外科加護病房內使用紅血球血品之原因分析與改善方案

楊茜淳 楊茜淳, 施威祥 Chien-Chun Yang, Emily Lo Wei-Hsiang Shih, 羅崇杰 Emily Lo
{"title":"外科加護病房內使用紅血球血品之原因分析與改善方案","authors":"楊茜淳 楊茜淳, 施威祥 Chien-Chun Yang, Emily Lo Wei-Hsiang Shih, 羅崇杰 Emily Lo","doi":"10.53106/181020932022032001001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 背景與目的:雖然許多醫學會都有發表如何正確使用紅血球的血品的照顧指引,然而,臨床醫師決定輸血的動機,常是根據個人的喜好,或是多年類累積的經驗而非實證醫學。因此,本研究的宗旨是探討外科加護病房病人的輸血適應症是否遵循這些照顧指引,同時分析輸血的正確與合適性是否影響病人的臨床結果,與探討造成不正確輸血的因素,以達到持續提升病人照顧品質。研究方法:本研究收納在2015年7月至2016年6月中入住成人外科加護病房之病人,組成一個專家小組依回顧性的方式評估加護病房住院期間所有使用紅血球血品的適當性,並比較輸血的正確性與非正確性的兩組病人的背景資料及臨床結果。研究結果:研究期間共有617名病人入住外科加護病房,其中245名(39.7%)病人接受了紅血球血品。比起沒有手術的病人,較多的術後病人有接受輸血(87.3% vs. 75.8%),同時輸血的病人有較高的APACHE II 分數(22.1 ± 8.5 vs. 15.5 ± 7.4),更長的加護病房的住院天數(8.0 ± 9.1 vs. 3.0 ± 3.7天),與較高的加護病房死亡率(14.3% vs. 6.2%)。在651次輸血當中,有38.4%符合適應症,但61.6%則未符合適應症。手術後在外科加護病房接受輸血的病人有顯著較高的比率病人在手術當中失血超過500 C.C. (P<0.05)。結論:目前醫院的努力措施仍無法有效的減少外科加護病房不必要的使用紅血球血品。除了持續加強教導醫護人員正確的使用血品之外,其他的方法例如強化資訊系統的提示與阻擋功能,也都是重要的努力方向。\n Objectives: Despite the fact that many published guidelines for optimal usage of blood products are available, RBC transfusions are frequently guided by personal preference and tradition. The purpose of the study was to examine the appropriateness of RBC transfusions for surgical patients admitted to the SICU and how it might affect the clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all RBC transfusions that occurred in a general SICU between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016. Each RBC transfusion was critically ap-praised using four criteria to determine whether or not the transfusion was indicated. De-mographic data and clinical outcome measures of transfused and non-transfused patients as well as patients with indicated or non-indicated RBC transfusions were compared. Results: There were 617 patients admitted to the SICU and 245 (39.7%) of them required RBC transfusions. Transfused patients were more likely to have had operations prior to ICU ad-mission (87.3% vs. 75.8%) and have higher APACHE II scores (22.1 ± 8.5 vs. 15.5 ± 7.4). They also had longer ICU stays (8.0 ± 9.1 vs. 3.0 ± 3.7 days) and higher ICU mortality rates (14.3% vs. 6.2%). Among 651 transfusions, 38.4% of them fulfilled at least one crite-rion for transfusion and 61.6% were not considered appropriate. Patients who had non-indicated postoperative RBC transfusion were more likely to have had intraoperative blood loss ≥ 500 mL (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our efforts to reduce unnecessary RBC transfusion in the SICU appear inadequate. Educating medical personnel is important, but additional measures should also be taken in order to improve compliance.\n \n","PeriodicalId":188376,"journal":{"name":"輔仁醫學期刊","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"外科加護病房內使用紅血球血品之原因分析與改善方案\",\"authors\":\"楊茜淳 楊茜淳, 施威祥 Chien-Chun Yang, Emily Lo Wei-Hsiang Shih, 羅崇杰 Emily Lo\",\"doi\":\"10.53106/181020932022032001001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n 背景與目的:雖然許多醫學會都有發表如何正確使用紅血球的血品的照顧指引,然而,臨床醫師決定輸血的動機,常是根據個人的喜好,或是多年類累積的經驗而非實證醫學。