伊斯兰和印度尼西亚刑法下的盗窃罪

Zulfiani Ayu Astutik, Muhammad Rafif Wibowo, Ahmad Fahmi Ilham Mulloh, Adilla Putri Diva
{"title":"伊斯兰和印度尼西亚刑法下的盗窃罪","authors":"Zulfiani Ayu Astutik, Muhammad Rafif Wibowo, Ahmad Fahmi Ilham Mulloh, Adilla Putri Diva","doi":"10.18196/iclr.v5i1.15124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theft  violates both  legal and religious norms  and it is a crime  under Islamic and Indonesian Criminal Law .  The study aims at comparing the regulation of theft both in Indonesia and in Islam. This normative legal research relies on secondary data and employs comparative approach. Comparison is made to explore the similarities and differences between Islamic criminal law and Indonesian criminal law with regard to theft especially on how this crime defined, the form of punishment , the requirement for imposing the punishments, and how effective are these punishment to deterring people from committing theft. The results of the study show that the use of imprisonment for theft as adopted in the Indonesian Penal Code seems to be ineffective for controlling theft cases. Hadd punishment as introduced in Islamic criminal law seems to be more promising for addressing the increasing number of theft cases. This is so because the application of cutting hand off not only prevents the thief to repeat the crime  but also  preventing others to do the same. Therefore, both special and general deterrence purposes are satisfied.","PeriodicalId":298750,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Comparative Law Review","volume":"2012 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theft under Islamic and Indonesian Criminal Law\",\"authors\":\"Zulfiani Ayu Astutik, Muhammad Rafif Wibowo, Ahmad Fahmi Ilham Mulloh, Adilla Putri Diva\",\"doi\":\"10.18196/iclr.v5i1.15124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theft  violates both  legal and religious norms  and it is a crime  under Islamic and Indonesian Criminal Law .  The study aims at comparing the regulation of theft both in Indonesia and in Islam. This normative legal research relies on secondary data and employs comparative approach. Comparison is made to explore the similarities and differences between Islamic criminal law and Indonesian criminal law with regard to theft especially on how this crime defined, the form of punishment , the requirement for imposing the punishments, and how effective are these punishment to deterring people from committing theft. The results of the study show that the use of imprisonment for theft as adopted in the Indonesian Penal Code seems to be ineffective for controlling theft cases. Hadd punishment as introduced in Islamic criminal law seems to be more promising for addressing the increasing number of theft cases. This is so because the application of cutting hand off not only prevents the thief to repeat the crime  but also  preventing others to do the same. Therefore, both special and general deterrence purposes are satisfied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Comparative Law Review\",\"volume\":\"2012 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Comparative Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v5i1.15124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Comparative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v5i1.15124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

盗窃违反了法律和宗教规范,根据伊斯兰和印度尼西亚刑法,这是一种犯罪行为。这项研究的目的是比较印度尼西亚和伊斯兰教对盗窃的监管。这种规范性法律研究依赖于二手数据并采用比较方法。本文比较了伊斯兰刑法和印度尼西亚刑法在盗窃方面的异同,特别是在如何界定这一罪行、惩罚的形式、施加惩罚的要求以及这些惩罚对阻止人们盗窃的效果如何等方面。这项研究的结果表明,印度尼西亚《刑法典》所采用的对盗窃使用监禁的办法似乎对控制盗窃案件无效。伊斯兰刑法中引入的哈德惩罚似乎更有希望解决日益增多的盗窃案件。之所以如此,是因为砍手的应用不仅可以防止小偷再次犯罪,而且可以防止其他人也这样做。因此,既满足了特殊威慑目的,又满足了一般威慑目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theft under Islamic and Indonesian Criminal Law
Theft  violates both  legal and religious norms  and it is a crime  under Islamic and Indonesian Criminal Law .  The study aims at comparing the regulation of theft both in Indonesia and in Islam. This normative legal research relies on secondary data and employs comparative approach. Comparison is made to explore the similarities and differences between Islamic criminal law and Indonesian criminal law with regard to theft especially on how this crime defined, the form of punishment , the requirement for imposing the punishments, and how effective are these punishment to deterring people from committing theft. The results of the study show that the use of imprisonment for theft as adopted in the Indonesian Penal Code seems to be ineffective for controlling theft cases. Hadd punishment as introduced in Islamic criminal law seems to be more promising for addressing the increasing number of theft cases. This is so because the application of cutting hand off not only prevents the thief to repeat the crime  but also  preventing others to do the same. Therefore, both special and general deterrence purposes are satisfied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信