投资条约仲裁是“审查”吗?《投资者与国家仲裁中的比例性与顺从:平衡投资保护与监管自治》(剑桥大学出版社,2015)

C. Foster
{"title":"投资条约仲裁是“审查”吗?《投资者与国家仲裁中的比例性与顺从:平衡投资保护与监管自治》(剑桥大学出版社,2015)","authors":"C. Foster","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2814893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This brief review devotes attention to the important contemporary question underlying Dr. Henckels' book of whether investment treaty arbitration ought to be characterised as review.","PeriodicalId":130703,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Public International Law: Courts & Adjudication (Topic)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Investment Treaty Arbitration 'Review'? Reviewing Caroline Henckels’ Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge University Press, 2015)\",\"authors\":\"C. Foster\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2814893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This brief review devotes attention to the important contemporary question underlying Dr. Henckels' book of whether investment treaty arbitration ought to be characterised as review.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Other Public International Law: Courts & Adjudication (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Other Public International Law: Courts & Adjudication (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2814893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Public International Law: Courts & Adjudication (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2814893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇简短的评论关注了汉克尔斯博士的书中关于投资条约仲裁是否应该被定性为审查的重要当代问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Investment Treaty Arbitration 'Review'? Reviewing Caroline Henckels’ Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge University Press, 2015)
This brief review devotes attention to the important contemporary question underlying Dr. Henckels' book of whether investment treaty arbitration ought to be characterised as review.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信