{"title":"因为IT是值得的[战略投资回报率]","authors":"D. Bradbury","doi":"10.1049/INP:20070607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IT departments faced both good and bad news in 2007. The good news was that their budgets were on the rise. The bad news is that they have to work harder for the money, having lost more traction with the board. Too often the underdog in the enterprise pecking order, the IT function needs to get an image makeover so it can unleash its contribution to the bottom line. We are seeing very little discussion around turning risk management into topline benefits right now.","PeriodicalId":144906,"journal":{"name":"Information Professional","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Because IT is worth it [Strategy ROI]\",\"authors\":\"D. Bradbury\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/INP:20070607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IT departments faced both good and bad news in 2007. The good news was that their budgets were on the rise. The bad news is that they have to work harder for the money, having lost more traction with the board. Too often the underdog in the enterprise pecking order, the IT function needs to get an image makeover so it can unleash its contribution to the bottom line. We are seeing very little discussion around turning risk management into topline benefits right now.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Professional\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Professional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/INP:20070607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Professional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/INP:20070607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
IT departments faced both good and bad news in 2007. The good news was that their budgets were on the rise. The bad news is that they have to work harder for the money, having lost more traction with the board. Too often the underdog in the enterprise pecking order, the IT function needs to get an image makeover so it can unleash its contribution to the bottom line. We are seeing very little discussion around turning risk management into topline benefits right now.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
