{"title":"出血性败血症微生物之间的相关性","authors":"D. Niimi","doi":"10.1292/JVMS1922.3.297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of investigations with regard to correlations usually assumed to exist between hemorrhagic septicemia organisms has hitherto been published, but it is at present yet impossible to differenciate them with distinction, as the results obtained by those who have worked with the organisms are not in agreement.Employing B. bubalisepticus, B. suisepticus, B. avisepticus and B. bovisepticus I have made some experiments in connection with these problems and came to the following conclusions:1. Morphology, growth on ordinary culture media, indol production, hemolytic property, bacteriolysis in bile, fermentation test etc. showed no satisfactory evidence as to their identification.2. No distinction could be obtained from their pathogenicity for mice, rats, guinea-pigs, rabbits and pigeons inoculated or fed with the organisms and also from the postmortem appearances of the experimental animals.3. Cross agglutination test employing an immune serum obtained from the rabbit inoculated with dead organisms showed that the correlation between the organisms is highly complicated and no specificity could be distinguished in any of them. Agglutinin absorption test gave likewise no satisfactory results, although when employed an immune serum from the guinea-pig inoculated with living organisms the occurence of group reactions was less remarkable and consequently in a certain organisms specificity could be distinguished. Complement fixation test with those sera showed there are so many group reactions that no specificity could be found in any of the organisms. If, however, the complement fixation titres were taken into consideration the organisms could be specified in more or less noticeable degree, but not satisfactory enough for the identfication of them.4. Active and passive animal protection tests with mice showed in no case so markedly a specificity as to enable us to identify the organisms.Briefly speaking, it may be assumed that some of hemorrha- gic septicemia organisms may have their specificity, but it is quite impossible to differenciate them by virtue of the specificity which is generally so undistinguished.","PeriodicalId":101505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Japanese Society of Veterinary Science","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1924-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CORRELATIONS BETWEEN HEMORRHAGIC SEPTICEMIA ORGANISMS\",\"authors\":\"D. Niimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1292/JVMS1922.3.297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A number of investigations with regard to correlations usually assumed to exist between hemorrhagic septicemia organisms has hitherto been published, but it is at present yet impossible to differenciate them with distinction, as the results obtained by those who have worked with the organisms are not in agreement.Employing B. bubalisepticus, B. suisepticus, B. avisepticus and B. bovisepticus I have made some experiments in connection with these problems and came to the following conclusions:1. Morphology, growth on ordinary culture media, indol production, hemolytic property, bacteriolysis in bile, fermentation test etc. showed no satisfactory evidence as to their identification.2. No distinction could be obtained from their pathogenicity for mice, rats, guinea-pigs, rabbits and pigeons inoculated or fed with the organisms and also from the postmortem appearances of the experimental animals.3. Cross agglutination test employing an immune serum obtained from the rabbit inoculated with dead organisms showed that the correlation between the organisms is highly complicated and no specificity could be distinguished in any of them. Agglutinin absorption test gave likewise no satisfactory results, although when employed an immune serum from the guinea-pig inoculated with living organisms the occurence of group reactions was less remarkable and consequently in a certain organisms specificity could be distinguished. Complement fixation test with those sera showed there are so many group reactions that no specificity could be found in any of the organisms. If, however, the complement fixation titres were taken into consideration the organisms could be specified in more or less noticeable degree, but not satisfactory enough for the identfication of them.4. Active and passive animal protection tests with mice showed in no case so markedly a specificity as to enable us to identify the organisms.Briefly speaking, it may be assumed that some of hemorrha- gic septicemia organisms may have their specificity, but it is quite impossible to differenciate them by virtue of the specificity which is generally so undistinguished.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Japanese Society of Veterinary Science\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1924-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Japanese Society of Veterinary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1292/JVMS1922.3.297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Japanese Society of Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1292/JVMS1922.3.297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
迄今为止,已经发表了一些关于通常被认为存在于出血性败血症有机体之间的相关性的研究,但目前还不可能区分它们,因为那些与有机体一起工作的人获得的结果并不一致。我利用bubalisepticus, B. suisepticus, B. avisepticus和B. bovisepticus就这些问题做了一些实验,得出以下结论:形态学、在普通培养基上的生长、吲哚的产生、溶血性能、胆汁中的细菌溶解、发酵试验等对其鉴定都没有令人满意的证据。对接种或喂食这些微生物的小鼠、大鼠、豚鼠、兔子和鸽子的致病性,以及实验动物的死后外观,都没有区别。用接种过死菌的兔免疫血清进行交叉凝集试验,结果表明,死菌之间的相关性非常复杂,没有特异性。凝集素吸收试验同样没有令人满意的结果,尽管当使用接种了活生物体的豚鼠的免疫血清时,群体反应的发生不那么显著,因此在某些生物体中可以区分特异性。对这些血清进行的补体固定试验表明,有太多的群体反应,在任何生物体中都找不到特异性。然而,如果考虑到补体固定滴度,这些生物或多或少可以在明显的程度上被指定,但不足以令人满意地识别它们。在小鼠身上进行的主动和被动动物保护试验没有显示出明显的特异性,使我们能够识别出这些生物体。简单地说,可以假定某些出血性败血症菌可能具有其特异性,但由于通常无法区分的特异性,因此完全不可能区分它们。
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN HEMORRHAGIC SEPTICEMIA ORGANISMS
A number of investigations with regard to correlations usually assumed to exist between hemorrhagic septicemia organisms has hitherto been published, but it is at present yet impossible to differenciate them with distinction, as the results obtained by those who have worked with the organisms are not in agreement.Employing B. bubalisepticus, B. suisepticus, B. avisepticus and B. bovisepticus I have made some experiments in connection with these problems and came to the following conclusions:1. Morphology, growth on ordinary culture media, indol production, hemolytic property, bacteriolysis in bile, fermentation test etc. showed no satisfactory evidence as to their identification.2. No distinction could be obtained from their pathogenicity for mice, rats, guinea-pigs, rabbits and pigeons inoculated or fed with the organisms and also from the postmortem appearances of the experimental animals.3. Cross agglutination test employing an immune serum obtained from the rabbit inoculated with dead organisms showed that the correlation between the organisms is highly complicated and no specificity could be distinguished in any of them. Agglutinin absorption test gave likewise no satisfactory results, although when employed an immune serum from the guinea-pig inoculated with living organisms the occurence of group reactions was less remarkable and consequently in a certain organisms specificity could be distinguished. Complement fixation test with those sera showed there are so many group reactions that no specificity could be found in any of the organisms. If, however, the complement fixation titres were taken into consideration the organisms could be specified in more or less noticeable degree, but not satisfactory enough for the identfication of them.4. Active and passive animal protection tests with mice showed in no case so markedly a specificity as to enable us to identify the organisms.Briefly speaking, it may be assumed that some of hemorrha- gic septicemia organisms may have their specificity, but it is quite impossible to differenciate them by virtue of the specificity which is generally so undistinguished.