医疗器械软件CE符合性与合格评定

Tuomas Granlund, T. Mikkonen, Vlad Stirbu
{"title":"医疗器械软件CE符合性与合格评定","authors":"Tuomas Granlund, T. Mikkonen, Vlad Stirbu","doi":"10.1109/ICSA-C50368.2020.00040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manufacturing of medical devices is strictly controlled by authorities, and manufacturers must conform to the regulatory requirements of the region in which a medical device is being marketed for use. In general, these requirements make no difference between the physical device, embedded software running inside a physical device. or software that constitutes the device in itself. As a result, standalone software with intended medical use is considered to be a medical device. Consequently, its development must meet the same requirements as the physical medical device manufacturing. This practice creates a unique challenge for organizations developing medical software. In this paper, we pinpoint a number of regulatory requirement mismatches between physical medical devices and standalone medical device software. The view is based on experiences from industry, from the development of all-software medical devices as well as from defining the manufacturing process so that it meets the regulatory requirements.","PeriodicalId":202587,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Medical Device Software CE Compliance and Conformity Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Tuomas Granlund, T. Mikkonen, Vlad Stirbu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSA-C50368.2020.00040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Manufacturing of medical devices is strictly controlled by authorities, and manufacturers must conform to the regulatory requirements of the region in which a medical device is being marketed for use. In general, these requirements make no difference between the physical device, embedded software running inside a physical device. or software that constitutes the device in itself. As a result, standalone software with intended medical use is considered to be a medical device. Consequently, its development must meet the same requirements as the physical medical device manufacturing. This practice creates a unique challenge for organizations developing medical software. In this paper, we pinpoint a number of regulatory requirement mismatches between physical medical devices and standalone medical device software. The view is based on experiences from industry, from the development of all-software medical devices as well as from defining the manufacturing process so that it meets the regulatory requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C50368.2020.00040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C50368.2020.00040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

医疗器械的生产受到主管部门的严格控制,制造商必须符合医疗器械销售使用地区的监管要求。一般来说,这些要求在物理设备、运行在物理设备内部的嵌入式软件之间没有区别。或者是构成设备本身的软件。因此,具有预期医疗用途的独立软件被认为是医疗设备。因此,它的发展必须满足与物理医疗器械制造相同的要求。这种做法给开发医疗软件的组织带来了独特的挑战。在本文中,我们指出了物理医疗设备和独立医疗设备软件之间的一些监管要求不匹配。该观点基于行业经验、全软件医疗设备的开发以及定义制造过程以满足监管要求的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Medical Device Software CE Compliance and Conformity Assessment
Manufacturing of medical devices is strictly controlled by authorities, and manufacturers must conform to the regulatory requirements of the region in which a medical device is being marketed for use. In general, these requirements make no difference between the physical device, embedded software running inside a physical device. or software that constitutes the device in itself. As a result, standalone software with intended medical use is considered to be a medical device. Consequently, its development must meet the same requirements as the physical medical device manufacturing. This practice creates a unique challenge for organizations developing medical software. In this paper, we pinpoint a number of regulatory requirement mismatches between physical medical devices and standalone medical device software. The view is based on experiences from industry, from the development of all-software medical devices as well as from defining the manufacturing process so that it meets the regulatory requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信