进入的价格效应

Ki-Eun Rhee
{"title":"进入的价格效应","authors":"Ki-Eun Rhee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.982989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional oligopoly theories of markets where products are differentiated predict that entry of new firm enhances competition and thereby brings down the equilibrium market price. These theoretical predictions are, however, often challenged by contrasting empirical evidence suggesting that price increases with actual entries (Perloff, Suslow, Sequin ('96); Thomadsen ('05)). We provide a theoretical model in support of such empirical evidence by incorporating switching costs. Intuitively, if consumers have to incur costs when they switch products, a monopolist facing potential entry has incentives to price below the monopoly level and expand its consumer base pre-entry. By doing so, the incumbent firm can take full advantage of the lock-in effect post-entry by charging higher prices only to those consumers facing switching costs instead of directly competing with the entrant.","PeriodicalId":169574,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Price Effects of Entries\",\"authors\":\"Ki-Eun Rhee\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.982989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditional oligopoly theories of markets where products are differentiated predict that entry of new firm enhances competition and thereby brings down the equilibrium market price. These theoretical predictions are, however, often challenged by contrasting empirical evidence suggesting that price increases with actual entries (Perloff, Suslow, Sequin ('96); Thomadsen ('05)). We provide a theoretical model in support of such empirical evidence by incorporating switching costs. Intuitively, if consumers have to incur costs when they switch products, a monopolist facing potential entry has incentives to price below the monopoly level and expand its consumer base pre-entry. By doing so, the incumbent firm can take full advantage of the lock-in effect post-entry by charging higher prices only to those consumers facing switching costs instead of directly competing with the entrant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.982989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.982989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

产品差异化市场的传统寡头垄断理论预测,新企业的进入会加剧竞争,从而降低均衡市场价格。然而,这些理论预测经常受到对比经验证据的挑战,这些证据表明,价格随着实际进入而上涨(Perloff, Suslow, Sequin (1996);Thomadsen(05))。我们通过纳入转换成本提供了一个理论模型来支持这些经验证据。直觉上,如果消费者在更换产品时必须产生成本,面对潜在进入的垄断者有动机将价格定在垄断水平以下,并在进入前扩大其消费者基础。通过这样做,在位企业可以充分利用进入后的锁定效应,只向那些面临转换成本的消费者收取更高的价格,而不是直接与进入者竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Price Effects of Entries
Traditional oligopoly theories of markets where products are differentiated predict that entry of new firm enhances competition and thereby brings down the equilibrium market price. These theoretical predictions are, however, often challenged by contrasting empirical evidence suggesting that price increases with actual entries (Perloff, Suslow, Sequin ('96); Thomadsen ('05)). We provide a theoretical model in support of such empirical evidence by incorporating switching costs. Intuitively, if consumers have to incur costs when they switch products, a monopolist facing potential entry has incentives to price below the monopoly level and expand its consumer base pre-entry. By doing so, the incumbent firm can take full advantage of the lock-in effect post-entry by charging higher prices only to those consumers facing switching costs instead of directly competing with the entrant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信