职业消费异质性:了解新冠肺炎疫情期间职业对个人消费的影响

Christopher D. Cotton, Vaishali Garga, J. Rohan
{"title":"职业消费异质性:了解新冠肺炎疫情期间职业对个人消费的影响","authors":"Christopher D. Cotton, Vaishali Garga, J. Rohan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3720235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unemployment rates reached unprecedented levels during the COVID-19 pandemic. The nature of the virus transmission, and the policy interventions enacted in response, however, is such that certain \"high risk\" occupations suffered more than the \"low risk\" occupations. This paper exploits the variation in the unemployment rate of different occupations to analyze the response of (real-time) consumption spending to unemployment risk. We find that during the first five weeks of the pandemic, higher occupational unemployment risk did not result in lower relative spending. However, in later weeks as the pandemic proceeded, higher occupational unemployment risk resulted in lower relative spending. We attribute this change to the evolution of perceptions regarding unemployment risk, and the expiration of stimulus payments and expanded unemployment insurance benefits provided under the CARES Act. We also create an alternative metric, based on job characteristics, to predict the riskiness of different occupations. We find that high risk occupations were those that were unable to work from home, were required to work in close physical proximity to others, and were essential.","PeriodicalId":244949,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumption Heterogeneity by Occupation: Understanding the Impact of Occupation on Personal Consumption During the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Christopher D. Cotton, Vaishali Garga, J. Rohan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3720235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unemployment rates reached unprecedented levels during the COVID-19 pandemic. The nature of the virus transmission, and the policy interventions enacted in response, however, is such that certain \\\"high risk\\\" occupations suffered more than the \\\"low risk\\\" occupations. This paper exploits the variation in the unemployment rate of different occupations to analyze the response of (real-time) consumption spending to unemployment risk. We find that during the first five weeks of the pandemic, higher occupational unemployment risk did not result in lower relative spending. However, in later weeks as the pandemic proceeded, higher occupational unemployment risk resulted in lower relative spending. We attribute this change to the evolution of perceptions regarding unemployment risk, and the expiration of stimulus payments and expanded unemployment insurance benefits provided under the CARES Act. We also create an alternative metric, based on job characteristics, to predict the riskiness of different occupations. We find that high risk occupations were those that were unable to work from home, were required to work in close physical proximity to others, and were essential.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal\",\"volume\":\"157 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3720235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3720235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,失业率达到前所未有的水平。然而,从病毒传播的性质和为应对疫情而采取的政策干预来看,某些"高风险"职业比"低风险"职业受到的影响更大。本文利用不同职业失业率的变化来分析(实时)消费支出对失业风险的响应。我们发现,在大流行的前五周,较高的职业失业风险并未导致相对支出减少。然而,在大流行进行的后几周,较高的职业失业风险导致相对支出减少。我们将这一变化归因于对失业风险的看法的演变,以及《关怀法案》(CARES Act)规定的刺激支出和扩大失业保险福利的到期。我们还根据工作特征创建了另一种度量,来预测不同职业的风险。我们发现,高风险职业是那些不能在家工作、需要与他人近距离接触的职业,而且是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consumption Heterogeneity by Occupation: Understanding the Impact of Occupation on Personal Consumption During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Unemployment rates reached unprecedented levels during the COVID-19 pandemic. The nature of the virus transmission, and the policy interventions enacted in response, however, is such that certain "high risk" occupations suffered more than the "low risk" occupations. This paper exploits the variation in the unemployment rate of different occupations to analyze the response of (real-time) consumption spending to unemployment risk. We find that during the first five weeks of the pandemic, higher occupational unemployment risk did not result in lower relative spending. However, in later weeks as the pandemic proceeded, higher occupational unemployment risk resulted in lower relative spending. We attribute this change to the evolution of perceptions regarding unemployment risk, and the expiration of stimulus payments and expanded unemployment insurance benefits provided under the CARES Act. We also create an alternative metric, based on job characteristics, to predict the riskiness of different occupations. We find that high risk occupations were those that were unable to work from home, were required to work in close physical proximity to others, and were essential.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信