{"title":"自由与制度:赫内斯的《自由论》中作为黑格尔“sittlichkeitslehre”的正义理论","authors":"Taiju Okochi","doi":"10.15057/23189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The normative reconstruction of our modern society that A. Honneth adopts as a method for the theory of justice in his Das Recht der Freiheit (2011) follows on from his interpretation of Hegelʼs Philosophy of Right in his earlier book Das Leiden an Unbestimmtheit (2001). In this paper, it is argued that Honnethʼs theoretical development here is the necessary result of his theory of recognition, but that it also implies some theoretical problems. These are as follows: (1) the circularity problem; (2) the gerrymandering problem; and (3) the implicit shift of the grounds of normativity. The last problem in particular implies an important theoretical turn from his formal position that could upset his program of the revision of Critical Theory through the theory of recognition.","PeriodicalId":335834,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of social studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FREEDOM AND INSTITUTION: THEORY OF JUSTICE AS HEGELIAN \\\"SITTLICHKEITSLEHRE\\\" IN A. HONNETH'S DAS RECHT DER FREIHEIT\",\"authors\":\"Taiju Okochi\",\"doi\":\"10.15057/23189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The normative reconstruction of our modern society that A. Honneth adopts as a method for the theory of justice in his Das Recht der Freiheit (2011) follows on from his interpretation of Hegelʼs Philosophy of Right in his earlier book Das Leiden an Unbestimmtheit (2001). In this paper, it is argued that Honnethʼs theoretical development here is the necessary result of his theory of recognition, but that it also implies some theoretical problems. These are as follows: (1) the circularity problem; (2) the gerrymandering problem; and (3) the implicit shift of the grounds of normativity. The last problem in particular implies an important theoretical turn from his formal position that could upset his program of the revision of Critical Theory through the theory of recognition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hitotsubashi journal of social studies\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hitotsubashi journal of social studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15057/23189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of social studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/23189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
a . Honneth在其《自由论》(2011)中作为正义理论的一种方法,采用了对我们现代社会的规范重建,这是他在其早期著作《自由论》(2001)中对黑格尔法哲学的解释的延续。本文认为,霍内斯在这方面的理论发展是他的认识理论的必然结果,但也隐含着一些理论问题。这些问题如下:(1)圆度问题;(2)不公正划分选区问题;(3)规范性基础的隐性转移。特别是最后一个问题暗示了他正式立场的一个重要的理论转向,这可能会打乱他通过承认理论修正批判理论的计划。
FREEDOM AND INSTITUTION: THEORY OF JUSTICE AS HEGELIAN "SITTLICHKEITSLEHRE" IN A. HONNETH'S DAS RECHT DER FREIHEIT
The normative reconstruction of our modern society that A. Honneth adopts as a method for the theory of justice in his Das Recht der Freiheit (2011) follows on from his interpretation of Hegelʼs Philosophy of Right in his earlier book Das Leiden an Unbestimmtheit (2001). In this paper, it is argued that Honnethʼs theoretical development here is the necessary result of his theory of recognition, but that it also implies some theoretical problems. These are as follows: (1) the circularity problem; (2) the gerrymandering problem; and (3) the implicit shift of the grounds of normativity. The last problem in particular implies an important theoretical turn from his formal position that could upset his program of the revision of Critical Theory through the theory of recognition.