因此,本研究的宗旨是探討外科加護病房病人的輸血適應症是否遵循這些照顧指引,同時分析輸血的正確與合適性是否影響病人的臨床結果,與探討造成不正確輸血的因素,以達到持續提升病人照顧品質。研究方法:本研究收納在2015年7月至2016年6月中入住成人外科加護病房之病人,組成一個專家小組依回顧性的方式評估加護病房住院期間所有使用紅血球血品的適當性,並比較輸血的正確性與非正確性的兩組病人的背景資料及臨床結果。研究結果:研究期間共有617名病人入住外科加護病房,其中245名(39.7%)病人接受了紅血球血品。比起沒有手術的病人,較多的術後病人有接受輸血(87.3% vs. 75.8%),同時輸血的病人有較高的APACHE II 分數(22.1 ± 8.5 vs. 15.5 ± 7.4),更長的加護病房的住院天數(8.0 ± 9.1 vs. 3.0 ± 3.7天),與較高的加護病房死亡率(14.3% vs. 6.2%)。在651次輸血當中,有38.4%符合適應症,但61.6%則未符合適應症。手術後在外科加護病房接受輸血的病人有顯著較高的比率病人在手術當中失血超過500 C.C. (P<0.05)。結論:目前醫院的努力措施仍無法有效的減少外科加護病房不必要的使用紅血球血品。除了持續加強教導醫護人員正確的使用血品之外,其他的方法例如強化資訊系統的提示與阻擋功能,也都是重要的努力方向。\\n Objectives: Despite the fact that many published guidelines for optimal usage of blood products are available, RBC transfusions are frequently guided by personal preference and tradition. The purpose of the study was to examine the appropriateness of RBC transfusions for surgical patients admitted to the SICU and how it might affect the clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all RBC transfusions that occurred in a general SICU between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016. Each RBC transfusion was critically ap-praised using four criteria to determine whether or not the transfusion was indicated. De-mographic data and clinical outcome measures of transfused and non-transfused patients as well as patients with indicated or non-indicated RBC transfusions were compared. Results: There were 617 patients admitted to the SICU and 245 (39.7%) of them required RBC transfusions. Transfused patients were more likely to have had operations prior to ICU ad-mission (87.3% vs. 75.8%) and have higher APACHE II scores (22.1 ± 8.5 vs. 15.5 ± 7.4). They also had longer ICU stays (8.0 ± 9.1 vs. 3.0 ± 3.7 days) and higher ICU mortality rates (14.3% vs. 6.2%). Among 651 transfusions, 38.4% of them fulfilled at least one crite-rion for transfusion and 61.6% were not considered appropriate. Patients who had non-indicated postoperative RBC transfusion were more likely to have had intraoperative blood loss ≥ 500 mL (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our efforts to reduce unnecessary RBC transfusion in the SICU appear inadequate. Educating medical personnel is important, but additional measures should also be taken in order to improve compliance.\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":188376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"輔仁醫學期刊\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"輔仁醫學期刊\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53106/181020932022032001001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"輔仁醫學期刊","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/181020932022032001001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:虽然许多医学会都有发表如何正确使用红血球的血品的照顾指引,然而,临床医师决定输血的动机,常是根据个人的喜好,或是多年类累积的经验而非实证医学。因此,本研究的宗旨是探讨外科加护病房病人的输血适应症是否遵循这些照顾指引,同时分析输血的正确与合适性是否影响病人的临床结果,与探讨造成不正确输血的因素,以达到持续提升病人照顾品质。