{"title":"George Gauge™配位法与发声音素配位法在OSA口腔辅助器具构建中的回顾性比较","authors":"John Viviano, D. Klauer, S. Olmos, J. Viviano","doi":"10.1080/08869634.2019.1694776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: To compare outcomes for appliances manufactured utilizing the George Gauge™ Registration (GGR) and the Sibilant Phoneme Registration (SPR). It was hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcomes. Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of two groups. Each group consisted of 20 oral appliances manufactured utilizing the GGR and 20 utilizing the SPR. Results: For the two-site data, no difference in outcomes was demonstrated (p = .24). The SPR method required fewer calibrations (p = 5.6 × 10−3) and less jaw movement (p = 3.33 × 10−4). Both bite methods resulted in similarly variable post-AHI scores (p = .52). For the eight-site data, no difference in outcomes was demonstrated (p = .76). The SPR required less movement of the jaw (p = 4.52 × 10−5); however, outcome variance was larger for the SPR (p = .036). Conclusion: The study null hypothesis of no difference in outcomes was supported. Abbreviations: AHI: Apnea-Hypopnea Index; GGR: George Gauge Registration; SPR: Sibilant Phoneme Registration; OSA: Obstructive Sleep Apnea; OA: Oral Appliance; OAT: Oral Appliance Therapy; MA: Mandibular Advancement; VDO: Vertical Dimensional Opening; AADSM: American Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine; ABDSM: American Board of Dental Sleep Medicine; BMI: Body Mass Index","PeriodicalId":162405,"journal":{"name":"CRANIO®","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective comparison of the George Gauge™ registration and the sibilant phoneme registration for constructing OSA oral appliances\",\"authors\":\"John Viviano, D. Klauer, S. Olmos, J. Viviano\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08869634.2019.1694776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective: To compare outcomes for appliances manufactured utilizing the George Gauge™ Registration (GGR) and the Sibilant Phoneme Registration (SPR). It was hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcomes. Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of two groups. Each group consisted of 20 oral appliances manufactured utilizing the GGR and 20 utilizing the SPR. Results: For the two-site data, no difference in outcomes was demonstrated (p = .24). The SPR method required fewer calibrations (p = 5.6 × 10−3) and less jaw movement (p = 3.33 × 10−4). Both bite methods resulted in similarly variable post-AHI scores (p = .52). For the eight-site data, no difference in outcomes was demonstrated (p = .76). The SPR required less movement of the jaw (p = 4.52 × 10−5); however, outcome variance was larger for the SPR (p = .036). Conclusion: The study null hypothesis of no difference in outcomes was supported. Abbreviations: AHI: Apnea-Hypopnea Index; GGR: George Gauge Registration; SPR: Sibilant Phoneme Registration; OSA: Obstructive Sleep Apnea; OA: Oral Appliance; OAT: Oral Appliance Therapy; MA: Mandibular Advancement; VDO: Vertical Dimensional Opening; AADSM: American Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine; ABDSM: American Board of Dental Sleep Medicine; BMI: Body Mass Index\",\"PeriodicalId\":162405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CRANIO®\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CRANIO®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2019.1694776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRANIO®","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2019.1694776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Retrospective comparison of the George Gauge™ registration and the sibilant phoneme registration for constructing OSA oral appliances
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare outcomes for appliances manufactured utilizing the George Gauge™ Registration (GGR) and the Sibilant Phoneme Registration (SPR). It was hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcomes. Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of two groups. Each group consisted of 20 oral appliances manufactured utilizing the GGR and 20 utilizing the SPR. Results: For the two-site data, no difference in outcomes was demonstrated (p = .24). The SPR method required fewer calibrations (p = 5.6 × 10−3) and less jaw movement (p = 3.33 × 10−4). Both bite methods resulted in similarly variable post-AHI scores (p = .52). For the eight-site data, no difference in outcomes was demonstrated (p = .76). The SPR required less movement of the jaw (p = 4.52 × 10−5); however, outcome variance was larger for the SPR (p = .036). Conclusion: The study null hypothesis of no difference in outcomes was supported. Abbreviations: AHI: Apnea-Hypopnea Index; GGR: George Gauge Registration; SPR: Sibilant Phoneme Registration; OSA: Obstructive Sleep Apnea; OA: Oral Appliance; OAT: Oral Appliance Therapy; MA: Mandibular Advancement; VDO: Vertical Dimensional Opening; AADSM: American Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine; ABDSM: American Board of Dental Sleep Medicine; BMI: Body Mass Index