死亡的坏处和应对之道(如果有的话)

F. Kamm
{"title":"死亡的坏处和应对之道(如果有的话)","authors":"F. Kamm","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190921415.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 1 discusses the pros and cons of four views about the badness of death on the assumption that it involves one’s ceasing to exist: Deprivationism, Willlhavehadism, Alloverism, and Insultism. It considers how these views bear on such questions as whether death is always bad for the person who dies, whose life to save when not all can be saved, how the distribution of goods and bads in a life matters, and whether it is reasonable to have an asymmetrical attitude toward death and prenatal nonexistence. The chapter also considers what the four views imply about the badness of the extinction of humanity (and all other persons).","PeriodicalId":387879,"journal":{"name":"Almost Over","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Badness of Death and What to Do About It (if Anything)\",\"authors\":\"F. Kamm\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780190921415.003.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter 1 discusses the pros and cons of four views about the badness of death on the assumption that it involves one’s ceasing to exist: Deprivationism, Willlhavehadism, Alloverism, and Insultism. It considers how these views bear on such questions as whether death is always bad for the person who dies, whose life to save when not all can be saved, how the distribution of goods and bads in a life matters, and whether it is reasonable to have an asymmetrical attitude toward death and prenatal nonexistence. The chapter also considers what the four views imply about the badness of the extinction of humanity (and all other persons).\",\"PeriodicalId\":387879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Almost Over\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Almost Over\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190921415.003.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Almost Over","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190921415.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

第一章讨论了关于死亡的坏处的四种观点的利弊,假设它涉及到一个人的停止存在:剥夺主义,willhahadism, Alloverism和Insultism。它考虑了这些观点如何影响诸如死亡对死者是否总是坏事,在不是所有人都能得救的情况下拯救谁的生命,生命中善与恶的分配如何重要,以及对死亡和产前不存在持不对称态度是否合理。本章还考虑了这四种观点对人类(和所有其他人)灭绝的坏处的暗示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Badness of Death and What to Do About It (if Anything)
Chapter 1 discusses the pros and cons of four views about the badness of death on the assumption that it involves one’s ceasing to exist: Deprivationism, Willlhavehadism, Alloverism, and Insultism. It considers how these views bear on such questions as whether death is always bad for the person who dies, whose life to save when not all can be saved, how the distribution of goods and bads in a life matters, and whether it is reasonable to have an asymmetrical attitude toward death and prenatal nonexistence. The chapter also considers what the four views imply about the badness of the extinction of humanity (and all other persons).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信