发展的选择:中国和拉丁美洲的旧挑战和新杂交

Paul Bowles, Henry Veltmeyer
{"title":"发展的选择:中国和拉丁美洲的旧挑战和新杂交","authors":"Paul Bowles, Henry Veltmeyer","doi":"10.35533/ecd.0917.pb.hv","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current, dominant conceptualisation of International Development Studies, «development» is based on the emancipation from poverty for the more than one-billion people who are unable to satisfy their basic human needs, in a world that has never been richer in material terms. Critical development studies attempts to understand why the many projects of development that have been implemented have not led to the stated emancipatory goal after five decades of multiple initiatives and resources, and propose alternatives to the conventional model. To that end, this article examines and theorizes the dynamic of capitalist system's development project; offers tools for the analysis of States, societies and communities which have attempted to create better living conditions and defy orthodox models; outline the resistance to capitalism and the search for alternatives in the peripheries; conceptualize peripheral capitalist subdevelopment or development and post-capitalism or post-development from a perspective of unequal development; reveal the failure of dominant economic development theory and policy that is unable to understand or ignores the underlying dynamic of capitalist development. Consequently, the article proposes going beyond capitalism with the forces of progressive change, oriented toward an alternative development. It analyzes case studies in China and Latin America, where a series of hybridizations are identified that could offer lessons for how to create alternatives to capitalism.","PeriodicalId":431645,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Críticos del Desarrollo","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternativas de desarrollo: viejos desafíos y nuevas hibridaciones en China y América Latina\",\"authors\":\"Paul Bowles, Henry Veltmeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.35533/ecd.0917.pb.hv\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the current, dominant conceptualisation of International Development Studies, «development» is based on the emancipation from poverty for the more than one-billion people who are unable to satisfy their basic human needs, in a world that has never been richer in material terms. Critical development studies attempts to understand why the many projects of development that have been implemented have not led to the stated emancipatory goal after five decades of multiple initiatives and resources, and propose alternatives to the conventional model. To that end, this article examines and theorizes the dynamic of capitalist system's development project; offers tools for the analysis of States, societies and communities which have attempted to create better living conditions and defy orthodox models; outline the resistance to capitalism and the search for alternatives in the peripheries; conceptualize peripheral capitalist subdevelopment or development and post-capitalism or post-development from a perspective of unequal development; reveal the failure of dominant economic development theory and policy that is unable to understand or ignores the underlying dynamic of capitalist development. Consequently, the article proposes going beyond capitalism with the forces of progressive change, oriented toward an alternative development. It analyzes case studies in China and Latin America, where a series of hybridizations are identified that could offer lessons for how to create alternatives to capitalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios Críticos del Desarrollo\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios Críticos del Desarrollo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35533/ecd.0917.pb.hv\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Críticos del Desarrollo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35533/ecd.0917.pb.hv","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在目前占主导地位的国际发展研究概念中,“发展”的基础是在一个物质条件从未如此丰富的世界中,使无法满足其基本人类需求的10多亿人摆脱贫困。批判性发展研究试图理解为什么经过五十年的多种倡议和资源,已经实施的许多发展项目并没有导致既定的解放目标,并提出传统模式的替代方案。为此,本文考察并理论化了资本主义制度发展工程的动态性;为分析那些试图创造更好的生活条件并蔑视正统模式的国家、社会和社区提供工具;概述对资本主义的抵抗和在边缘地区寻找替代方案;从不平等发展的角度对外围资本主义次发展或发展和后资本主义或后发展进行概念化;揭示主导经济发展理论和政策的失败,这些理论和政策无法理解或忽视资本主义发展的潜在动力。因此,本文建议以进步变革的力量超越资本主义,走向另一种发展。它分析了中国和拉丁美洲的案例研究,在那里发现了一系列杂交,可以为如何创造资本主义的替代品提供经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternativas de desarrollo: viejos desafíos y nuevas hibridaciones en China y América Latina
In the current, dominant conceptualisation of International Development Studies, «development» is based on the emancipation from poverty for the more than one-billion people who are unable to satisfy their basic human needs, in a world that has never been richer in material terms. Critical development studies attempts to understand why the many projects of development that have been implemented have not led to the stated emancipatory goal after five decades of multiple initiatives and resources, and propose alternatives to the conventional model. To that end, this article examines and theorizes the dynamic of capitalist system's development project; offers tools for the analysis of States, societies and communities which have attempted to create better living conditions and defy orthodox models; outline the resistance to capitalism and the search for alternatives in the peripheries; conceptualize peripheral capitalist subdevelopment or development and post-capitalism or post-development from a perspective of unequal development; reveal the failure of dominant economic development theory and policy that is unable to understand or ignores the underlying dynamic of capitalist development. Consequently, the article proposes going beyond capitalism with the forces of progressive change, oriented toward an alternative development. It analyzes case studies in China and Latin America, where a series of hybridizations are identified that could offer lessons for how to create alternatives to capitalism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信