评论家:用于搜索和检查系统更改的交互式代码审查工具

Tianyi Zhang, Myoungkyu Song, Miryung Kim
{"title":"评论家:用于搜索和检查系统更改的交互式代码审查工具","authors":"Tianyi Zhang, Myoungkyu Song, Miryung Kim","doi":"10.1145/2635868.2661675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During peer code reviews, developers often examine program differences. When using existing program differencing tools, it is difficult for developers to inspect systematic changes—similar, related changes that are scattered across multiple files. Developers cannot easily answer questions such as \"what other code locations changed similar to this change?\" and \"are there any other locations that are similar to this code but are not updated?\" In this paper, we demonstrate Critics, an Eclipse plug-in that assists developers in inspecting systematic changes. It (1) allows developers to customize a context-aware change template, (2) searches for systematic changes using the template, and (3) detects missing or inconsistent edits. Developers can interactively refine the customized change template to see corresponding search results. Critics has potential to improve developer productivity in inspecting large, scattered edits during code reviews. The tool's demonstration video is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2D7t_Z5rhk","PeriodicalId":250543,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering","volume":"469 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critics: an interactive code review tool for searching and inspecting systematic changes\",\"authors\":\"Tianyi Zhang, Myoungkyu Song, Miryung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2635868.2661675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During peer code reviews, developers often examine program differences. When using existing program differencing tools, it is difficult for developers to inspect systematic changes—similar, related changes that are scattered across multiple files. Developers cannot easily answer questions such as \\\"what other code locations changed similar to this change?\\\" and \\\"are there any other locations that are similar to this code but are not updated?\\\" In this paper, we demonstrate Critics, an Eclipse plug-in that assists developers in inspecting systematic changes. It (1) allows developers to customize a context-aware change template, (2) searches for systematic changes using the template, and (3) detects missing or inconsistent edits. Developers can interactively refine the customized change template to see corresponding search results. Critics has potential to improve developer productivity in inspecting large, scattered edits during code reviews. The tool's demonstration video is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2D7t_Z5rhk\",\"PeriodicalId\":250543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"469 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2635868.2661675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2635868.2661675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在同级代码审查期间,开发人员经常检查程序差异。当使用现有的程序差异工具时,开发人员很难检查系统更改—分散在多个文件中的类似的、相关的更改。开发人员不能轻易地回答诸如“还有哪些代码位置发生了类似的变化?”和“是否有其他位置与此代码类似,但没有更新?”在本文中,我们将演示一个Eclipse插件,它可以帮助开发人员检查系统更改。它(1)允许开发人员定制上下文感知的更改模板,(2)使用模板搜索系统更改,以及(3)检测缺失或不一致的编辑。开发人员可以交互地细化定制的更改模板,以查看相应的搜索结果。在代码审查期间,评论家有可能通过检查大型的、分散的编辑来提高开发人员的工作效率。该工具的演示视频可在https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2D7t_Z5rhk上获得
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critics: an interactive code review tool for searching and inspecting systematic changes
During peer code reviews, developers often examine program differences. When using existing program differencing tools, it is difficult for developers to inspect systematic changes—similar, related changes that are scattered across multiple files. Developers cannot easily answer questions such as "what other code locations changed similar to this change?" and "are there any other locations that are similar to this code but are not updated?" In this paper, we demonstrate Critics, an Eclipse plug-in that assists developers in inspecting systematic changes. It (1) allows developers to customize a context-aware change template, (2) searches for systematic changes using the template, and (3) detects missing or inconsistent edits. Developers can interactively refine the customized change template to see corresponding search results. Critics has potential to improve developer productivity in inspecting large, scattered edits during code reviews. The tool's demonstration video is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2D7t_Z5rhk
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信