OpenAI的Codex能修复bug吗?:对QuixBugs的评价

Julian Aron Prenner, Hlib Babii, R. Robbes
{"title":"OpenAI的Codex能修复bug吗?:对QuixBugs的评价","authors":"Julian Aron Prenner, Hlib Babii, R. Robbes","doi":"10.1145/3524459.3527351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OpenAI's Codex, a GPT-3like model trained on a large code corpus, has made headlines in and outside of academia. Given a short user-provided description, it is capable of synthesizing code snippets that are syntactically and semantically valid in most cases. In this work, we want to investigate whether Codex is able to localize and fix bugs, two important tasks in automated program repair. Our initial evaluation uses the multi-language QuixBugs benchmark (40 bugs in both Python and Java). We find that, despite not being trained for APR, Codex is surprisingly effective, and competitive with recent state of the art techniques. Our results also show that Codex is more successful at repairing Python than Java, fixing 50% more bugs in Python.","PeriodicalId":131481,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Automated Program Repair (APR)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can OpenAI's Codex Fix Bugs?: An evaluation on QuixBugs\",\"authors\":\"Julian Aron Prenner, Hlib Babii, R. Robbes\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3524459.3527351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OpenAI's Codex, a GPT-3like model trained on a large code corpus, has made headlines in and outside of academia. Given a short user-provided description, it is capable of synthesizing code snippets that are syntactically and semantically valid in most cases. In this work, we want to investigate whether Codex is able to localize and fix bugs, two important tasks in automated program repair. Our initial evaluation uses the multi-language QuixBugs benchmark (40 bugs in both Python and Java). We find that, despite not being trained for APR, Codex is surprisingly effective, and competitive with recent state of the art techniques. Our results also show that Codex is more successful at repairing Python than Java, fixing 50% more bugs in Python.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Automated Program Repair (APR)\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Automated Program Repair (APR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3524459.3527351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Automated Program Repair (APR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3524459.3527351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

摘要

OpenAI的Codex是一个在大型代码语料库上训练的类似gpt -3的模型,已经成为学术界内外的头条新闻。给定用户提供的简短描述,它能够合成在大多数情况下在语法和语义上都有效的代码片段。在这项工作中,我们想调查Codex是否能够定位和修复错误,这是自动程序修复中的两项重要任务。我们最初的评估使用了多语言的QuixBugs基准测试(Python和Java中都有40个bug)。我们发现,尽管没有接受过APR培训,但食品法典的有效性令人惊讶,与最新的技术相比具有竞争力。我们的结果还表明,Codex在修复Python方面比Java更成功,修复的Python错误多50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can OpenAI's Codex Fix Bugs?: An evaluation on QuixBugs
OpenAI's Codex, a GPT-3like model trained on a large code corpus, has made headlines in and outside of academia. Given a short user-provided description, it is capable of synthesizing code snippets that are syntactically and semantically valid in most cases. In this work, we want to investigate whether Codex is able to localize and fix bugs, two important tasks in automated program repair. Our initial evaluation uses the multi-language QuixBugs benchmark (40 bugs in both Python and Java). We find that, despite not being trained for APR, Codex is surprisingly effective, and competitive with recent state of the art techniques. Our results also show that Codex is more successful at repairing Python than Java, fixing 50% more bugs in Python.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信