神经周围和筋膜平面导管-如何解决扭结

M. Narayanan, S. Phillips
{"title":"神经周围和筋膜平面导管-如何解决扭结","authors":"M. Narayanan, S. Phillips","doi":"10.13107/jaccr.2018.v04i02.098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At our hospital, we have a growing regional anaesthesia service providing over 400 peripheral nerve or fascial plane catheters so far in 2017. We have recently had 2 episodes where rectus sheath catheters, which are our first line pain management for midline laparotomies, have become knotted whilst in situ and therefore been difficult to remove. One catheter required a small surgical incision (on the ward under local anaesthetic) to remove it, whilst the other was removed using artery forceps. Both were found to be knotted after removal from the patient (see picture). On both occasions the insertion of the catheter had not been documented. At out institution, most rectus sheath catheters are inserted by an anaesthetist using ultrasound, however some are placed at the end of the operation, by the surgeon under direct vision. It is well known that perineural and fascial plane catheters may kink and knot, however this is a rare phenomenon with an incidence of 0.13% [1]. Our recent problems have caused us to re-think our practice and highlight some key issues. Documentation of any procedure is essential. When the same procedure maybe carried out by 2 specialities documentation is potentially even more important. The surgeons at our institution often suture the rectus sheath catheters after insertion, whereas anaesthetists do not. This information is key when attempting to remove the catheter. We have changed our practice, so that any rectus sheath catheter (inserted by either surgeon or anaesthetist) will now be documented by the anaesthetist within the notes (although, obviously, it would be expected that the surgeons do document any procedure they perform). The decision for this was prompted by the fact that anaesthetists are the first port of call when a rectus sheath catheter is difficult to remove, and we needed a mechanism to improve access to information as to how the catheter had been secured. We routinely leave rectus sheath catheters in for 3-5 days. After this amount of time, we would expect that they may be easily removed with minimal resistance. If there is any difficulty in removing the catheter first line management should be to flush the catheter with 10 mls of 0.9% saline, to make space around the catheter and dislodge any fibrous tissue attached to the catheter. This may fail if the catheter is knotted as the catheter is often occluded. We would then advocate using artery forceps to grasp the most proximal exposed part of the catheter, allowing increased tension and better manipulation of the angle at which force is applied to the catheter. If this fails surgical exploration may be required, depending on how much catheter is left in the patient, this may be done in a ward based setting as opposed to a return to theatre. Fluoroscopy guided catheter removal has also been described [1]. We have now changed our practice with regards to how much catheter is left in situ. The optimal length of rectus sheath catheter insertion (or any fascial plane catheter) is unknown. Case reports of knotted perineural catheters imply that if more than 10cm of catheter is inserted it will increase the likelihood of kinking [2,3,4]. Our practice was to insert as much as possible, up to 15cm, however on reflection this probably increased the chance of knotting of the catheter. Our catheters have multiple orifices at the distal 3cm, and we now routinely only leave 5cm in situ; allowing adequate catheter for infusion of local anaesthetic, without excess catheters to kink and knot. Exact mechanisms that cause catheters to kink is unknown, but the most likely risk factor is a long length of catheter inserted either around the nerve or within a fascial plane. Our current catheters, PlexoLong 20g (Pajunk , Germany), are notably stiffer than others we have used, such as the Portex 20g Nylon epidural catheters (Smiths Medical, USA). This may also lead to an increased risk of knotting as they are more likely to kink when pushed up against resistance, such as a fascial plane. Kinked and knotted catheters are rare complications. With the increasing applications of continuous peripheral nerve and fascial plane catheters this is an important issue and knowledge of management of a difficult to retrieve catheter is essential.","PeriodicalId":448126,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Reports","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perineural and fascial plane catheters- how to iron out the kinks\",\"authors\":\"M. Narayanan, S. Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.13107/jaccr.2018.v04i02.098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At our hospital, we have a growing regional anaesthesia service providing over 400 peripheral nerve or fascial plane catheters so far in 2017. We have recently had 2 episodes where rectus sheath catheters, which are our first line pain management for midline laparotomies, have become knotted whilst in situ and therefore been difficult to remove. One catheter required a small surgical incision (on the ward under local anaesthetic) to remove it, whilst the other was removed using artery forceps. Both were found to be knotted after removal from the patient (see picture). On both occasions the insertion of the catheter had not been documented. At out institution, most rectus sheath catheters are inserted by an anaesthetist using ultrasound, however some are placed at the end of the operation, by the surgeon under direct vision. It is well known that perineural and fascial plane catheters may kink and knot, however this is a rare phenomenon with an incidence of 0.13% [1]. Our recent problems have caused us to re-think our practice and highlight some key issues. Documentation of any procedure is essential. When the same procedure maybe carried out by 2 specialities documentation is potentially even more important. The surgeons at our institution often suture the rectus sheath catheters after insertion, whereas anaesthetists do not. This information is key when attempting to remove the catheter. We have changed our practice, so that any rectus sheath catheter (inserted by either surgeon or anaesthetist) will now be documented by the anaesthetist within the notes (although, obviously, it would be expected that the surgeons do document any procedure they perform). The decision for this was prompted by the fact that anaesthetists are the first port of call when a rectus sheath catheter is difficult to remove, and we needed a mechanism to improve access to information as to how the catheter had been secured. We routinely leave rectus sheath catheters in for 3-5 days. After this amount of time, we would expect that they may be easily removed with minimal resistance. If there is any difficulty in removing the catheter first line management should be to flush the catheter with 10 mls of 0.9% saline, to make space around the catheter and dislodge any fibrous tissue attached to the catheter. This may fail if the catheter is knotted as the catheter is often occluded. We would then advocate using artery forceps to grasp the most proximal exposed part of the catheter, allowing increased tension and better manipulation of the angle at which force is applied to the catheter. If this fails surgical exploration may be required, depending on how much catheter is left in the patient, this may be done in a ward based setting as opposed to a return to theatre. Fluoroscopy guided catheter removal has also been described [1]. We have now changed our practice with regards to how much catheter is left in situ. The optimal length of rectus sheath catheter insertion (or any fascial plane catheter) is unknown. Case reports of knotted perineural catheters imply that if more than 10cm of catheter is inserted it will increase the likelihood of kinking [2,3,4]. Our practice was to insert as much as possible, up to 15cm, however on reflection this probably increased the chance of knotting of the catheter. Our catheters have multiple orifices at the distal 3cm, and we now routinely only leave 5cm in situ; allowing adequate catheter for infusion of local anaesthetic, without excess catheters to kink and knot. Exact mechanisms that cause catheters to kink is unknown, but the most likely risk factor is a long length of catheter inserted either around the nerve or within a fascial plane. Our current catheters, PlexoLong 20g (Pajunk , Germany), are notably stiffer than others we have used, such as the Portex 20g Nylon epidural catheters (Smiths Medical, USA). This may also lead to an increased risk of knotting as they are more likely to kink when pushed up against resistance, such as a fascial plane. Kinked and knotted catheters are rare complications. With the increasing applications of continuous peripheral nerve and fascial plane catheters this is an important issue and knowledge of management of a difficult to retrieve catheter is essential.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Reports\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13107/jaccr.2018.v04i02.098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jaccr.2018.v04i02.098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在我们医院,我们有一个不断增长的区域麻醉服务,到目前为止,2017年提供了400多个周围神经或筋膜平面导管。我们最近有2例直肌鞘导管的病例,直肌鞘导管是我们中线剖腹手术的第一线疼痛处理方法,在原位时发生打结,因此难以取出。一根导管需要一个小手术切口(在局部麻醉下)取出,而另一根导管则使用动脉钳取出。从病人身上取出后,发现两者都打结了(见图)。在这两种情况下,导管的插入都没有记录。在我们的机构,大多数直肌鞘导管是由麻醉师使用超声插入的,但有些是在手术结束时由外科医生在直视下放置的。众所周知,神经周围和筋膜平面导管可能会发生扭结,但这是一种罕见的现象,发生率为0.13%[1]。我们最近的问题促使我们重新思考我们的做法,并突出一些关键问题。任何程序的文件都是必要的。当相同的程序可能由两个专业执行时,文档可能更加重要。本院的外科医生经常在插入直肌鞘导管后缝合,而麻醉师则不这样做。当试图取出导管时,这些信息是关键。我们已经改变了我们的做法,因此任何直肌鞘导管(由外科医生或麻醉师插入)现在都将由麻醉师在笔记中记录(尽管,显然,外科医生会记录他们执行的任何手术)。这一决定是由于当直肌鞘导管难以移除时麻醉师是第一个呼叫端口,我们需要一种机制来改善获取导管如何固定的信息。我们通常将直肌鞘导管放置3-5天。在这段时间之后,我们预计它们可以很容易地以最小的阻力被移除。如果取出导管有任何困难,一线处理应是用10毫升0.9%生理盐水冲洗导管,在导管周围腾出空间,并清除附着在导管上的任何纤维组织。如果导管经常被阻塞而打结,这可能会失败。然后,我们建议使用动脉钳抓住导管最近端的暴露部分,这样可以增加张力并更好地控制对导管施加力的角度。如果失败,可能需要手术探查,这取决于患者体内剩余导管的多少,这可能在病房进行,而不是返回手术室。透视引导下的导管拔除也有报道[1]。我们现在已经改变了我们的做法关于在原位留下多少导管。直肌鞘导管(或任何筋膜平面导管)的最佳插入长度尚不清楚。神经周围导管打结的病例报告表明,如果导管插入超过10cm,将增加打结的可能性[2,3,4]。我们的做法是尽可能多地插入,最多15cm,然而反思这可能增加了导管打结的机会。我们的导管在远端3cm处有多个孔,现在我们通常只在原位留下5cm;允许足够的导管输注局部麻醉剂,没有多余的导管打结。导致导管扭结的确切机制尚不清楚,但最可能的危险因素是导管在神经周围或筋膜平面内插入的长度过长。我们目前使用的导管plexdragon 20g (Pajunk,德国)比我们使用过的其他导管(例如Portex 20g尼龙硬膜外导管(Smiths Medical,美国))要硬得多。这也可能导致打结的风险增加,因为当它们受到阻力(如筋膜平面)的推动时,它们更容易打结。扭结和打结的导管是罕见的并发症。随着连续外周神经和筋膜平面导管的应用越来越多,这是一个重要的问题,对难以收回的导管的管理知识是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perineural and fascial plane catheters- how to iron out the kinks
