未经同意计算的比较伦理

Meg Leta Jones
{"title":"未经同意计算的比较伦理","authors":"Meg Leta Jones","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS.2018.8638277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consent is central to information policy around the world, and the basis for much of privacy and data protection law. This paper argues that consent to compute is a distinct notion and an important aspect of European-style data protection regimes and has not had the same treatment in the U.S., resulting in a great deal of tension between the regions. Moral grounds on which the U.S. and Europe disagree include the nature of the act of computing in relation to individuals and the moral background on which the transaction sits","PeriodicalId":122477,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Ethics of Computing Without Consent\",\"authors\":\"Meg Leta Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISTAS.2018.8638277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consent is central to information policy around the world, and the basis for much of privacy and data protection law. This paper argues that consent to compute is a distinct notion and an important aspect of European-style data protection regimes and has not had the same treatment in the U.S., resulting in a great deal of tension between the regions. Moral grounds on which the U.S. and Europe disagree include the nature of the act of computing in relation to individuals and the moral background on which the transaction sits\",\"PeriodicalId\":122477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2018.8638277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2018.8638277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

同意是世界各地信息政策的核心,也是许多隐私和数据保护法的基础。本文认为,同意计算是一个独特的概念,是欧洲式数据保护制度的一个重要方面,在美国没有得到同样的待遇,导致地区之间的紧张关系很大。美国和欧洲存在分歧的道德基础包括与个人相关的计算行为的性质以及交易所处的道德背景
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Ethics of Computing Without Consent
Consent is central to information policy around the world, and the basis for much of privacy and data protection law. This paper argues that consent to compute is a distinct notion and an important aspect of European-style data protection regimes and has not had the same treatment in the U.S., resulting in a great deal of tension between the regions. Moral grounds on which the U.S. and Europe disagree include the nature of the act of computing in relation to individuals and the moral background on which the transaction sits
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信