自主系统动态保证的风险感知场景采样

Shreyas Ramakrishna, Baiting Luo, Yogesh D. Barve, G. Karsai, A. Dubey
{"title":"自主系统动态保证的风险感知场景采样","authors":"Shreyas Ramakrishna, Baiting Luo, Yogesh D. Barve, G. Karsai, A. Dubey","doi":"10.1109/ICAA52185.2022.00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems must often operate under uncertainties like sensor degradation and shifts in the operating conditions, which increases its operational risk. Dynamic Assurance of these systems requires designing runtime safety components like Out-of-Distribution detectors and risk estimators, which require labeled data from different operating modes of the system that belong to scenes with adverse operating conditions, sensors, and actuator faults. Collecting real-world data of these scenes can be expensive and sometimes not feasible. So, scenario description languages with samplers like random and grid search are available to generate synthetic data from simulators, replicating these real-world scenes. However, we point out three limitations in using these conventional samplers. First, they are passive samplers, which do not use the feedback of previous results in the sampling process. Second, the variables to be sampled may have constraints that are often not included. Third, they do not balance the tradeoff between exploration and exploitation, which we hypothesize is necessary for better search space coverage. We present a scene generation approach with two samplers called Random Neighborhood Search (RNS) and Guided Bayesian Optimization (GBO), which extend the conventional random search and Bayesian Optimization search to include the limitations. Also, to facilitate the samplers, we use a risk-based metric that evaluates how risky the scene was for the system. We demonstrate our approach using an Autonomous Vehicle example in CARLA simulation. To evaluate our samplers, we compared them against the baselines of random search, grid search, and Halton sequence search. Our samplers of RNS and GBO sampled a higher percentage of high-risk scenes of 83% and 92%, compared to 56% 66% and 71% of the grid, random and Halton samplers, respectively.","PeriodicalId":206047,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Assured Autonomy (ICAA)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk-Aware Scene Sampling for Dynamic Assurance of Autonomous Systems\",\"authors\":\"Shreyas Ramakrishna, Baiting Luo, Yogesh D. Barve, G. Karsai, A. Dubey\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICAA52185.2022.00022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems must often operate under uncertainties like sensor degradation and shifts in the operating conditions, which increases its operational risk. Dynamic Assurance of these systems requires designing runtime safety components like Out-of-Distribution detectors and risk estimators, which require labeled data from different operating modes of the system that belong to scenes with adverse operating conditions, sensors, and actuator faults. Collecting real-world data of these scenes can be expensive and sometimes not feasible. So, scenario description languages with samplers like random and grid search are available to generate synthetic data from simulators, replicating these real-world scenes. However, we point out three limitations in using these conventional samplers. First, they are passive samplers, which do not use the feedback of previous results in the sampling process. Second, the variables to be sampled may have constraints that are often not included. Third, they do not balance the tradeoff between exploration and exploitation, which we hypothesize is necessary for better search space coverage. We present a scene generation approach with two samplers called Random Neighborhood Search (RNS) and Guided Bayesian Optimization (GBO), which extend the conventional random search and Bayesian Optimization search to include the limitations. Also, to facilitate the samplers, we use a risk-based metric that evaluates how risky the scene was for the system. We demonstrate our approach using an Autonomous Vehicle example in CARLA simulation. To evaluate our samplers, we compared them against the baselines of random search, grid search, and Halton sequence search. Our samplers of RNS and GBO sampled a higher percentage of high-risk scenes of 83% and 92%, compared to 56% 66% and 71% of the grid, random and Halton samplers, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Assured Autonomy (ICAA)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Assured Autonomy (ICAA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAA52185.2022.00022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Assured Autonomy (ICAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAA52185.2022.00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

自主信息物理系统必须经常在不确定的情况下运行,如传感器退化和运行条件的变化,这增加了其运行风险。这些系统的动态保证需要设计运行时安全组件,如out - distribution检测器和风险评估器,这些组件需要来自系统不同运行模式的标记数据,这些数据属于具有不利运行条件、传感器和执行器故障的场景。收集这些场景的真实数据可能非常昂贵,有时甚至不可行。因此,带有随机和网格搜索等采样器的场景描述语言可用于从模拟器生成合成数据,复制这些真实世界的场景。然而,我们指出了使用这些传统采样器的三个限制。首先,它们是被动采样器,在采样过程中不使用先前结果的反馈。其次,要采样的变量可能具有通常不包括在内的约束。第三,它们没有平衡探索和利用之间的权衡,我们假设这是更好的搜索空间覆盖所必需的。本文提出了一种基于随机邻域搜索(RNS)和引导贝叶斯优化(GBO)的场景生成方法,该方法扩展了传统的随机搜索和贝叶斯优化搜索的局限性。此外,为了方便采样,我们使用基于风险的度量来评估场景对系统的风险程度。我们使用CARLA仿真中的自动驾驶汽车示例来演示我们的方法。为了评估我们的样本,我们将它们与随机搜索、网格搜索和Halton序列搜索的基线进行了比较。我们的RNS和GBO采样器对高风险场景的采样率分别为83%和92%,而网格采样器、随机采样器和Halton采样器的采样率分别为56%、66%和71%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk-Aware Scene Sampling for Dynamic Assurance of Autonomous Systems
Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems must often operate under uncertainties like sensor degradation and shifts in the operating conditions, which increases its operational risk. Dynamic Assurance of these systems requires designing runtime safety components like Out-of-Distribution detectors and risk estimators, which require labeled data from different operating modes of the system that belong to scenes with adverse operating conditions, sensors, and actuator faults. Collecting real-world data of these scenes can be expensive and sometimes not feasible. So, scenario description languages with samplers like random and grid search are available to generate synthetic data from simulators, replicating these real-world scenes. However, we point out three limitations in using these conventional samplers. First, they are passive samplers, which do not use the feedback of previous results in the sampling process. Second, the variables to be sampled may have constraints that are often not included. Third, they do not balance the tradeoff between exploration and exploitation, which we hypothesize is necessary for better search space coverage. We present a scene generation approach with two samplers called Random Neighborhood Search (RNS) and Guided Bayesian Optimization (GBO), which extend the conventional random search and Bayesian Optimization search to include the limitations. Also, to facilitate the samplers, we use a risk-based metric that evaluates how risky the scene was for the system. We demonstrate our approach using an Autonomous Vehicle example in CARLA simulation. To evaluate our samplers, we compared them against the baselines of random search, grid search, and Halton sequence search. Our samplers of RNS and GBO sampled a higher percentage of high-risk scenes of 83% and 92%, compared to 56% 66% and 71% of the grid, random and Halton samplers, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信