内部边境管制的相称性:从2019冠状病毒病大流行到2021年提案

Léa Schumacker
{"title":"内部边境管制的相称性:从2019冠状病毒病大流行到2021年提案","authors":"Léa Schumacker","doi":"10.3935/cyelp.18.2022.490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most Schengen Member States reintroduced internal border controls in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These controls, which in some instances lasted for several months, jeopardised the principle of an area without borders and had to comply with the principle of proportionality. This article examines four aspects of these controls related to proportionality: the type of threat invoked, the adequacy of the measures, the duration of the controls, and the scrutiny over proportionality. First, it demonstrates that the current Schengen Borders Code contains appropriate safeguards for each aspect. However, some Schengen Member States disregarded them during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Commission did not use its scrutiny powers. In December 2021, the Commission proposed to amend the Schengen Borders Code. This 2021 proposal adapts the rules to the Schengen Member States' practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Then, this article argues that this proposal improves the aspects of legal certainty and scrutiny but does not satisfactorily address the aspects of adequacy and duration of internal border controls. In addition, the article presents some recommendations to increase the proportionality of the controls that the Schengen Member States would reintroduce following the 2021 proposal.","PeriodicalId":137938,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proportionality of Internal Border Controls: From the Covid-19 Pandemic to the 2021 Proposal\",\"authors\":\"Léa Schumacker\",\"doi\":\"10.3935/cyelp.18.2022.490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most Schengen Member States reintroduced internal border controls in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These controls, which in some instances lasted for several months, jeopardised the principle of an area without borders and had to comply with the principle of proportionality. This article examines four aspects of these controls related to proportionality: the type of threat invoked, the adequacy of the measures, the duration of the controls, and the scrutiny over proportionality. First, it demonstrates that the current Schengen Borders Code contains appropriate safeguards for each aspect. However, some Schengen Member States disregarded them during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Commission did not use its scrutiny powers. In December 2021, the Commission proposed to amend the Schengen Borders Code. This 2021 proposal adapts the rules to the Schengen Member States' practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Then, this article argues that this proposal improves the aspects of legal certainty and scrutiny but does not satisfactorily address the aspects of adequacy and duration of internal border controls. In addition, the article presents some recommendations to increase the proportionality of the controls that the Schengen Member States would reintroduce following the 2021 proposal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.18.2022.490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.18.2022.490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为应对COVID-19大流行,大多数申根成员国重新实施了内部边境管制。这些管制在某些情况下持续了几个月,破坏了无边界地区的原则,必须遵守相称原则。本文考察了与相称性相关的这些控制的四个方面:所援引的威胁类型、措施的充分性、控制的持续时间以及对相称性的审查。首先,它表明目前的《申根边境法》对每个方面都有适当的保障措施。然而,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,一些申根成员国无视这些规定,欧盟委员会也没有使用其审查权力。2021年12月,欧盟委员会提议修订《申根边境法》。2021年的提案根据申根成员国在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的做法对规则进行了调整。然后,本文认为,这一建议改善了法律确定性和审查方面的问题,但没有令人满意地解决内部边界管制的充分性和持续时间方面的问题。此外,文章还提出了一些建议,以提高申根成员国将在2021年提案之后重新引入的管制的比例性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proportionality of Internal Border Controls: From the Covid-19 Pandemic to the 2021 Proposal
Most Schengen Member States reintroduced internal border controls in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These controls, which in some instances lasted for several months, jeopardised the principle of an area without borders and had to comply with the principle of proportionality. This article examines four aspects of these controls related to proportionality: the type of threat invoked, the adequacy of the measures, the duration of the controls, and the scrutiny over proportionality. First, it demonstrates that the current Schengen Borders Code contains appropriate safeguards for each aspect. However, some Schengen Member States disregarded them during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Commission did not use its scrutiny powers. In December 2021, the Commission proposed to amend the Schengen Borders Code. This 2021 proposal adapts the rules to the Schengen Member States' practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Then, this article argues that this proposal improves the aspects of legal certainty and scrutiny but does not satisfactorily address the aspects of adequacy and duration of internal border controls. In addition, the article presents some recommendations to increase the proportionality of the controls that the Schengen Member States would reintroduce following the 2021 proposal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信