具体问题模型变换的系统映射研究

Edouard R. Batot, H. Sahraoui, Eugene Syriani, Paul Molins, Wael Sboui
{"title":"具体问题模型变换的系统映射研究","authors":"Edouard R. Batot, H. Sahraoui, Eugene Syriani, Paul Molins, Wael Sboui","doi":"10.5220/0005657301760183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a contribution to the adoption of the Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) paradigm, the research community has proposed concrete model transformation solutions for the MDE infrastructure and for domain-specific problems. However, as the adoption increases and with the advent of the new initiatives for the creation of repositories, it is legitimate to question whether proposals for concrete transformation problems can be still considered as research contributions or if they respond to a practical/technical work. In this paper, we report on a systematic mapping study that aims at understanding the trends and characteristics of concrete model transformations published in the past decade. Our study shows that the number of papers with, as main contribution, a concrete transformation solution, is not as high as expected. This number increased to reach a peak in 2010 and is decreasing since then. Our results also include a characterization and an analysis of the published proposals following a rigorous classification scheme.","PeriodicalId":360028,"journal":{"name":"2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic mapping study of model transformations for concrete problems\",\"authors\":\"Edouard R. Batot, H. Sahraoui, Eugene Syriani, Paul Molins, Wael Sboui\",\"doi\":\"10.5220/0005657301760183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a contribution to the adoption of the Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) paradigm, the research community has proposed concrete model transformation solutions for the MDE infrastructure and for domain-specific problems. However, as the adoption increases and with the advent of the new initiatives for the creation of repositories, it is legitimate to question whether proposals for concrete transformation problems can be still considered as research contributions or if they respond to a practical/technical work. In this paper, we report on a systematic mapping study that aims at understanding the trends and characteristics of concrete model transformations published in the past decade. Our study shows that the number of papers with, as main contribution, a concrete transformation solution, is not as high as expected. This number increased to reach a peak in 2010 and is decreasing since then. Our results also include a characterization and an analysis of the published proposals following a rigorous classification scheme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)\",\"volume\":\"155 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005657301760183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005657301760183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

作为对模型驱动工程(MDE)范例采用的贡献,研究团体已经为MDE基础设施和特定领域的问题提出了具体的模型转换解决方案。然而,随着采用的增加以及创建存储库的新计划的出现,对于具体转换问题的建议是否仍然可以被视为研究贡献,或者它们是否响应实际/技术工作,这是合理的质疑。在本文中,我们报告了一项系统的制图研究,旨在了解过去十年中发表的具体模型转换的趋势和特征。我们的研究表明,以具体转化方案为主要贡献的论文数量并没有预期的那么多。这一数字在2010年达到顶峰,此后一直在下降。我们的结果还包括在严格的分类方案下对已发表的提案进行表征和分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic mapping study of model transformations for concrete problems
As a contribution to the adoption of the Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) paradigm, the research community has proposed concrete model transformation solutions for the MDE infrastructure and for domain-specific problems. However, as the adoption increases and with the advent of the new initiatives for the creation of repositories, it is legitimate to question whether proposals for concrete transformation problems can be still considered as research contributions or if they respond to a practical/technical work. In this paper, we report on a systematic mapping study that aims at understanding the trends and characteristics of concrete model transformations published in the past decade. Our study shows that the number of papers with, as main contribution, a concrete transformation solution, is not as high as expected. This number increased to reach a peak in 2010 and is decreasing since then. Our results also include a characterization and an analysis of the published proposals following a rigorous classification scheme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信