油管设备或电缆设备以及作业期间所需的相关现场设备,从而占用大量地面空间。图1描述了电缆输送光纤作业与压裂作业的结合。以电缆卡车和额外起重机形式的额外设备以黄色突出显示。与此相反,部署一次性光纤的井场如图2所示。一旦光纤落地,泵装置就会被移除,只剩下一辆拖车和工作人员的皮卡。本文将讨论一种新的低成本方案,即使用一次性光纤对邻井完井进行井间监测和微地震评估,该方案所需的设备最少,可以部署到井筒中,减少作业阶段对地面的影响。与其他光纤部署方法相比,该方法提供了高质量的应变信息和高质量的微地震数据,并且能够在作业结束时进行处理,不会对所部署的井的完井造成损害或阻碍。与类似技术相比,该光纤首次成功应用于Chesapeake Energy公司的Marcellus页岩,操作干扰最小,降低了成本。该方法为了解水力压裂对远场通信的影响,以及评估横向结构变化造成的时间裂缝响应和层间影响提供了有价值的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Disposable Fiber Technology to Evaluate Far-Field Communication and Fracture Performance in the Marcellus Shale
The use of fiber-optic-sensing technology for the evaluation of completion efficiency, primary cement sheath integrity, and offset well interference has become more prevalent in recent years. In addition, the use of a fiber-optic cable for microseismic monitoring as opposed to traditional wireline-conveyed geophones was recently introduced. Various fiber deployment methods have been developed over the years to allow operators to make rapid decisions in real-time based on distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), distributed temperature sensing (DTS), and microseismic data, all provided by a small fiber- optic cable deployed in the well and monitored at surface via sophisticated interrogation equipment. Historically, fiber-optic cables were deployed in a permanent configuration, strapped to the production casing, in a manner similar to a standard control line, and deployed with the casing prior to cementing. Permanent fiber has become simpler and cost effective over time and provides valuable near wellbore information - and there are continuous developments to keep reducing that cost and complexity. Some operator focus has been less on the monitoring of the completion efficiency metrics and more on understanding the cross well interference data provided from fiber. As a result, operators have looked to other, temporary-type deployment options for fiber. Two typical temporary deployments are via coiled-tubing and an armored fiber-optic cable. For the first method, a fiber-optic cable is fed into a coiled-tubing reel and then deployed downhole to monitor the strain when the well is impacted or closely impacted by a hydraulic fracture from an adjacent well. An armored fiber-optic cable deployment is similar to electric wireline in that it is installed in the well during pump down or with a wireline tractor. Both these options are viable and readily available; however, they include supplementary expenses in terms of equipment required to convey the fiber into the well. In addition, the surface footprint required during the conveyance and monitoring phases of the operation is substantial with crane(s), a coiled-tubing unit or wireline unit, and associated on-location equipment required during the job. Figure 1 depicts a wireline-conveyed fiber operation in conjunction with fracturing operations. Additional equipment in the form of a wireline truck and extra crane are highlighted in yellow. In contrast, a wellsite where disposable fiber is being deployed is shown in Figure 2. Once the fiber is landed, the pump units are removed and only a trailer and crew pickup remain on-site. Figure 1 Typical fracturing operation, wireline-conveyed fiber Figure 2 Typical offset well monitoring wellsite, disposable fiber This paper will discuss a new, low-cost option now available to conduct cross well monitoring and microseismic evaluation of offset completions using a disposable optical fiber that requires minimal equipment to deploy into the wellbore, reduces surface impact during the operational phase, provides quality strain information with excellent quality microseismic data when compared to other fiber-optic deployment methods, and is able to be disposed of at the conclusion of the operation with no detriments or impediments to the completion of the well it has been deployed in. This fiber was successfully deployed for the first time in the Marcellus Shale for Chesapeake Energy with minimal operational disturbance and reduced costs when compared to similar technologies. It was demonstrated to provide valuable data for the purposes of understanding the impact of hydraulic fracturing on far-field communication and evaluating both the temporal fracture response and zonal impact caused by structural changes across the lateral.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信