利用搜查令改进证据侦查

Keshav Singh, Paul Reisert, Naoya Inoue, Pride Kavumba, Kentaro Inui
{"title":"利用搜查令改进证据侦查","authors":"Keshav Singh, Paul Reisert, Naoya Inoue, Pride Kavumba, Kentaro Inui","doi":"10.18653/v1/D19-6610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recognizing the implicit link between a claim and a piece of evidence (i.e. warrant) is the key to improving the performance of evidence detection. In this work, we explore the effectiveness of automatically extracted warrants for evidence detection. Given a claim and candidate evidence, our proposed method extracts multiple warrants via similarity search from an existing, structured corpus of arguments. We then attentively aggregate the extracted warrants, considering the consistency between the given argument and the acquired warrants. Although a qualitative analysis on the warrants shows that the extraction method needs to be improved, our results indicate that our method can still improve the performance of evidence detection.","PeriodicalId":153447,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Evidence Detection by Leveraging Warrants\",\"authors\":\"Keshav Singh, Paul Reisert, Naoya Inoue, Pride Kavumba, Kentaro Inui\",\"doi\":\"10.18653/v1/D19-6610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recognizing the implicit link between a claim and a piece of evidence (i.e. warrant) is the key to improving the performance of evidence detection. In this work, we explore the effectiveness of automatically extracted warrants for evidence detection. Given a claim and candidate evidence, our proposed method extracts multiple warrants via similarity search from an existing, structured corpus of arguments. We then attentively aggregate the extracted warrants, considering the consistency between the given argument and the acquired warrants. Although a qualitative analysis on the warrants shows that the extraction method needs to be improved, our results indicate that our method can still improve the performance of evidence detection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-6610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-6610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

认识到请求权与证据(即手令)之间的隐含联系,是提高证据侦查能力的关键。在这项工作中,我们探讨了自动提取权证用于证据检测的有效性。给定索赔和候选证据,我们提出的方法通过相似性搜索从现有的结构化论点语料库中提取多个认股权证。然后,我们仔细汇总提取的权证,考虑给定论点与获得的权证之间的一致性。虽然对权证的定性分析表明提取方法有待改进,但我们的结果表明,我们的方法仍然可以提高证据检测的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Evidence Detection by Leveraging Warrants
Recognizing the implicit link between a claim and a piece of evidence (i.e. warrant) is the key to improving the performance of evidence detection. In this work, we explore the effectiveness of automatically extracted warrants for evidence detection. Given a claim and candidate evidence, our proposed method extracts multiple warrants via similarity search from an existing, structured corpus of arguments. We then attentively aggregate the extracted warrants, considering the consistency between the given argument and the acquired warrants. Although a qualitative analysis on the warrants shows that the extraction method needs to be improved, our results indicate that our method can still improve the performance of evidence detection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信