科特迪瓦拉姆托三种昆虫收集方法的效率

Dohouonan Diabat e, Y. Tano
{"title":"科特迪瓦拉姆托三种昆虫收集方法的效率","authors":"Dohouonan Diabat e, Y. Tano","doi":"10.5897/ijbc2020.1415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Insects are of ecological and economic importance. This study was carried out to compare the efficiency of the three main insect sampling methods namely, sweep net, hand sampling and the light trap and also to show the biodiversity distribution from Lamto habitats for good biological conservation. A total of 379 individuals belonging to 9 orders were collected. Significantly, more individuals were collected by sweeping net compared to hand sampling and light trap. From the capture rate, highest rate was recorded for sweeping net (0.720) followed by hand (0.232) and light trap (0.047). The lowest value of Shannon’s index was 0.672 with the light trap followed by hand (1.375) and the highest was 1.940 with sweeping net in Lamto’s habitats. The insect orders recorded with the hand were Heteroptera, Coleoptera, Homoptera, Hymenoptera, Orthoptera, Diptera and Isoptera (F = 11.340, P value = 0.006). Light trap was more suitable to capture Lepidoptera (3.250%), Coleoptera (0.750%) and Homoptera (0.500%) (F= 6.659, P value= 0.0001). The abundance index recorded with the sweeping net commonly varied between 0.0 and 18.250%. Both sweeping net and hand insect sampling techniques were the most efficient and showed the highest insect orders complementarity. However, the use of sweep net, hand sampling and light trap were recommended to have good collection of insects. \n \n   \n \n Key words: Sweep net, light trap, hand sampling, insects’ conservation, capture effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":143839,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiencies of three insect collection methods in Lamto, Cte dIvoire\",\"authors\":\"Dohouonan Diabat e, Y. Tano\",\"doi\":\"10.5897/ijbc2020.1415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Insects are of ecological and economic importance. This study was carried out to compare the efficiency of the three main insect sampling methods namely, sweep net, hand sampling and the light trap and also to show the biodiversity distribution from Lamto habitats for good biological conservation. A total of 379 individuals belonging to 9 orders were collected. Significantly, more individuals were collected by sweeping net compared to hand sampling and light trap. From the capture rate, highest rate was recorded for sweeping net (0.720) followed by hand (0.232) and light trap (0.047). The lowest value of Shannon’s index was 0.672 with the light trap followed by hand (1.375) and the highest was 1.940 with sweeping net in Lamto’s habitats. The insect orders recorded with the hand were Heteroptera, Coleoptera, Homoptera, Hymenoptera, Orthoptera, Diptera and Isoptera (F = 11.340, P value = 0.006). Light trap was more suitable to capture Lepidoptera (3.250%), Coleoptera (0.750%) and Homoptera (0.500%) (F= 6.659, P value= 0.0001). The abundance index recorded with the sweeping net commonly varied between 0.0 and 18.250%. Both sweeping net and hand insect sampling techniques were the most efficient and showed the highest insect orders complementarity. However, the use of sweep net, hand sampling and light trap were recommended to have good collection of insects. \\n \\n   \\n \\n Key words: Sweep net, light trap, hand sampling, insects’ conservation, capture effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2020.1415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2020.1415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

昆虫具有重要的生态和经济意义。本研究比较了三种主要昆虫取样方法(扫网法、手采法和诱蚊灯法)的取样效率,并分析了兰托生境生物多样性的分布情况。共收集到9目379只。与手捕法和诱蚊灯法相比,扫网法捕获的个体数量更多。从捕获率来看,以扫网法最高(0.720),其次是手捕法(0.232)和诱蚊灯法(0.047)。灯诱法和扫网法的Shannon’s指数分别为0.672和1.375,最高为1.940。手记录昆虫目为异翅目、鞘翅目、同翅目、膜翅目、直翅目、双翅目和等翅目(F = 11.340, P值= 0.006)。灯诱对鳞翅目(3.250%)、鞘翅目(0.50%)和同翅目(0.500%)的捕获效果较好(F= 6.659, P值= 0.0001)。用扫网记录的丰度指数一般在0.0 ~ 18.250%之间。扫网法和手采法效率最高,昆虫目互补性最高。建议采用扫网、手采、灯诱等方法收集昆虫。关键词:扫网,灯诱,手采,昆虫保护,捕获效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiencies of three insect collection methods in Lamto, Cte dIvoire
Insects are of ecological and economic importance. This study was carried out to compare the efficiency of the three main insect sampling methods namely, sweep net, hand sampling and the light trap and also to show the biodiversity distribution from Lamto habitats for good biological conservation. A total of 379 individuals belonging to 9 orders were collected. Significantly, more individuals were collected by sweeping net compared to hand sampling and light trap. From the capture rate, highest rate was recorded for sweeping net (0.720) followed by hand (0.232) and light trap (0.047). The lowest value of Shannon’s index was 0.672 with the light trap followed by hand (1.375) and the highest was 1.940 with sweeping net in Lamto’s habitats. The insect orders recorded with the hand were Heteroptera, Coleoptera, Homoptera, Hymenoptera, Orthoptera, Diptera and Isoptera (F = 11.340, P value = 0.006). Light trap was more suitable to capture Lepidoptera (3.250%), Coleoptera (0.750%) and Homoptera (0.500%) (F= 6.659, P value= 0.0001). The abundance index recorded with the sweeping net commonly varied between 0.0 and 18.250%. Both sweeping net and hand insect sampling techniques were the most efficient and showed the highest insect orders complementarity. However, the use of sweep net, hand sampling and light trap were recommended to have good collection of insects.   Key words: Sweep net, light trap, hand sampling, insects’ conservation, capture effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信