At our hospital, we have a growing regional anaesthesia service providing over 400 peripheral nerve or fascial plane catheters so far in 2017. We have recently had 2 episodes where rectus sheath catheters, which are our first line pain management for midline laparotomies, have become knotted whilst in situ and therefore been difficult to remove. One catheter required a small surgical incision (on the ward under local anaesthetic) to remove it, whilst the other was removed using artery forceps. Both were found to be knotted after removal from the patient (see picture). On both occasions the insertion of the catheter had not been documented. At out institution, most rectus sheath catheters are inserted by an anaesthetist using ultrasound, however some are placed at the end of the operation, by the surgeon under direct vision. It is well known that perineural and fascial plane catheters may kink and knot, however this is a rare phenomenon with an incidence of 0.13% [1]. Our recent problems have caused us to re-think our practice and highlight some key issues. Documentation of any procedure is essential. When the same procedure maybe carried out by 2 specialities documentation is potentially even more important. The surgeons at our institution often suture the rectus sheath catheters after insertion, whereas anaesthetists do not. This information is key when attempting to remove the catheter. We have changed our practice, so that any rectus sheath catheter (inserted by either surgeon or anaesthetist) will now be documented by the anaesthetist within the notes (although, obviously, it would be expected that the surgeons do document any procedure they perform). The decision for this was prompted by the fact that anaesthetists are the first port of call when a rectus sheath catheter is difficult to remove, and we needed a mechanism to improve access to information as to how the catheter had been secured. We routinely leave rectus sheath catheters in for 3-5 days. After this amount of time, we would expect that they may be easily removed with minimal resistance. If there is any difficulty in removing the catheter first line management should be to flush the catheter with 10 mls of 0.9% saline, to make space around the catheter and dislodge any fibrous tissue attached to the catheter. This may fail if the catheter is knotted as the catheter is often occluded. We would then advocate using artery forceps to grasp the most proximal exposed part of the catheter, allowing increased tension and better manipulation of the angle at which force is applied to the catheter. If this fails surgical exploration may be required, depending on how much catheter is left in the patient, this may be done in a ward based setting as opposed to a return to theatre. Fluoroscopy guided catheter removal has also been described [1]. We have now changed our practice with regards to how much catheter is left in situ. The optimal length of rectus sheath catheter insertion (or any fascial plane catheter) is unknown. Case reports of knotted perineural catheters imply that if more than 10cm of catheter is inserted it will increase the likelihood of kinking [2,3,4]. Our practice was to insert as much as possible, up to 15cm, however on reflection this probably increased the chance of knotting of the catheter. Our catheters have multiple orifices at the distal 3cm, and we now routinely only leave 5cm in situ; allowing adequate catheter for infusion of local anaesthetic, without excess catheters to kink and knot. Exact mechanisms that cause catheters to kink is unknown, but the most likely risk factor is a long length of catheter inserted either around the nerve or within a fascial plane. Our current catheters, PlexoLong 20g (Pajunk , Germany), are notably stiffer than others we have used, such as the Portex 20g Nylon epidural catheters (Smiths Medical, USA). This may also lead to an increased risk of knotting as they are more likely to kink when pushed up against resistance, such as a fascial plane. Kinked and knotted catheters are rare complications. With the increasing applications of continuous peripheral nerve and fascial plane catheters this is an important issue and knowledge of management of a difficult to retrieve catheter is essential.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信