{"title":"稀疏有向图中循环查找的下界","authors":"Xi Chen, T. Randolph, R. Servedio, Timothy Sun","doi":"10.1145/3417979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the problem of finding a cycle in a sparse directed graph G that is promised to be far from acyclic, meaning that the smallest feedback arc set, i.e., a subset of edges whose deletion results in an acyclic graph, in G is large. We prove an information-theoretic lower bound, showing that for N-vertex graphs with constant outdegree, any algorithm for this problem must make Ω̄(N5/9) queries to an adjacency list representation of G. In the language of property testing, our result is an Ω̄(N5/9) lower bound on the query complexity of one-sided algorithms for testing whether sparse digraphs with constant outdegree are far from acyclic. This is the first improvement on the Ω (√ N) lower bound, implicit in the work of Bender and Ron, which follows from a simple birthday paradox argument.","PeriodicalId":154047,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Lower Bound on Cycle-Finding in Sparse Digraphs\",\"authors\":\"Xi Chen, T. Randolph, R. Servedio, Timothy Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3417979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider the problem of finding a cycle in a sparse directed graph G that is promised to be far from acyclic, meaning that the smallest feedback arc set, i.e., a subset of edges whose deletion results in an acyclic graph, in G is large. We prove an information-theoretic lower bound, showing that for N-vertex graphs with constant outdegree, any algorithm for this problem must make Ω̄(N5/9) queries to an adjacency list representation of G. In the language of property testing, our result is an Ω̄(N5/9) lower bound on the query complexity of one-sided algorithms for testing whether sparse digraphs with constant outdegree are far from acyclic. This is the first improvement on the Ω (√ N) lower bound, implicit in the work of Bender and Ron, which follows from a simple birthday paradox argument.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3417979\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3417979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We consider the problem of finding a cycle in a sparse directed graph G that is promised to be far from acyclic, meaning that the smallest feedback arc set, i.e., a subset of edges whose deletion results in an acyclic graph, in G is large. We prove an information-theoretic lower bound, showing that for N-vertex graphs with constant outdegree, any algorithm for this problem must make Ω̄(N5/9) queries to an adjacency list representation of G. In the language of property testing, our result is an Ω̄(N5/9) lower bound on the query complexity of one-sided algorithms for testing whether sparse digraphs with constant outdegree are far from acyclic. This is the first improvement on the Ω (√ N) lower bound, implicit in the work of Bender and Ron, which follows from a simple birthday paradox argument.