Elizabeth Walton, Baptiste Caramiaux, S. Alaoui, Frédéric Bevilacqua, W. Mackay
{"title":"协调基于运动的设计的技术驱动和体验方法:协调基于运动的设计的技术和体验方法","authors":"Elizabeth Walton, Baptiste Caramiaux, S. Alaoui, Frédéric Bevilacqua, W. Mackay","doi":"10.1145/3450522.3451334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human movement is rich and complex and has been studied from two seemingly opposing design approaches: technology-driven design which seeks to continuously improve movement and gesture creation and recognition for both the user and the system; and experiential design which explores nuances of aesthetic human movement, cultivates body awareness, and develops methods for movement in embodied design. We compare and contrast these approaches with respect to their intended users and contexts, focus of the movement, and respective stages of the technology design process. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities for future research that takes both perspectives into account.","PeriodicalId":330419,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconciling Technology-Driven and Experiential Approaches for Movement-Based Design: Réconcilier les approches technologiques et expérientielles pour le design basé sur le mouvement\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Walton, Baptiste Caramiaux, S. Alaoui, Frédéric Bevilacqua, W. Mackay\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3450522.3451334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human movement is rich and complex and has been studied from two seemingly opposing design approaches: technology-driven design which seeks to continuously improve movement and gesture creation and recognition for both the user and the system; and experiential design which explores nuances of aesthetic human movement, cultivates body awareness, and develops methods for movement in embodied design. We compare and contrast these approaches with respect to their intended users and contexts, focus of the movement, and respective stages of the technology design process. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities for future research that takes both perspectives into account.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3450522.3451334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3450522.3451334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reconciling Technology-Driven and Experiential Approaches for Movement-Based Design: Réconcilier les approches technologiques et expérientielles pour le design basé sur le mouvement
Human movement is rich and complex and has been studied from two seemingly opposing design approaches: technology-driven design which seeks to continuously improve movement and gesture creation and recognition for both the user and the system; and experiential design which explores nuances of aesthetic human movement, cultivates body awareness, and develops methods for movement in embodied design. We compare and contrast these approaches with respect to their intended users and contexts, focus of the movement, and respective stages of the technology design process. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities for future research that takes both perspectives into account.