{"title":"实践中的成本效益分析","authors":"N. Mouter","doi":"10.4233/UUID:57DDEF96-3232-411B-A184-6C2AA4A4CFEB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most western countries Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is used to inform decision makers about positive and negative effects for society of transport policy options. However, the way CBA is perceived by different key individuals that use, carry out or study CBAs has received scant attention in the literature. This thesis aims to fill four knowledge gaps at the interface of CBA and practice.","PeriodicalId":196352,"journal":{"name":"Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-benefit analysis in practice\",\"authors\":\"N. Mouter\",\"doi\":\"10.4233/UUID:57DDEF96-3232-411B-A184-6C2AA4A4CFEB\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In most western countries Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is used to inform decision makers about positive and negative effects for society of transport policy options. However, the way CBA is perceived by different key individuals that use, carry out or study CBAs has received scant attention in the literature. This thesis aims to fill four knowledge gaps at the interface of CBA and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4233/UUID:57DDEF96-3232-411B-A184-6C2AA4A4CFEB\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4233/UUID:57DDEF96-3232-411B-A184-6C2AA4A4CFEB","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In most western countries Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is used to inform decision makers about positive and negative effects for society of transport policy options. However, the way CBA is perceived by different key individuals that use, carry out or study CBAs has received scant attention in the literature. This thesis aims to fill four knowledge gaps at the interface of CBA and practice.