基于Penman-Monteith理论和土壤水分估算的南部大平原区域蒸散量

S. Liang, Chen Zhongxin, Jiang Zhiwei
{"title":"基于Penman-Monteith理论和土壤水分估算的南部大平原区域蒸散量","authors":"S. Liang, Chen Zhongxin, Jiang Zhiwei","doi":"10.1109/AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS.2014.6910680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Penman-Monteith (PM) theory is a classic method to calculate evapotranspiration (ET) of land surfaces. However, soil resistance, related to soil moisture, is always difficult to determine over a large region. In this study, we developed an ET estimation algorithm by incorporating a soil moisture index (SMI) derived from the improved surface temperature-vegetation cover feature space, denoted as the PM-SMI algorithm. The PM-SMI algorithm was compared with the triangle algorithm and another Penman-Monteith based algorithm (PM-Yuan) that calculated soil evaporation using relative humidity. The three ET algorithms are compared and validated by Bowen Ratio measurements at 12 sites in the Southern Great Plain (SGP) that were mainly covered by grassland and cropland with low vegetation cover. The results showed that the PM-SMI algorithm performs the best among the three ET algorithms both on the instantaneous scale with R2 of 0.86, RMSE of 53.67 W/m2, bias of 6.83 W/m2 and the daily scale with R2 of 0.87, RMSE of 39.07 W/m2, and bias of -4.04 W/m2. PM-Yuan algorithm significantly underestimates ET resulting from soil evaporation and compared to triangle ET algorithm, PM-SMI is more reliable for estimation of ET over regional scale.","PeriodicalId":161866,"journal":{"name":"2014 The Third International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics","volume":"60 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of regional evapotranspiration over the Southern Great Plains based on Penman-Monteith theory and the soil moisture estimates\",\"authors\":\"S. Liang, Chen Zhongxin, Jiang Zhiwei\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS.2014.6910680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Penman-Monteith (PM) theory is a classic method to calculate evapotranspiration (ET) of land surfaces. However, soil resistance, related to soil moisture, is always difficult to determine over a large region. In this study, we developed an ET estimation algorithm by incorporating a soil moisture index (SMI) derived from the improved surface temperature-vegetation cover feature space, denoted as the PM-SMI algorithm. The PM-SMI algorithm was compared with the triangle algorithm and another Penman-Monteith based algorithm (PM-Yuan) that calculated soil evaporation using relative humidity. The three ET algorithms are compared and validated by Bowen Ratio measurements at 12 sites in the Southern Great Plain (SGP) that were mainly covered by grassland and cropland with low vegetation cover. The results showed that the PM-SMI algorithm performs the best among the three ET algorithms both on the instantaneous scale with R2 of 0.86, RMSE of 53.67 W/m2, bias of 6.83 W/m2 and the daily scale with R2 of 0.87, RMSE of 39.07 W/m2, and bias of -4.04 W/m2. PM-Yuan algorithm significantly underestimates ET resulting from soil evaporation and compared to triangle ET algorithm, PM-SMI is more reliable for estimation of ET over regional scale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 The Third International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics\",\"volume\":\"60 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 The Third International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS.2014.6910680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 The Third International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS.2014.6910680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Penman-Monteith (PM)理论是计算地表蒸散发的经典方法。然而,与土壤湿度有关的土壤阻力在大范围内总是难以确定。在本研究中,我们开发了一种基于改进的地表温度-植被覆盖特征空间的土壤湿度指数(SMI)的ET估计算法,称为PM-SMI算法。将PM-SMI算法与三角算法和基于Penman-Monteith的基于相对湿度计算土壤蒸发的PM-Yuan算法进行了比较。通过在南方大平原12个以草地和低植被覆盖农田为主的测点的Bowen Ratio测量,对3种ET算法进行了比较和验证。结果表明,PM-SMI算法在瞬时尺度上表现最好,R2为0.86,RMSE为53.67 W/m2,偏差为6.83 W/m2;在日尺度上表现最好,R2为0.87,RMSE为39.07 W/m2,偏差为-4.04 W/m2。PM-Yuan算法显著低估了土壤蒸发产生的蒸散发,与三角蒸散发算法相比,PM-SMI算法在区域尺度上的蒸散发估算更为可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of regional evapotranspiration over the Southern Great Plains based on Penman-Monteith theory and the soil moisture estimates
Penman-Monteith (PM) theory is a classic method to calculate evapotranspiration (ET) of land surfaces. However, soil resistance, related to soil moisture, is always difficult to determine over a large region. In this study, we developed an ET estimation algorithm by incorporating a soil moisture index (SMI) derived from the improved surface temperature-vegetation cover feature space, denoted as the PM-SMI algorithm. The PM-SMI algorithm was compared with the triangle algorithm and another Penman-Monteith based algorithm (PM-Yuan) that calculated soil evaporation using relative humidity. The three ET algorithms are compared and validated by Bowen Ratio measurements at 12 sites in the Southern Great Plain (SGP) that were mainly covered by grassland and cropland with low vegetation cover. The results showed that the PM-SMI algorithm performs the best among the three ET algorithms both on the instantaneous scale with R2 of 0.86, RMSE of 53.67 W/m2, bias of 6.83 W/m2 and the daily scale with R2 of 0.87, RMSE of 39.07 W/m2, and bias of -4.04 W/m2. PM-Yuan algorithm significantly underestimates ET resulting from soil evaporation and compared to triangle ET algorithm, PM-SMI is more reliable for estimation of ET over regional scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信