采用认知演练方法评估知识领域可视化的可用性

Kenneth R. Allendoerfer, Serge Aluker, Gulshan Panjwani, Jason M. Proctor, David Sturtz, Mirjana Vukovic, Chaomei Chen
{"title":"采用认知演练方法评估知识领域可视化的可用性","authors":"Kenneth R. Allendoerfer, Serge Aluker, Gulshan Panjwani, Jason M. Proctor, David Sturtz, Mirjana Vukovic, Chaomei Chen","doi":"10.1109/INFVIS.2005.1532147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The usability of knowledge domain visualization (KDViz) tools can be assessed at several levels. Cognitive walkthrough (CW) is a well known usability inspection method that focuses on how easily users can learn software through exploration. Typical applications of CW follow structured tasks where user goals and action sequences that lead to achievement of the goals are well defined. KDViz and other information visualization tools, however, are typically designed for users to explore data and user goals and actions are less well understood. In this paper, we describe how the traditional CW method may be adapted for assessing the usability of these systems. We apply the adapted version of CW to CiteSpace, a KDViz tool that uses bibliometric analyses to create visualizations of scientific literatures. We describe usability issues identified by the adapted CW and discuss how CiteSpace supported the completion of tasks, such as identifying research fronts, and the achievement of goals. Finally, we discuss improvements to the adapted CW and issues to be addressed before applying it to a wider range of KDViz tools.","PeriodicalId":123643,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005.","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adapting the cognitive walkthrough method to assess the usability of a knowledge domain visualization\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth R. Allendoerfer, Serge Aluker, Gulshan Panjwani, Jason M. Proctor, David Sturtz, Mirjana Vukovic, Chaomei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INFVIS.2005.1532147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The usability of knowledge domain visualization (KDViz) tools can be assessed at several levels. Cognitive walkthrough (CW) is a well known usability inspection method that focuses on how easily users can learn software through exploration. Typical applications of CW follow structured tasks where user goals and action sequences that lead to achievement of the goals are well defined. KDViz and other information visualization tools, however, are typically designed for users to explore data and user goals and actions are less well understood. In this paper, we describe how the traditional CW method may be adapted for assessing the usability of these systems. We apply the adapted version of CW to CiteSpace, a KDViz tool that uses bibliometric analyses to create visualizations of scientific literatures. We describe usability issues identified by the adapted CW and discuss how CiteSpace supported the completion of tasks, such as identifying research fronts, and the achievement of goals. Finally, we discuss improvements to the adapted CW and issues to be addressed before applying it to a wider range of KDViz tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005.\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2005.1532147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2005.1532147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

知识领域可视化(KDViz)工具的可用性可以在几个层次上进行评估。认知演练(Cognitive walkthrough, CW)是一种著名的可用性检查方法,主要关注用户通过探索学习软件的难易程度。CW的典型应用遵循结构化任务,其中用户目标和导致目标实现的操作序列是明确定义的。然而,KDViz和其他信息可视化工具通常是为用户探索数据而设计的,用户的目标和操作没有得到很好的理解。在本文中,我们描述了传统的连续波方法如何适用于评估这些系统的可用性。我们将CW的改编版本应用于CiteSpace,这是一个使用文献计量学分析来创建科学文献可视化的KDViz工具。我们描述了改编后的知识库所发现的可用性问题,并讨论了CiteSpace如何支持任务的完成,如确定研究前沿和实现目标。最后,我们讨论了对已适应的CW的改进,以及在将其应用于更广泛的KDViz工具之前需要解决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adapting the cognitive walkthrough method to assess the usability of a knowledge domain visualization
The usability of knowledge domain visualization (KDViz) tools can be assessed at several levels. Cognitive walkthrough (CW) is a well known usability inspection method that focuses on how easily users can learn software through exploration. Typical applications of CW follow structured tasks where user goals and action sequences that lead to achievement of the goals are well defined. KDViz and other information visualization tools, however, are typically designed for users to explore data and user goals and actions are less well understood. In this paper, we describe how the traditional CW method may be adapted for assessing the usability of these systems. We apply the adapted version of CW to CiteSpace, a KDViz tool that uses bibliometric analyses to create visualizations of scientific literatures. We describe usability issues identified by the adapted CW and discuss how CiteSpace supported the completion of tasks, such as identifying research fronts, and the achievement of goals. Finally, we discuss improvements to the adapted CW and issues to be addressed before applying it to a wider range of KDViz tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信