2017年MK - 13 - PUU-XV关于婚姻禁止的分析

Fitriyani Fitriyani, Ro’fah Setyowati
{"title":"2017年MK - 13 - PUU-XV关于婚姻禁止的分析","authors":"Fitriyani Fitriyani, Ro’fah Setyowati","doi":"10.35719/IJL.V3I1.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Decision of Constitutional Court No 13/PUU-XV/2017 caused change in the Chapter 153 A Paragraph (1) Letter F of UUK about the prohibition marriage terhadap the colleagues. But the problem, is The Decision of Constitutional Court has fulfilled citizen’s constitutional right. The research uses doctrinal approach.The specification of this study is descriptive analysis. The result of analysis indicate that consideration UUD NRI 1945 and human right bill permitting that rule, whereas UUP doesn’t regulate it. However, Islam doesn’t forbit this regulation exactly but conditionaly the time, place, and situation. Based on maqashid al-syari’ah approach indicated that constitutional court judge in his deciding matter not according to principle of maqashid al-syari’ah. Therefore, the Decision of Constitutional Court No 13/PUU-XV/2017 hasn’t fulfilled citizen’s constitutional right.","PeriodicalId":400525,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Law and Islamic Law (IJLIL)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS PUTUSAN MK NO 13/PUU-XV/2017 TENTANG LARANGAN NIKAH DALAM SATU INSTANSI PERSPEKTIF MAQASHID AL-SYARI’AH\",\"authors\":\"Fitriyani Fitriyani, Ro’fah Setyowati\",\"doi\":\"10.35719/IJL.V3I1.110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Decision of Constitutional Court No 13/PUU-XV/2017 caused change in the Chapter 153 A Paragraph (1) Letter F of UUK about the prohibition marriage terhadap the colleagues. But the problem, is The Decision of Constitutional Court has fulfilled citizen’s constitutional right. The research uses doctrinal approach.The specification of this study is descriptive analysis. The result of analysis indicate that consideration UUD NRI 1945 and human right bill permitting that rule, whereas UUP doesn’t regulate it. However, Islam doesn’t forbit this regulation exactly but conditionaly the time, place, and situation. Based on maqashid al-syari’ah approach indicated that constitutional court judge in his deciding matter not according to principle of maqashid al-syari’ah. Therefore, the Decision of Constitutional Court No 13/PUU-XV/2017 hasn’t fulfilled citizen’s constitutional right.\",\"PeriodicalId\":400525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Law and Islamic Law (IJLIL)\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Law and Islamic Law (IJLIL)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35719/IJL.V3I1.110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Law and Islamic Law (IJLIL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35719/IJL.V3I1.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

第13/PUU-XV/2017号宪法法院的决定导致英国第153章A段(1)F字母关于禁止同性婚姻的变化。但问题在于,宪法法院的判决是否履行了公民的宪法权利。本研究采用理论方法。本研究的规范是描述性分析。分析结果表明,考虑到UUD NRI 1945和人权法案允许该规则,而UUP没有对其进行规范。然而,伊斯兰教并没有完全禁止这种规定,而是有条件地禁止了时间、地点和情况。基于伊斯兰教的做法表明,宪法法院法官在其裁决事项时没有按照伊斯兰教原则行事。因此,宪法法院第13/PUU-XV/2017号判决未能履行公民的宪法权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS PUTUSAN MK NO 13/PUU-XV/2017 TENTANG LARANGAN NIKAH DALAM SATU INSTANSI PERSPEKTIF MAQASHID AL-SYARI’AH
The Decision of Constitutional Court No 13/PUU-XV/2017 caused change in the Chapter 153 A Paragraph (1) Letter F of UUK about the prohibition marriage terhadap the colleagues. But the problem, is The Decision of Constitutional Court has fulfilled citizen’s constitutional right. The research uses doctrinal approach.The specification of this study is descriptive analysis. The result of analysis indicate that consideration UUD NRI 1945 and human right bill permitting that rule, whereas UUP doesn’t regulate it. However, Islam doesn’t forbit this regulation exactly but conditionaly the time, place, and situation. Based on maqashid al-syari’ah approach indicated that constitutional court judge in his deciding matter not according to principle of maqashid al-syari’ah. Therefore, the Decision of Constitutional Court No 13/PUU-XV/2017 hasn’t fulfilled citizen’s constitutional right.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信