{"title":"藻酸盐印模材料与含漱液混合流动性能的评价","authors":"S. Sastrodihardjo, K. Harahap","doi":"10.32793/jmkg.v7i2.371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of antiseptic and gargle solutions mixed with the irreversible hydrocolloid alginate impression material to anti-bacterial activity and several properties had been elucidated. The flow property of the such impression has been not elucidated yet. The aim of the study was to evaluate the flow property of alginate impression mixed with gargle solution. Aroma Fine Plus alginate impression material was used and mixed with aquadest as control and Minosep, Betadine and Total Care gargle solutions. Ratio between alginate and each solutions were performed by following the producer’s guidance as 8.4gr alginate and 20ml solution. The every alginate mixtures were made in triplicate (n=3). Measurement of flow capability was performed by using 0.5ml of alginate mix laid on glass plate covered with cellophane strip and loaded with 1kg metal for 1 minute. The major and minor diameters were measured by using digital caliper. Data were analyzed by using one way ANOVA (α= 0.05). Aroma Fine mixed with aquadest showed the flow capability was about 26.18mm. Mixed with Minosep showed about 27.85mm, with Betadine 29.19mm and Total Care 27.11mm respectively. Statistically show a significant different flow capability between aquadest and Betadine mixed impression (p=0.01). Minosep and Total Care gargle solutions showed insignificant different with aquadest mixed impression (p>0.05). It can be concluded that the utilizing of Minosep and Total care gargle solution as solutions mixed with alginate impression material have no effect to flow property of the impression, except by using Betadine gargle solution.","PeriodicalId":228221,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Material Kedokteran Gigi","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evaluation of Flow Property of Alginate Impression Material Mixed with Gargle Solutions\",\"authors\":\"S. Sastrodihardjo, K. Harahap\",\"doi\":\"10.32793/jmkg.v7i2.371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The effects of antiseptic and gargle solutions mixed with the irreversible hydrocolloid alginate impression material to anti-bacterial activity and several properties had been elucidated. The flow property of the such impression has been not elucidated yet. The aim of the study was to evaluate the flow property of alginate impression mixed with gargle solution. Aroma Fine Plus alginate impression material was used and mixed with aquadest as control and Minosep, Betadine and Total Care gargle solutions. Ratio between alginate and each solutions were performed by following the producer’s guidance as 8.4gr alginate and 20ml solution. The every alginate mixtures were made in triplicate (n=3). Measurement of flow capability was performed by using 0.5ml of alginate mix laid on glass plate covered with cellophane strip and loaded with 1kg metal for 1 minute. The major and minor diameters were measured by using digital caliper. Data were analyzed by using one way ANOVA (α= 0.05). Aroma Fine mixed with aquadest showed the flow capability was about 26.18mm. Mixed with Minosep showed about 27.85mm, with Betadine 29.19mm and Total Care 27.11mm respectively. Statistically show a significant different flow capability between aquadest and Betadine mixed impression (p=0.01). Minosep and Total Care gargle solutions showed insignificant different with aquadest mixed impression (p>0.05). It can be concluded that the utilizing of Minosep and Total care gargle solution as solutions mixed with alginate impression material have no effect to flow property of the impression, except by using Betadine gargle solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Material Kedokteran Gigi\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Material Kedokteran Gigi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32793/jmkg.v7i2.371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Material Kedokteran Gigi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32793/jmkg.v7i2.371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
研究了不可逆水胶体海藻酸盐印模材料与含漱液混合后对抗菌活性和若干性能的影响。这种压痕的流动特性尚未得到阐明。本研究的目的是评价海藻酸盐印模与含漱液混合后的流动性能。使用Aroma Fine Plus海藻酸盐压印材料,并与aquadest作为对照和Minosep, Betadine和Total Care含漱液混合。海藻酸盐和每种溶液的比例按照生产商的指导为8.4gr海藻酸盐和20ml溶液。每种海藻酸盐混合物一式三份(n=3)。将0.5ml海藻酸盐混合物放置在玻璃板上,玻璃板上覆盖玻璃纸条,并装载1kg金属,放置1分钟,测量流动能力。采用数字卡尺测量了大径和小径。数据采用单因素方差分析(α= 0.05)。芳香精与aquadest混合后的流动能力约为26.18mm。与米诺赛普配伍约27.85mm,与倍他定配伍29.19mm,与Total Care配伍27.11mm。两组间流动能力差异有统计学意义(p=0.01)。Minosep和Total Care含漱液与aquadest混合印象液差异不显著(p>0.05)。由此可见,除使用倍他定含漱液外,Minosep和Total care含漱液与海藻酸盐印模材料混合使用对印模的流动性能没有影响。
The Evaluation of Flow Property of Alginate Impression Material Mixed with Gargle Solutions
The effects of antiseptic and gargle solutions mixed with the irreversible hydrocolloid alginate impression material to anti-bacterial activity and several properties had been elucidated. The flow property of the such impression has been not elucidated yet. The aim of the study was to evaluate the flow property of alginate impression mixed with gargle solution. Aroma Fine Plus alginate impression material was used and mixed with aquadest as control and Minosep, Betadine and Total Care gargle solutions. Ratio between alginate and each solutions were performed by following the producer’s guidance as 8.4gr alginate and 20ml solution. The every alginate mixtures were made in triplicate (n=3). Measurement of flow capability was performed by using 0.5ml of alginate mix laid on glass plate covered with cellophane strip and loaded with 1kg metal for 1 minute. The major and minor diameters were measured by using digital caliper. Data were analyzed by using one way ANOVA (α= 0.05). Aroma Fine mixed with aquadest showed the flow capability was about 26.18mm. Mixed with Minosep showed about 27.85mm, with Betadine 29.19mm and Total Care 27.11mm respectively. Statistically show a significant different flow capability between aquadest and Betadine mixed impression (p=0.01). Minosep and Total Care gargle solutions showed insignificant different with aquadest mixed impression (p>0.05). It can be concluded that the utilizing of Minosep and Total care gargle solution as solutions mixed with alginate impression material have no effect to flow property of the impression, except by using Betadine gargle solution.