骨水泥锚钉增强治疗骨质疏松性股骨骨折的安全性和有效性:系统综述

S. Y. Kim
{"title":"骨水泥锚钉增强治疗骨质疏松性股骨骨折的安全性和有效性:系统综述","authors":"S. Y. Kim","doi":"10.12671/JKFS.2019.32.2.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial support: This study was supported by research funds of the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Conflict of interests: None. Purpose: This paper reviewed the safety and effectiveness of anchor augmentation with bone cement in osteoporotic femoral fractures. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching multiple databases including five Korean databases, Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Safety was assessed through the incidence of complication. The effectiveness was assessed through the failure rate of anchor fixation, improvement of function and radiological assessment (sliding distance of lag screw and cutout). The safety and effectiveness of anchor augmentation with bone cement were assessed by reviewing all articles reporting on the treatment. Two researchers carried out independently each stage from the literature search to data extraction. The tools of Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Networks were used to assess the quality of studies. Results: Six studies were considered eligible. The safety results revealed a small amount of cement leakage (1 case), but no other severe complications were encountered. Regarding the effectiveness, the failure rate of anchor fixation was 16.7% and the Harris’s hip score showed no significant improvement. The sliding distance of the anchor was similar in the cement augmentation group and noncement group but there was no cutout. Conclusion: The results of the assessment suggest that the safety is acceptable, but further research will be needed to verify the effectiveness of the treatment.","PeriodicalId":436464,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Fracture Society","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Effectiveness of the Anchor Augmentation with Bone Cement on Osteoporotic Femoral Fracture: A Systematic Reviews\",\"authors\":\"S. Y. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.12671/JKFS.2019.32.2.89\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Financial support: This study was supported by research funds of the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Conflict of interests: None. Purpose: This paper reviewed the safety and effectiveness of anchor augmentation with bone cement in osteoporotic femoral fractures. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching multiple databases including five Korean databases, Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Safety was assessed through the incidence of complication. The effectiveness was assessed through the failure rate of anchor fixation, improvement of function and radiological assessment (sliding distance of lag screw and cutout). The safety and effectiveness of anchor augmentation with bone cement were assessed by reviewing all articles reporting on the treatment. Two researchers carried out independently each stage from the literature search to data extraction. The tools of Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Networks were used to assess the quality of studies. Results: Six studies were considered eligible. The safety results revealed a small amount of cement leakage (1 case), but no other severe complications were encountered. Regarding the effectiveness, the failure rate of anchor fixation was 16.7% and the Harris’s hip score showed no significant improvement. The sliding distance of the anchor was similar in the cement augmentation group and noncement group but there was no cutout. Conclusion: The results of the assessment suggest that the safety is acceptable, but further research will be needed to verify the effectiveness of the treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Fracture Society\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Fracture Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12671/JKFS.2019.32.2.89\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Fracture Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12671/JKFS.2019.32.2.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

财政支持:本研究由厚生劳动省研究基金资助。利益冲突:无。目的:综述骨水泥锚钉加固治疗骨质疏松性股骨骨折的安全性和有效性。材料与方法:检索5个韩文数据库、Ovid-MEDLINE、Ovid-EMBASE、Cochrane Library等数据库进行系统评价。通过并发症的发生率来评估安全性。通过锚钉固定失败率、功能改善情况及影像学评价(拉力螺钉和切口滑动距离)评估疗效。通过回顾所有报道该治疗的文章,评估骨水泥锚钉增强的安全性和有效性。从文献检索到数据提取,每个阶段由两位研究者独立完成。使用苏格兰校际指导网络的工具来评估研究的质量。结果:6项研究被认为符合条件。安全结果显示水泥少量渗漏(1例),但未发生其他严重并发症。在疗效方面,锚钉固定失败率为16.7%,Harris髋关节评分无明显改善。锚固增强组与非锚固组锚固体滑动距离相近,但锚固体无切口。结论:评价结果表明,安全性是可以接受的,但需要进一步的研究来验证治疗的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and Effectiveness of the Anchor Augmentation with Bone Cement on Osteoporotic Femoral Fracture: A Systematic Reviews
Financial support: This study was supported by research funds of the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Conflict of interests: None. Purpose: This paper reviewed the safety and effectiveness of anchor augmentation with bone cement in osteoporotic femoral fractures. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching multiple databases including five Korean databases, Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Safety was assessed through the incidence of complication. The effectiveness was assessed through the failure rate of anchor fixation, improvement of function and radiological assessment (sliding distance of lag screw and cutout). The safety and effectiveness of anchor augmentation with bone cement were assessed by reviewing all articles reporting on the treatment. Two researchers carried out independently each stage from the literature search to data extraction. The tools of Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Networks were used to assess the quality of studies. Results: Six studies were considered eligible. The safety results revealed a small amount of cement leakage (1 case), but no other severe complications were encountered. Regarding the effectiveness, the failure rate of anchor fixation was 16.7% and the Harris’s hip score showed no significant improvement. The sliding distance of the anchor was similar in the cement augmentation group and noncement group but there was no cutout. Conclusion: The results of the assessment suggest that the safety is acceptable, but further research will be needed to verify the effectiveness of the treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信