{"title":"分布式控制实现中的问题","authors":"Umit Osguner","doi":"10.23919/ACC.1989.4790201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design of controllers for decentralised have been considered by many researchers who have assumed that implementation of these controllers would not provide any additional problems. In this paper a number of different implementation configurations are considered. It is shown that different closed-loop dynamics may result, based on sampling rates, connection topologies and communication traffic. An expanded state-space based transition matrix is advocated for further analysis of stability and optimality issues.","PeriodicalId":383719,"journal":{"name":"1989 American Control Conference","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problems in Implementing Distributed Control\",\"authors\":\"Umit Osguner\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/ACC.1989.4790201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Design of controllers for decentralised have been considered by many researchers who have assumed that implementation of these controllers would not provide any additional problems. In this paper a number of different implementation configurations are considered. It is shown that different closed-loop dynamics may result, based on sampling rates, connection topologies and communication traffic. An expanded state-space based transition matrix is advocated for further analysis of stability and optimality issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1989 American Control Conference\",\"volume\":\"155 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1989 American Control Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.1989.4790201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1989 American Control Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.1989.4790201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Design of controllers for decentralised have been considered by many researchers who have assumed that implementation of these controllers would not provide any additional problems. In this paper a number of different implementation configurations are considered. It is shown that different closed-loop dynamics may result, based on sampling rates, connection topologies and communication traffic. An expanded state-space based transition matrix is advocated for further analysis of stability and optimality issues.