市场结构事宜

Charles Polk, E. Schulman
{"title":"市场结构事宜","authors":"Charles Polk, E. Schulman","doi":"10.3905/jot.2018.13.4.082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Richard Roll observed that continuous markets are more volatile than other market structures. If it is true that continuous markets induce volatility, then unless we change that market structure, we will continue to be plagued with sporadic bursts of nonfunctional, uninformative volatility. This article looks to the underlying reasons and suggests a more serviceable market structure.","PeriodicalId":254660,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trading","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market Structure Matters\",\"authors\":\"Charles Polk, E. Schulman\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jot.2018.13.4.082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Richard Roll observed that continuous markets are more volatile than other market structures. If it is true that continuous markets induce volatility, then unless we change that market structure, we will continue to be plagued with sporadic bursts of nonfunctional, uninformative volatility. This article looks to the underlying reasons and suggests a more serviceable market structure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Trading\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Trading\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jot.2018.13.4.082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trading","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jot.2018.13.4.082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理查德·罗尔观察到,连续市场比其他市场结构更不稳定。如果连续的市场确实会引发波动,那么除非我们改变这种市场结构,否则我们将继续受到零星爆发的无功能、无信息波动的困扰。本文着眼于潜在的原因,并提出了一个更适用的市场结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Market Structure Matters
Richard Roll observed that continuous markets are more volatile than other market structures. If it is true that continuous markets induce volatility, then unless we change that market structure, we will continue to be plagued with sporadic bursts of nonfunctional, uninformative volatility. This article looks to the underlying reasons and suggests a more serviceable market structure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信