管理新联邦制的专家系统

W. Foskett
{"title":"管理新联邦制的专家系统","authors":"W. Foskett","doi":"10.1109/MESPP.1990.122683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Change in the locus of operating knowledge that accompanies 'New Federalism' policies implies different design and knowledge-engineering approaches for expert system applications. An expert systems strategy to implement a New Federalism approach in a Congressionally-mandated regulatory program is discussed. Tactical needs created by competition with conventional knowledge-delivery mechanisms are analyzed. Three knowledge-engineering tactics especially suitable for developing expert systems in this application environment are described.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":232478,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings [1990] IEEE Conference on Managing Expert System Programs and Projects","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing expert systems for New Federalism\",\"authors\":\"W. Foskett\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MESPP.1990.122683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Change in the locus of operating knowledge that accompanies 'New Federalism' policies implies different design and knowledge-engineering approaches for expert system applications. An expert systems strategy to implement a New Federalism approach in a Congressionally-mandated regulatory program is discussed. Tactical needs created by competition with conventional knowledge-delivery mechanisms are analyzed. Three knowledge-engineering tactics especially suitable for developing expert systems in this application environment are described.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":232478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings [1990] IEEE Conference on Managing Expert System Programs and Projects\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings [1990] IEEE Conference on Managing Expert System Programs and Projects\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MESPP.1990.122683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings [1990] IEEE Conference on Managing Expert System Programs and Projects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MESPP.1990.122683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伴随着“新联邦制”政策的操作知识轨迹的变化意味着专家系统应用的不同设计和知识工程方法。讨论了在国会授权的监管计划中实施新联邦制方法的专家系统策略。分析了与传统知识传递机制竞争所产生的战术需求。介绍了三种特别适合在这种应用环境下开发专家系统的知识工程策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Managing expert systems for New Federalism
Change in the locus of operating knowledge that accompanies 'New Federalism' policies implies different design and knowledge-engineering approaches for expert system applications. An expert systems strategy to implement a New Federalism approach in a Congressionally-mandated regulatory program is discussed. Tactical needs created by competition with conventional knowledge-delivery mechanisms are analyzed. Three knowledge-engineering tactics especially suitable for developing expert systems in this application environment are described.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信