{"title":"未经同意计算的比较伦理","authors":"Meg Leta Jones","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS.2018.8638277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consent is central to information policy around the world, and the basis for much of privacy and data protection law. This paper argues that consent to compute is a distinct notion and an important aspect of European-style data protection regimes and has not had the same treatment in the U.S., resulting in a great deal of tension between the regions. Moral grounds on which the U.S. and Europe disagree include the nature of the act of computing in relation to individuals and the moral background on which the transaction sits","PeriodicalId":122477,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Ethics of Computing Without Consent\",\"authors\":\"Meg Leta Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISTAS.2018.8638277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consent is central to information policy around the world, and the basis for much of privacy and data protection law. This paper argues that consent to compute is a distinct notion and an important aspect of European-style data protection regimes and has not had the same treatment in the U.S., resulting in a great deal of tension between the regions. Moral grounds on which the U.S. and Europe disagree include the nature of the act of computing in relation to individuals and the moral background on which the transaction sits\",\"PeriodicalId\":122477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2018.8638277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2018.8638277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Consent is central to information policy around the world, and the basis for much of privacy and data protection law. This paper argues that consent to compute is a distinct notion and an important aspect of European-style data protection regimes and has not had the same treatment in the U.S., resulting in a great deal of tension between the regions. Moral grounds on which the U.S. and Europe disagree include the nature of the act of computing in relation to individuals and the moral background on which the transaction sits