{"title":"在激进正统和转向经验主义之间:对斯泰西的回答","authors":"Anna Rowlands","doi":"10.1080/23269995.2018.1531489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This response to Tim Stacey’s paper agrees with Stacey’s assertion of the importance of narrative and myth to political culture but aims to challenge the notion that we need turn solely to the empirical and ethnographic to find resources outside of the Radically Orthodox in order to ground such an appeal. This is a reply to: Stacey, T. (2018) ‘Beyond populist politics: why conventional politics needs to conjure myths of its own and why it struggles to do so’. Global Discourse. doi:10.1080/23269995.2018.1524208","PeriodicalId":213164,"journal":{"name":"Cultivating New Post-secular Political Space","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between radical orthodoxy and the turn to the empirical: a reply to Stacey\",\"authors\":\"Anna Rowlands\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23269995.2018.1531489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This response to Tim Stacey’s paper agrees with Stacey’s assertion of the importance of narrative and myth to political culture but aims to challenge the notion that we need turn solely to the empirical and ethnographic to find resources outside of the Radically Orthodox in order to ground such an appeal. This is a reply to: Stacey, T. (2018) ‘Beyond populist politics: why conventional politics needs to conjure myths of its own and why it struggles to do so’. Global Discourse. doi:10.1080/23269995.2018.1524208\",\"PeriodicalId\":213164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultivating New Post-secular Political Space\",\"volume\":\"2013 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultivating New Post-secular Political Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2018.1531489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultivating New Post-secular Political Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2018.1531489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Between radical orthodoxy and the turn to the empirical: a reply to Stacey
This response to Tim Stacey’s paper agrees with Stacey’s assertion of the importance of narrative and myth to political culture but aims to challenge the notion that we need turn solely to the empirical and ethnographic to find resources outside of the Radically Orthodox in order to ground such an appeal. This is a reply to: Stacey, T. (2018) ‘Beyond populist politics: why conventional politics needs to conjure myths of its own and why it struggles to do so’. Global Discourse. doi:10.1080/23269995.2018.1524208
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
