评估在预防性维护期间使用的克隆检测工具

Proceedings. Second IEEE International Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation Pub Date : 2002-10-01 DOI:10.1109/SCAM.2002.1134103

E. Burd, J. Bailey

{"title":"评估在预防性维护期间使用的克隆检测工具","authors":"E. Burd, J. Bailey","doi":"10.1109/SCAM.2002.1134103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the results of a process whereby the detection capability of 5 code replication detection tools for large software application are evaluated. Specifically this work focuses on the benefits of identification for preventative maintenance that is with the aim to remove some of the identified clones from the source code. A number of requirements are therefore identified upon which the tools are evaluated. The results of the analysis processes show that each tool has its own strengths and weaknesses and no single tool is able to identify all clones within the code. The paper proposes that it may be possible to use a combination of tools to perform the analysis process providing that adequate means of efficiently identifying false matches is found.","PeriodicalId":301735,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Second IEEE International Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"171","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating clone detection tools for use during preventative maintenance\",\"authors\":\"E. Burd, J. Bailey\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SCAM.2002.1134103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes the results of a process whereby the detection capability of 5 code replication detection tools for large software application are evaluated. Specifically this work focuses on the benefits of identification for preventative maintenance that is with the aim to remove some of the identified clones from the source code. A number of requirements are therefore identified upon which the tools are evaluated. The results of the analysis processes show that each tool has its own strengths and weaknesses and no single tool is able to identify all clones within the code. The paper proposes that it may be possible to use a combination of tools to perform the analysis process providing that adequate means of efficiently identifying false matches is found.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Second IEEE International Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"171\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Second IEEE International Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCAM.2002.1134103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Second IEEE International Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCAM.2002.1134103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 171

摘要

本文描述了一个过程的结果，在此过程中评估了5种代码复制检测工具对大型软件应用程序的检测能力。具体地说，这项工作集中于标识对预防性维护的好处，其目的是从源代码中删除一些已标识的克隆。因此，确定了许多需求，并根据这些需求对工具进行评估。分析过程的结果表明，每个工具都有自己的优点和缺点，没有一个工具能够识别代码中的所有克隆。本文提出，如果找到了有效识别错误匹配的足够手段，则可以使用组合工具来执行分析过程。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evaluating clone detection tools for use during preventative maintenance

This paper describes the results of a process whereby the detection capability of 5 code replication detection tools for large software application are evaluated. Specifically this work focuses on the benefits of identification for preventative maintenance that is with the aim to remove some of the identified clones from the source code. A number of requirements are therefore identified upon which the tools are evaluated. The results of the analysis processes show that each tool has its own strengths and weaknesses and no single tool is able to identify all clones within the code. The paper proposes that it may be possible to use a combination of tools to perform the analysis process providing that adequate means of efficiently identifying false matches is found.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings. Second IEEE International Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation

自引率

0.00%

发文量