无效与法律:医生在临终关怀中的知识、实践和态度

L. Willmott, B. White, Eliana Close, C. Gallois, M. Parker, N. Graves, S. Winch, L. Callaway, Nicole Shepherd
{"title":"无效与法律:医生在临终关怀中的知识、实践和态度","authors":"L. Willmott, B. White, Eliana Close, C. Gallois, M. Parker, N. Graves, S. Winch, L. Callaway, Nicole Shepherd","doi":"10.5204/QUTLR.V16I1.622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the potential harm to patients (and others) and the financial cost of providing futile treatment at the end of life, this practice occurs. This article reports on empirical research undertaken in Queensland that explores doctors’ perceptions about the law that governs futile treatment at the end of life, and the role it plays in medical practice. The findings reveal that doctors have poor knowledge of their legal obligations and powers when making decisions about withholding or withdrawing futile treatment at the end of life; their attitudes towards the law were largely negative; and the law affected their clinical practice and had or would cause them to provide futile treatment.","PeriodicalId":368986,"journal":{"name":"Queensland University of Technology (QUT) - Law & Justice Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Futility and the Law: Knowledge, Practice and Attitudes of Doctors in End of Life Care\",\"authors\":\"L. Willmott, B. White, Eliana Close, C. Gallois, M. Parker, N. Graves, S. Winch, L. Callaway, Nicole Shepherd\",\"doi\":\"10.5204/QUTLR.V16I1.622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the potential harm to patients (and others) and the financial cost of providing futile treatment at the end of life, this practice occurs. This article reports on empirical research undertaken in Queensland that explores doctors’ perceptions about the law that governs futile treatment at the end of life, and the role it plays in medical practice. The findings reveal that doctors have poor knowledge of their legal obligations and powers when making decisions about withholding or withdrawing futile treatment at the end of life; their attitudes towards the law were largely negative; and the law affected their clinical practice and had or would cause them to provide futile treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Queensland University of Technology (QUT) - Law & Justice Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Queensland University of Technology (QUT) - Law & Justice Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5204/QUTLR.V16I1.622\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Queensland University of Technology (QUT) - Law & Justice Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5204/QUTLR.V16I1.622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

尽管对病人(和其他人)有潜在的危害,并且在生命结束时提供无效治疗的经济成本很高,但这种做法仍在发生。本文报告了在昆士兰州进行的实证研究,探讨了医生对生命结束时无效治疗的法律的看法,以及它在医疗实践中所起的作用。研究结果表明,医生在决定是否在生命的最后阶段停止或撤销无效治疗时,对自己的法律义务和权力知之甚少;他们对法律的态度基本上是消极的;法律影响了他们的临床实践,已经或将导致他们提供无效的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Futility and the Law: Knowledge, Practice and Attitudes of Doctors in End of Life Care
Despite the potential harm to patients (and others) and the financial cost of providing futile treatment at the end of life, this practice occurs. This article reports on empirical research undertaken in Queensland that explores doctors’ perceptions about the law that governs futile treatment at the end of life, and the role it plays in medical practice. The findings reveal that doctors have poor knowledge of their legal obligations and powers when making decisions about withholding or withdrawing futile treatment at the end of life; their attitudes towards the law were largely negative; and the law affected their clinical practice and had or would cause them to provide futile treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信