Icann域名争议解决系统作为解决互联网上其他知识产权争议的模式*

A. Christie
{"title":"Icann域名争议解决系统作为解决互联网上其他知识产权争议的模式*","authors":"A. Christie","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.319201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a introductory consideration of the extent to which the domain name dispute resolution system of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (\"ICANN\") - which implements and enforces the ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (\"UDRP\") - provides a useful model for the resolution of other intellectual property disputes that arise through the use of the Internet. It starts with a brief description of the development and implementation of the UDRP, and of the experience since its adoption by ICANN. The article then proceeds to explain the reasons for the effectiveness of the ICANN domain name dispute resolution system, and the key actors and entities that comprise that system. The conceptual equivalent of those actors and entities in a generalized regulated technical infrastructure are then determined by extrapolation. The reasons for the effectiveness of the ICANN system - the uniform application of the UDRP to all potential transgressors, and the automatic execution of an effective remedy against proven transgressors - are discussed as well as how this remedy can have the secondary effect of the removal of the transgressor's presence on the Internet under the domain name in issue. There is no reason why, as a matter of practical necessity, the availability of this remedy need be limited to the type of conduct currently prohibited in the UDRP - i.e. bad faith registration and use of a domain name that is the same or confusingly similar to another person's trademark or service mark. It is conceivable that other conduct which infringes on the rights of an intellectual property owner could be treated as giving rise to such a remedy. Accordingly, the ICANN domain name dispute resolution system does, in theory at least, have the potential to provide a model for the resolution of disputes concerning misuse on the Internet of other intellectual property.","PeriodicalId":368661,"journal":{"name":"University of Melbourne Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Icann Domain Name Dispute Resolution System as a Model for Resolving Other Intellectual Property Disputes on the Internet*\",\"authors\":\"A. Christie\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.319201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides a introductory consideration of the extent to which the domain name dispute resolution system of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (\\\"ICANN\\\") - which implements and enforces the ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (\\\"UDRP\\\") - provides a useful model for the resolution of other intellectual property disputes that arise through the use of the Internet. It starts with a brief description of the development and implementation of the UDRP, and of the experience since its adoption by ICANN. The article then proceeds to explain the reasons for the effectiveness of the ICANN domain name dispute resolution system, and the key actors and entities that comprise that system. The conceptual equivalent of those actors and entities in a generalized regulated technical infrastructure are then determined by extrapolation. The reasons for the effectiveness of the ICANN system - the uniform application of the UDRP to all potential transgressors, and the automatic execution of an effective remedy against proven transgressors - are discussed as well as how this remedy can have the secondary effect of the removal of the transgressor's presence on the Internet under the domain name in issue. There is no reason why, as a matter of practical necessity, the availability of this remedy need be limited to the type of conduct currently prohibited in the UDRP - i.e. bad faith registration and use of a domain name that is the same or confusingly similar to another person's trademark or service mark. It is conceivable that other conduct which infringes on the rights of an intellectual property owner could be treated as giving rise to such a remedy. Accordingly, the ICANN domain name dispute resolution system does, in theory at least, have the potential to provide a model for the resolution of disputes concerning misuse on the Internet of other intellectual property.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Melbourne Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Melbourne Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.319201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Melbourne Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.319201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文对互联网名称与数字地址分配机构(“ICANN”)的域名争议解决系统(该系统实施并执行ICANN统一域名争议解决政策(“UDRP”))在多大程度上为解决因使用互联网而产生的其他知识产权争议提供了一个有用的模型进行了介绍性考虑。本文首先简要介绍了UDRP的制定和实施,以及自UDRP被ICANN采用以来的经验。文章接着解释了ICANN域名争议解决系统的有效性的原因,以及组成该系统的关键行为者和实体。在一般规范的技术基础设施中,这些参与者和实体的概念等效然后通过外推确定。讨论了ICANN系统有效的原因——UDRP统一适用于所有潜在的违规者,以及对已证实的违规者自动执行有效的补救措施——以及这种补救措施如何产生次要效果,即在争议域名下删除违规者在互联网上的存在。没有理由认为,作为实际需要,这种补救措施的可用性必须限于UDRP目前所禁止的行为类型,即恶意注册和使用与他人的商标或服务标志相同或混淆性相似的域名。可以想象,侵犯知识产权所有人权利的其他行为可以被视为产生这种补救办法。因此,至少在理论上,ICANN域名争议解决系统确实有可能为解决互联网上滥用其他知识产权的争议提供一种模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Icann Domain Name Dispute Resolution System as a Model for Resolving Other Intellectual Property Disputes on the Internet*
This article provides a introductory consideration of the extent to which the domain name dispute resolution system of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ("ICANN") - which implements and enforces the ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ("UDRP") - provides a useful model for the resolution of other intellectual property disputes that arise through the use of the Internet. It starts with a brief description of the development and implementation of the UDRP, and of the experience since its adoption by ICANN. The article then proceeds to explain the reasons for the effectiveness of the ICANN domain name dispute resolution system, and the key actors and entities that comprise that system. The conceptual equivalent of those actors and entities in a generalized regulated technical infrastructure are then determined by extrapolation. The reasons for the effectiveness of the ICANN system - the uniform application of the UDRP to all potential transgressors, and the automatic execution of an effective remedy against proven transgressors - are discussed as well as how this remedy can have the secondary effect of the removal of the transgressor's presence on the Internet under the domain name in issue. There is no reason why, as a matter of practical necessity, the availability of this remedy need be limited to the type of conduct currently prohibited in the UDRP - i.e. bad faith registration and use of a domain name that is the same or confusingly similar to another person's trademark or service mark. It is conceivable that other conduct which infringes on the rights of an intellectual property owner could be treated as giving rise to such a remedy. Accordingly, the ICANN domain name dispute resolution system does, in theory at least, have the potential to provide a model for the resolution of disputes concerning misuse on the Internet of other intellectual property.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信