{"title":"风和重力迫使滴剥落","authors":"E. White, Jason A. Schmucker","doi":"10.1103/PHYSREVFLUIDS.6.023601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Liquid drops adhere to solid surfaces due to surface tension but can depin and run back along the surface due to wind or gravity forcing. This work develops a simple mechanistic model for depinning by combined gravity and high-Reynolds-number wind forcing and tests that model using water drops on a roughened aluminum surface. On non-inclined surfaces, drops depin at a constant critical Weber number, $W\\!e_{\\mathrm{crit}}=7.9$, for the present wettability conditions. On inclined surfaces, $W\\!e_{\\mathrm{crit}}$ decreases linearly with the product of the Bond number and the width-to-height aspect ratio of the unforced drop. The linear slope is different in distinct wind- and gravity-dominated forcing regimes above and below $W\\!e_{\\mathrm{crit}}=4$. Contact line shapes and drop profile shapes are measured at depinning conditions but do not adequately explain the differences between the two forcing regimes.","PeriodicalId":328276,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Fluid Dynamics","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wind- and gravity-forced drop depinning\",\"authors\":\"E. White, Jason A. Schmucker\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/PHYSREVFLUIDS.6.023601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Liquid drops adhere to solid surfaces due to surface tension but can depin and run back along the surface due to wind or gravity forcing. This work develops a simple mechanistic model for depinning by combined gravity and high-Reynolds-number wind forcing and tests that model using water drops on a roughened aluminum surface. On non-inclined surfaces, drops depin at a constant critical Weber number, $W\\\\!e_{\\\\mathrm{crit}}=7.9$, for the present wettability conditions. On inclined surfaces, $W\\\\!e_{\\\\mathrm{crit}}$ decreases linearly with the product of the Bond number and the width-to-height aspect ratio of the unforced drop. The linear slope is different in distinct wind- and gravity-dominated forcing regimes above and below $W\\\\!e_{\\\\mathrm{crit}}=4$. Contact line shapes and drop profile shapes are measured at depinning conditions but do not adequately explain the differences between the two forcing regimes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Fluid Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Fluid Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVFLUIDS.6.023601\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Fluid Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVFLUIDS.6.023601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Liquid drops adhere to solid surfaces due to surface tension but can depin and run back along the surface due to wind or gravity forcing. This work develops a simple mechanistic model for depinning by combined gravity and high-Reynolds-number wind forcing and tests that model using water drops on a roughened aluminum surface. On non-inclined surfaces, drops depin at a constant critical Weber number, $W\!e_{\mathrm{crit}}=7.9$, for the present wettability conditions. On inclined surfaces, $W\!e_{\mathrm{crit}}$ decreases linearly with the product of the Bond number and the width-to-height aspect ratio of the unforced drop. The linear slope is different in distinct wind- and gravity-dominated forcing regimes above and below $W\!e_{\mathrm{crit}}=4$. Contact line shapes and drop profile shapes are measured at depinning conditions but do not adequately explain the differences between the two forcing regimes.