用评估分数解释学习进度:有什么好处?

Nathan Zoanetti
{"title":"用评估分数解释学习进度:有什么好处?","authors":"Nathan Zoanetti","doi":"10.37517/978-1-74286-638-3_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using assessment scores to quantify gains and growth trajectories for individuals and groups can provide a valuable lens on learning progress for all students. This paper summarises some commonly observed patterns of progress and illustrates these using data from ACER’s Progressive Achievement Test (PAT) assessments. While growth trajectory measurement requires scores for the same individuals over at least three but preferably more occasions, scores from only two occasions are naturally more readily available. The difference between two successive scores is usually referred to as gain. Some common approaches and pitfalls when interpreting individual student gain data are illustrated. It is concluded that pairs of consecutive scores are best considered as part of a longer-term trajectory of learning progress, and that caveated gain information might at best play a peripheral role until additional scores are available for individuals. This review is part of a larger program of research to inform future reporting developments at ACER.","PeriodicalId":413895,"journal":{"name":"Research Conference 2021: Excellent progress for every student: Proceedings and Program","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpreting learning progress using assessment scores: what is there to gain?\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Zoanetti\",\"doi\":\"10.37517/978-1-74286-638-3_17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using assessment scores to quantify gains and growth trajectories for individuals and groups can provide a valuable lens on learning progress for all students. This paper summarises some commonly observed patterns of progress and illustrates these using data from ACER’s Progressive Achievement Test (PAT) assessments. While growth trajectory measurement requires scores for the same individuals over at least three but preferably more occasions, scores from only two occasions are naturally more readily available. The difference between two successive scores is usually referred to as gain. Some common approaches and pitfalls when interpreting individual student gain data are illustrated. It is concluded that pairs of consecutive scores are best considered as part of a longer-term trajectory of learning progress, and that caveated gain information might at best play a peripheral role until additional scores are available for individuals. This review is part of a larger program of research to inform future reporting developments at ACER.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Conference 2021: Excellent progress for every student: Proceedings and Program\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Conference 2021: Excellent progress for every student: Proceedings and Program\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-638-3_17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Conference 2021: Excellent progress for every student: Proceedings and Program","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-638-3_17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用评估分数来量化个人和团体的收益和成长轨迹,可以为所有学生的学习进展提供一个有价值的视角。本文总结了一些普遍观察到的进步模式,并使用ACER的进步成就测试(PAT)评估数据来说明这些模式。虽然成长轨迹测量需要同一个人在至少三个(最好是更多)场合的得分,但只有两个场合的得分自然更容易获得。两个连续分数之间的差通常被称为增益。一些常见的方法和陷阱时,解释个别学生的增益数据说明。我们得出的结论是,成对的连续分数最好被视为学习进展的长期轨迹的一部分,而附加的增益信息最多只能发挥外围作用,直到个人获得额外的分数。本综述是一项更大的研究计划的一部分,旨在为ACER未来的报告发展提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interpreting learning progress using assessment scores: what is there to gain?
Using assessment scores to quantify gains and growth trajectories for individuals and groups can provide a valuable lens on learning progress for all students. This paper summarises some commonly observed patterns of progress and illustrates these using data from ACER’s Progressive Achievement Test (PAT) assessments. While growth trajectory measurement requires scores for the same individuals over at least three but preferably more occasions, scores from only two occasions are naturally more readily available. The difference between two successive scores is usually referred to as gain. Some common approaches and pitfalls when interpreting individual student gain data are illustrated. It is concluded that pairs of consecutive scores are best considered as part of a longer-term trajectory of learning progress, and that caveated gain information might at best play a peripheral role until additional scores are available for individuals. This review is part of a larger program of research to inform future reporting developments at ACER.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信