突尼斯社区网络消费者意见行为案例

Chiraz Rouissi, Fatma Letaief
{"title":"突尼斯社区网络消费者意见行为案例","authors":"Chiraz Rouissi, Fatma Letaief","doi":"10.5430/RWE.V12N1P364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online consumer opinions are an essential source of information on goods and services, with the framework of a Research Online Purchase Offline behavior. However, in a virtual environment, there are two types of consumers: opinion leaders and \"lurkers\" who do not participate in virtual communities. This research presents the results of a qualitative study on the obstacles and motivations for the participation of \"lurkers\" in Social Media and especially case of Facebook groups. It shows that even though \"Lurkers\" consider virtual communities as a public space that can triturate their confidentiality, in some cases they can manifest themselves and give rise to new behavior, which is \"mobilizing behavior\". Background/Objectives: The main purpose of the research is to study and understand, through a preliminary qualitative study, the barriers, and motivations of passive users in a virtual community on Facebook. The theoretical scope of this research is based on a lack of theoretical work, addressing the barriers and motivations to convert a Lurker into an Opinion Leader (Vasic, N & al. 2019) in the context of Research Online Purchase Offline \"ROPO\" behavior. Methods/Statistical. Methodological tools of the research methods were qualitative, a survey based on an interview is conducted with a sample of the relevant population, namely, subsidiaries of Tunisian communities’ groups. Given the exploratory nature of this study, the choice of a qualitative analysis seems appropriate. The method of data collection through semi-structured interviews Findings: This study examined the literature on online behaviors and aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of Lurkers' behavior context through a qualitative exploratory study. The qualitative study shows that the \"Lurkers\" brakes are mainly around the fact that they want to protect their private lives by leaving as little data as possible so as not to receive abusive requests for additions, they try to keep some perspective to avoid any kind of conflict with strangers when it comes to different opinions. Improvements: This study can provide input at the managerial level, especially for creators of virtual communities. In practice, brands develop virtual communities intending to improve the \"consumer-brand\" relationship as well as the relationship between consumers. The obstacles for Lurkers to participate can give brands a clear idea of the need to develop engagement platforms. More specifically, the brand must give more opportunities to the lurkers to give their opinions so that they can participate without fear.","PeriodicalId":264194,"journal":{"name":"Research in World Economy","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Behavior of Online Consumer Opinions Case Tunisian Communities\",\"authors\":\"Chiraz Rouissi, Fatma Letaief\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/RWE.V12N1P364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online consumer opinions are an essential source of information on goods and services, with the framework of a Research Online Purchase Offline behavior. However, in a virtual environment, there are two types of consumers: opinion leaders and \\\"lurkers\\\" who do not participate in virtual communities. This research presents the results of a qualitative study on the obstacles and motivations for the participation of \\\"lurkers\\\" in Social Media and especially case of Facebook groups. It shows that even though \\\"Lurkers\\\" consider virtual communities as a public space that can triturate their confidentiality, in some cases they can manifest themselves and give rise to new behavior, which is \\\"mobilizing behavior\\\". Background/Objectives: The main purpose of the research is to study and understand, through a preliminary qualitative study, the barriers, and motivations of passive users in a virtual community on Facebook. The theoretical scope of this research is based on a lack of theoretical work, addressing the barriers and motivations to convert a Lurker into an Opinion Leader (Vasic, N & al. 2019) in the context of Research Online Purchase Offline \\\"ROPO\\\" behavior. Methods/Statistical. Methodological tools of the research methods were qualitative, a survey based on an interview is conducted with a sample of the relevant population, namely, subsidiaries of Tunisian communities’ groups. Given the exploratory nature of this study, the choice of a qualitative analysis seems appropriate. The method of data collection through semi-structured interviews Findings: This study examined the literature on online behaviors and aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of Lurkers' behavior context through a qualitative exploratory study. The qualitative study shows that the \\\"Lurkers\\\" brakes are mainly around the fact that they want to protect their private lives by leaving as little data as possible so as not to receive abusive requests for additions, they try to keep some perspective to avoid any kind of conflict with strangers when it comes to different opinions. Improvements: This study can provide input at the managerial level, especially for creators of virtual communities. In practice, brands develop virtual communities intending to improve the \\\"consumer-brand\\\" relationship as well as the relationship between consumers. The obstacles for Lurkers to participate can give brands a clear idea of the need to develop engagement platforms. More specifically, the brand must give more opportunities to the lurkers to give their opinions so that they can participate without fear.\",\"PeriodicalId\":264194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in World Economy\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in World Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/RWE.V12N1P364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in World Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/RWE.V12N1P364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线消费者意见是商品和服务信息的重要来源,其框架是研究在线购买离线行为。然而,在虚拟环境中,存在两种类型的消费者:意见领袖和不参与虚拟社区的“潜伏者”。本研究提出了一项关于“潜伏者”参与社交媒体的障碍和动机的定性研究结果,特别是Facebook小组的案例。这表明,即使“潜伏者”将虚拟社区视为一个可以嘲弄其保密性的公共空间,但在某些情况下,他们也可以表现出来并产生新的行为,这就是“动员行为”。背景/目的:本研究的主要目的是通过初步的定性研究,研究和理解Facebook虚拟社区中被动用户的障碍和动机。本研究的理论范围是基于缺乏理论工作,在研究在线购买离线“ROPO”行为的背景下,解决将潜伏者转化为意见领袖的障碍和动机(Vasic, N & al. 2019)。方法/统计。研究方法的方法工具是定性的,在访谈的基础上对有关人口样本进行调查,即突尼斯社区团体的附属机构。鉴于本研究的探索性,选择定性分析似乎是合适的。研究结果:本研究对网络行为相关文献进行了梳理,旨在通过定性探索性研究,全面了解潜伏者的行为背景。定性研究表明,“潜伏者”的刹车主要是围绕这样一个事实,即他们希望通过尽可能少地留下数据来保护自己的私人生活,以免收到辱骂性的添加请求,他们试图保持一些观点,以避免在不同意见时与陌生人发生任何冲突。改进:本研究可以提供管理层面的输入,特别是对虚拟社区的创建者。在实践中,品牌开发虚拟社区旨在改善“消费者-品牌”关系以及消费者之间的关系。潜伏者参与的障碍可以让品牌清楚地认识到开发互动平台的必要性。更具体地说,品牌必须给潜伏者更多机会发表意见,这样他们就可以毫无畏惧地参与进来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Behavior of Online Consumer Opinions Case Tunisian Communities
Online consumer opinions are an essential source of information on goods and services, with the framework of a Research Online Purchase Offline behavior. However, in a virtual environment, there are two types of consumers: opinion leaders and "lurkers" who do not participate in virtual communities. This research presents the results of a qualitative study on the obstacles and motivations for the participation of "lurkers" in Social Media and especially case of Facebook groups. It shows that even though "Lurkers" consider virtual communities as a public space that can triturate their confidentiality, in some cases they can manifest themselves and give rise to new behavior, which is "mobilizing behavior". Background/Objectives: The main purpose of the research is to study and understand, through a preliminary qualitative study, the barriers, and motivations of passive users in a virtual community on Facebook. The theoretical scope of this research is based on a lack of theoretical work, addressing the barriers and motivations to convert a Lurker into an Opinion Leader (Vasic, N & al. 2019) in the context of Research Online Purchase Offline "ROPO" behavior. Methods/Statistical. Methodological tools of the research methods were qualitative, a survey based on an interview is conducted with a sample of the relevant population, namely, subsidiaries of Tunisian communities’ groups. Given the exploratory nature of this study, the choice of a qualitative analysis seems appropriate. The method of data collection through semi-structured interviews Findings: This study examined the literature on online behaviors and aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of Lurkers' behavior context through a qualitative exploratory study. The qualitative study shows that the "Lurkers" brakes are mainly around the fact that they want to protect their private lives by leaving as little data as possible so as not to receive abusive requests for additions, they try to keep some perspective to avoid any kind of conflict with strangers when it comes to different opinions. Improvements: This study can provide input at the managerial level, especially for creators of virtual communities. In practice, brands develop virtual communities intending to improve the "consumer-brand" relationship as well as the relationship between consumers. The obstacles for Lurkers to participate can give brands a clear idea of the need to develop engagement platforms. More specifically, the brand must give more opportunities to the lurkers to give their opinions so that they can participate without fear.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信