在问题解决课程中从纸质作业过渡到在线作业的好处

Ali Hosseini, Caroline Ferguson
{"title":"在问题解决课程中从纸质作业过渡到在线作业的好处","authors":"Ali Hosseini, Caroline Ferguson","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi.15871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students registered in numerical-based problem-solving courses are often given a number of assignments to complete independently in order to demonstrate and refine their problem-solving skills. Traditionally, these assignments are paper-based and all students receive the same problems to solve; thus, they often rely heavily on their peers or on solution manuals to complete their assignments. As a result, assignment grades are typically high, but do not correlate with test or exam performance. \nIn this paper, we describe the use of Numbas, an open educational resource created by the University of Newcastle, England, as a customizable, online assignment system. Using Numbas, each student is provided with a unique set of problems, each with randomly generated values. While they are still allowed to work collaboratively with their peers, this randomization encourages students to develop their critical thinking skills to solve unique problems. To identify if the use of the online assignment system is correlated with enhanced performance, final exam grades earned by students who were exposed to either the paper-based or the online assignment system were compared. \nFurthermore, data from student feedback surveys were analyzed to identify student-perceived strengths and challenges associated with the online assignment system, and to determine possible opportunities for improvement. The study demonstrated an improvement in knowledge-based skills among students who were exposed to the online assignment system, compared to those who wrote paper assignments. However, no significant improvement in problem-solving skills was observed. Similar findings have been reported by other research works studied the same concept. Further, 88% of students surveyed reported that the online assignment system improved their learning experience. ","PeriodicalId":314914,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","volume":"165 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits of Transitioning from Paper-Based to Online Assignments in Problem Solving Courses\",\"authors\":\"Ali Hosseini, Caroline Ferguson\",\"doi\":\"10.24908/pceea.vi.15871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Students registered in numerical-based problem-solving courses are often given a number of assignments to complete independently in order to demonstrate and refine their problem-solving skills. Traditionally, these assignments are paper-based and all students receive the same problems to solve; thus, they often rely heavily on their peers or on solution manuals to complete their assignments. As a result, assignment grades are typically high, but do not correlate with test or exam performance. \\nIn this paper, we describe the use of Numbas, an open educational resource created by the University of Newcastle, England, as a customizable, online assignment system. Using Numbas, each student is provided with a unique set of problems, each with randomly generated values. While they are still allowed to work collaboratively with their peers, this randomization encourages students to develop their critical thinking skills to solve unique problems. To identify if the use of the online assignment system is correlated with enhanced performance, final exam grades earned by students who were exposed to either the paper-based or the online assignment system were compared. \\nFurthermore, data from student feedback surveys were analyzed to identify student-perceived strengths and challenges associated with the online assignment system, and to determine possible opportunities for improvement. The study demonstrated an improvement in knowledge-based skills among students who were exposed to the online assignment system, compared to those who wrote paper assignments. However, no significant improvement in problem-solving skills was observed. Similar findings have been reported by other research works studied the same concept. Further, 88% of students surveyed reported that the online assignment system improved their learning experience. \",\"PeriodicalId\":314914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)\",\"volume\":\"165 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi.15871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi.15871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在以数字为基础的问题解决课程中注册的学生经常被要求独立完成一些作业,以展示和完善他们解决问题的技能。传统上,这些作业是基于纸上的,所有学生都要解决同样的问题;因此,他们经常严重依赖他们的同伴或解决方案手册来完成他们的任务。因此,作业成绩通常很高,但与考试或考试成绩无关。在本文中,我们描述了Numbas的使用,这是一个由英国纽卡斯尔大学创建的开放教育资源,作为一个可定制的在线作业系统。使用Numbas,每个学生都有一组独特的问题,每个问题都有随机生成的值。虽然他们仍然被允许与同龄人合作,但这种随机化鼓励学生发展他们的批判性思维技能,以解决独特的问题。为了确定使用在线作业系统是否与提高成绩相关,比较了使用纸质作业系统或在线作业系统的学生的期末考试成绩。此外,我们还分析了来自学生反馈调查的数据,以确定学生对在线作业系统的优势和挑战,并确定可能的改进机会。研究表明,与那些写书面作业的学生相比,接触在线作业系统的学生在知识技能方面有了提高。然而,在解决问题的能力上并没有明显的提高。其他研究同样概念的工作也报告了类似的发现。此外,88%的受访学生表示,在线作业系统改善了他们的学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benefits of Transitioning from Paper-Based to Online Assignments in Problem Solving Courses
Students registered in numerical-based problem-solving courses are often given a number of assignments to complete independently in order to demonstrate and refine their problem-solving skills. Traditionally, these assignments are paper-based and all students receive the same problems to solve; thus, they often rely heavily on their peers or on solution manuals to complete their assignments. As a result, assignment grades are typically high, but do not correlate with test or exam performance. In this paper, we describe the use of Numbas, an open educational resource created by the University of Newcastle, England, as a customizable, online assignment system. Using Numbas, each student is provided with a unique set of problems, each with randomly generated values. While they are still allowed to work collaboratively with their peers, this randomization encourages students to develop their critical thinking skills to solve unique problems. To identify if the use of the online assignment system is correlated with enhanced performance, final exam grades earned by students who were exposed to either the paper-based or the online assignment system were compared. Furthermore, data from student feedback surveys were analyzed to identify student-perceived strengths and challenges associated with the online assignment system, and to determine possible opportunities for improvement. The study demonstrated an improvement in knowledge-based skills among students who were exposed to the online assignment system, compared to those who wrote paper assignments. However, no significant improvement in problem-solving skills was observed. Similar findings have been reported by other research works studied the same concept. Further, 88% of students surveyed reported that the online assignment system improved their learning experience. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信