土壤与种子系统施药防治圣华金河谷甜菜卷顶病毒的比较

S. Kaffka, W. Wintermantel, R. Lewellen
{"title":"土壤与种子系统施药防治圣华金河谷甜菜卷顶病毒的比较","authors":"S. Kaffka, W. Wintermantel, R. Lewellen","doi":"10.5274/JSBR.39.3.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beet curly top virus (BCTV), a gemini virus, remains a problem for farmers in the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) of California. It is spread by the beet leaf hopper (Circulifer tene/lus Baker), which has become naturalized in the state. Recent dependence on sugarbeet cultivars without BCTV resistance has led to increased concern about the potential for a BCTV epidemic. Two trials were carried out in successive years in the western SJV to test the effects of alternative protective insecticides for control of BCTV on susceptible and resistant sugarbeet cultivars. Two rates ofimidicloprid applied as a seed treatment (45 g and 90 g a.i. per 100,000 seeds) were compared to the current standard treatment of phorate applied to soil at 83.8 g a. i. per 1000 m of row, and an untreated control. Natural BCTV infection occurred in both years, but the second trial took place during a major beet leafhopper population increase and infection occurred much earlier in crop development. Sugarbeet root and sugar yields declined linearly with increasing rates of infection (r2 = 0.856). Yields declined because roots were significantly smaller with the non-tolerant cultivar. Sugar percentage was unaffected by insecticide treatments, but differed by cultivar. Imidicloprid and phorate provided similar levels ofprotection to plants, but were not able to prevent large yield losses among susceptible cultivars. Plant resistance provided more protection than systemic","PeriodicalId":403165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparisons of Soil and Seed Applied Systemic Insecticides to Control Beet Curly Top Virus in the San Joaquin Valley\",\"authors\":\"S. Kaffka, W. Wintermantel, R. Lewellen\",\"doi\":\"10.5274/JSBR.39.3.59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Beet curly top virus (BCTV), a gemini virus, remains a problem for farmers in the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) of California. It is spread by the beet leaf hopper (Circulifer tene/lus Baker), which has become naturalized in the state. Recent dependence on sugarbeet cultivars without BCTV resistance has led to increased concern about the potential for a BCTV epidemic. Two trials were carried out in successive years in the western SJV to test the effects of alternative protective insecticides for control of BCTV on susceptible and resistant sugarbeet cultivars. Two rates ofimidicloprid applied as a seed treatment (45 g and 90 g a.i. per 100,000 seeds) were compared to the current standard treatment of phorate applied to soil at 83.8 g a. i. per 1000 m of row, and an untreated control. Natural BCTV infection occurred in both years, but the second trial took place during a major beet leafhopper population increase and infection occurred much earlier in crop development. Sugarbeet root and sugar yields declined linearly with increasing rates of infection (r2 = 0.856). Yields declined because roots were significantly smaller with the non-tolerant cultivar. Sugar percentage was unaffected by insecticide treatments, but differed by cultivar. Imidicloprid and phorate provided similar levels ofprotection to plants, but were not able to prevent large yield losses among susceptible cultivars. Plant resistance provided more protection than systemic\",\"PeriodicalId\":403165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sugarbeet Research\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sugarbeet Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5274/JSBR.39.3.59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5274/JSBR.39.3.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

甜菜卷顶病毒(BCTV)是一种双子病毒,对加州圣华金河谷(SJV)的农民来说仍然是一个问题。它是由甜菜叶蝉(cirlifer tene/lus Baker)传播的,它已经在该州归化了。最近对无BCTV抗性的甜菜品种的依赖使人们越来越担心BCTV流行的可能性。在西部地区连续两年进行了两项试验,以测试防治BCTV的替代保护性杀虫剂对敏感和抗性甜菜品种的效果。将两种剂量的吡虫啉作为种子处理(每10万粒种子每年施用45克和90克),与目前标准的每1000米行施用83.8克磷的土壤处理和未经处理的对照进行了比较。这两年都发生了BCTV自然侵染,但第二次试验发生在甜菜叶蝉种群大量增加的时期,侵染发生在作物发育的早期。甜菜根和糖产量随侵染率的增加呈线性下降(r2 = 0.856)。产量下降是因为不耐药品种的根明显较小。含糖量不受杀虫剂处理的影响,但因品种而异。吡虫啉和磷酸酯对植物提供了类似水平的保护,但不能防止易感品种的大量产量损失。植物抗性提供了比系统抗性更多的保护
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparisons of Soil and Seed Applied Systemic Insecticides to Control Beet Curly Top Virus in the San Joaquin Valley
Beet curly top virus (BCTV), a gemini virus, remains a problem for farmers in the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) of California. It is spread by the beet leaf hopper (Circulifer tene/lus Baker), which has become naturalized in the state. Recent dependence on sugarbeet cultivars without BCTV resistance has led to increased concern about the potential for a BCTV epidemic. Two trials were carried out in successive years in the western SJV to test the effects of alternative protective insecticides for control of BCTV on susceptible and resistant sugarbeet cultivars. Two rates ofimidicloprid applied as a seed treatment (45 g and 90 g a.i. per 100,000 seeds) were compared to the current standard treatment of phorate applied to soil at 83.8 g a. i. per 1000 m of row, and an untreated control. Natural BCTV infection occurred in both years, but the second trial took place during a major beet leafhopper population increase and infection occurred much earlier in crop development. Sugarbeet root and sugar yields declined linearly with increasing rates of infection (r2 = 0.856). Yields declined because roots were significantly smaller with the non-tolerant cultivar. Sugar percentage was unaffected by insecticide treatments, but differed by cultivar. Imidicloprid and phorate provided similar levels ofprotection to plants, but were not able to prevent large yield losses among susceptible cultivars. Plant resistance provided more protection than systemic
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信