视频中局部失真的感知标注:工具和数据集

Andréas Pastor, P. Le Callet
{"title":"视频中局部失真的感知标注:工具和数据集","authors":"Andréas Pastor, P. Le Callet","doi":"10.1145/3587819.3592559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To assess the quality of multimedia content, create datasets, and train objective quality metrics, one needs to collect subjective opinions from annotators. Different subjective methodologies exist, from direct rating with single or double stimuli to indirect rating with pairwise comparisons. Triplet and quadruplet-based comparisons are a type of indirect rating. From these comparisons and preferences on stimuli, we can place the assessed stimuli on a perceptual scale (e.g., from low to high quality). Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling (MLDS) solver is one of these algorithms working with triplets and quadruplets. A participant is asked to compare intervals inside pairs of stimuli: (a,b) and (c,d), where a,b,c,d are stimuli forming a quadruplet. However, one limitation is that the perceptual scales retrieved from stimuli of different contents are usually not comparable. We previously offered a solution to measure the inter-content scale of multiple contents. This paper presents an open-source python implementation of the method and demonstrates its use on three datasets collected in an in-lab environment. We compared the accuracy and effectiveness of the method using pairwise, triplet, and quadruplet for intra-content annotations. The code is available here: https://github.com/andreaspastor/MLDS_inter_content_scaling.","PeriodicalId":330983,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th Conference on ACM Multimedia Systems","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptual annotation of local distortions in videos: tools and datasets\",\"authors\":\"Andréas Pastor, P. Le Callet\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3587819.3592559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To assess the quality of multimedia content, create datasets, and train objective quality metrics, one needs to collect subjective opinions from annotators. Different subjective methodologies exist, from direct rating with single or double stimuli to indirect rating with pairwise comparisons. Triplet and quadruplet-based comparisons are a type of indirect rating. From these comparisons and preferences on stimuli, we can place the assessed stimuli on a perceptual scale (e.g., from low to high quality). Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling (MLDS) solver is one of these algorithms working with triplets and quadruplets. A participant is asked to compare intervals inside pairs of stimuli: (a,b) and (c,d), where a,b,c,d are stimuli forming a quadruplet. However, one limitation is that the perceptual scales retrieved from stimuli of different contents are usually not comparable. We previously offered a solution to measure the inter-content scale of multiple contents. This paper presents an open-source python implementation of the method and demonstrates its use on three datasets collected in an in-lab environment. We compared the accuracy and effectiveness of the method using pairwise, triplet, and quadruplet for intra-content annotations. The code is available here: https://github.com/andreaspastor/MLDS_inter_content_scaling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 14th Conference on ACM Multimedia Systems\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 14th Conference on ACM Multimedia Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3587819.3592559\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th Conference on ACM Multimedia Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3587819.3592559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了评估多媒体内容的质量,创建数据集,并训练客观的质量指标,需要从注释者那里收集主观意见。存在不同的主观评价方法,从单一或双重刺激的直接评价到两两比较的间接评价。基于三联体和四联体的比较是一种间接评级。从这些对刺激的比较和偏好中,我们可以将评估的刺激置于感知尺度上(例如,从低质量到高质量)。最大似然差标度(MLDS)求解器是处理三联体和四联体的算法之一。参与者被要求比较刺激对内的间隔:(A,b)和(c,d),其中A,b,c,d是组成四连音的刺激。然而,一个限制是,从不同内容的刺激中检索到的知觉尺度通常不具有可比性。我们之前提供了一个测量多个内容间内容规模的解决方案。本文介绍了该方法的一个开源python实现,并演示了它在实验室环境中收集的三个数据集上的使用。我们比较了使用两两、三联体和四联体的内容内注释方法的准确性和有效性。代码可从这里获得:https://github.com/andreaspastor/MLDS_inter_content_scaling。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptual annotation of local distortions in videos: tools and datasets
To assess the quality of multimedia content, create datasets, and train objective quality metrics, one needs to collect subjective opinions from annotators. Different subjective methodologies exist, from direct rating with single or double stimuli to indirect rating with pairwise comparisons. Triplet and quadruplet-based comparisons are a type of indirect rating. From these comparisons and preferences on stimuli, we can place the assessed stimuli on a perceptual scale (e.g., from low to high quality). Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling (MLDS) solver is one of these algorithms working with triplets and quadruplets. A participant is asked to compare intervals inside pairs of stimuli: (a,b) and (c,d), where a,b,c,d are stimuli forming a quadruplet. However, one limitation is that the perceptual scales retrieved from stimuli of different contents are usually not comparable. We previously offered a solution to measure the inter-content scale of multiple contents. This paper presents an open-source python implementation of the method and demonstrates its use on three datasets collected in an in-lab environment. We compared the accuracy and effectiveness of the method using pairwise, triplet, and quadruplet for intra-content annotations. The code is available here: https://github.com/andreaspastor/MLDS_inter_content_scaling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信