{"title":"1918—1938年在上奥地利向残疾人提供公共服务","authors":"Angela Wegscheider","doi":"10.1553/virus11s115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This the the construction of disability and ableism in and in its the as the and taking of in the and in the Republic, the and Protestant were strongly involved in the task. Therefore, grace and mercy were the main guidelines and motives of care. Life in the institutions was marked by hierarchical and authoritarian paternalistic structures and subordination, big groups, excessive demands on staff, a lack of resources and adequate training.","PeriodicalId":343383,"journal":{"name":"VIRUS - Beiträge zur Sozialgeschichte der Medizin","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Die institutionelle Versorgung von Menschen mit Behinderungen in Oberösterreich 1918-1938\",\"authors\":\"Angela Wegscheider\",\"doi\":\"10.1553/virus11s115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This the the construction of disability and ableism in and in its the as the and taking of in the and in the Republic, the and Protestant were strongly involved in the task. Therefore, grace and mercy were the main guidelines and motives of care. Life in the institutions was marked by hierarchical and authoritarian paternalistic structures and subordination, big groups, excessive demands on staff, a lack of resources and adequate training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VIRUS - Beiträge zur Sozialgeschichte der Medizin\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VIRUS - Beiträge zur Sozialgeschichte der Medizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1553/virus11s115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VIRUS - Beiträge zur Sozialgeschichte der Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1553/virus11s115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Die institutionelle Versorgung von Menschen mit Behinderungen in Oberösterreich 1918-1938
This the the construction of disability and ableism in and in its the as the and taking of in the and in the Republic, the and Protestant were strongly involved in the task. Therefore, grace and mercy were the main guidelines and motives of care. Life in the institutions was marked by hierarchical and authoritarian paternalistic structures and subordination, big groups, excessive demands on staff, a lack of resources and adequate training.