研究方法:本研究收纳在2015年7月至2016年6月中入住成人外科加护病房之病人,组成一个专家小组依回顾性的方式评估加护病房住院期间所有使用红血球血品的适当性,并比较输血的正确性与非正确性的两组病人的背景资料及临床结果。研究结果:研究期间共有617名病人入住外科加护病房,其中245名(39.7%)病人接受了红血球血品。比起没有手术的病人,较多的术后病人有接受输血(87.3% vs. 75.8%),同时输血的病人有较高的APACHE II 分数(22.1 ± 8.5 vs. 15.5 ± 7.4),更长的加护病房的住院天数(8.0 ± 9.1 vs. 3.0 ± 3.7天),与较高的加护病房死亡率(14.3% vs. 6.2%)。在651次输血当中,有38.4%符合适应症,但61.6%则未符合适应症。手术后在外科加护病房接受输血的病人有显著较高的比率病人在手术当中失血超过500 C.C. (P<0.05)。结论:目前医院的努力措施仍无法有效的减少外科加护病房不必要的使用红血球血品。除了持续加强教导医护人员正确的使用血品之外,其他的方法例如强化资讯系统的提示与阻挡功能,也都是重要的努力方向。 Objectives: Despite the fact that many published guidelines for optimal usage of blood products are available, RBC transfusions are frequently guided by personal preference and tradition. The purpose of the study was to examine the appropriateness of RBC transfusions for surgical patients admitted to the SICU and how it might affect the clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all RBC transfusions that occurred in a general SICU between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016. Each RBC transfusion was critically ap-praised using four criteria to determine whether or not the transfusion was indicated. De-mographic data and clinical outcome measures of transfused and non-transfused patients as well as patients with indicated or non-indicated RBC transfusions were compared. Results: There were 617 patients admitted to the SICU and 245 (39.7%) of them required RBC transfusions. Transfused patients were more likely to have had operations prior to ICU ad-mission (87.3% vs. 75.8%) and have higher APACHE II scores (22.1 ± 8.5 vs. 15.5 ± 7.4). They also had longer ICU stays (8.0 ± 9.1 vs. 3.0 ± 3.7 days) and higher ICU mortality rates (14.3% vs. 6.2%). Among 651 transfusions, 38.4% of them fulfilled at least one crite-rion for transfusion and 61.6% were not considered appropriate. Patients who had non-indicated postoperative RBC transfusion were more likely to have had intraoperative blood loss ≥ 500 mL (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our efforts to reduce unnecessary RBC transfusion in the SICU appear inadequate. Educating medical personnel is important, but additional measures should also be taken in order to improve compliance.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
外科加護病房內使用紅血球血品之原因分析與改善方案
背景與目的:雖然許多醫學會都有發表如何正確使用紅血球的血品的照顧指引,然而,臨床醫師決定輸血的動機,常是根據個人的喜好,或是多年類累積的經驗而非實證醫學。因此,本研究的宗旨是探討外科加護病房病人的輸血適應症是否遵循這些照顧指引,同時分析輸血的正確與合適性是否影響病人的臨床結果,與探討造成不正確輸血的因素,以達到持續提升病人照顧品質。研究方法:本研究收納在2015年7月至2016年6月中入住成人外科加護病房之病人,組成一個專家小組依回顧性的方式評估加護病房住院期間所有使用紅血球血品的適當性,並比較輸血的正確性與非正確性的兩組病人的背景資料及臨床結果。研究結果:研究期間共有617名病人入住外科加護病房,其中245名(39.7%)病人接受了紅血球血品。比起沒有手術的病人,較多的術後病人有接受輸血(87.3% vs. 75.8%),同時輸血的病人有較高的APACHE II 分數(22.1 ± 8.5 vs. 15.5 ± 7.4),更長的加護病房的住院天數(8.0 ± 9.1 vs. 3.0 ± 3.7天),與較高的加護病房死亡率(14.3% vs. 6.2%)。在651次輸血當中,有38.4%符合適應症,但61.6%則未符合適應症。手術後在外科加護病房接受輸血的病人有顯著較高的比率病人在手術當中失血超過500 C.C. (P<0.05)。結論:目前醫院的努力措施仍無法有效的減少外科加護病房不必要的使用紅血球血品。除了持續加強教導醫護人員正確的使用血品之外,其他的方法例如強化資訊系統的提示與阻擋功能,也都是重要的努力方向。  Objectives: Despite the fact that many published guidelines for optimal usage of blood products are available, RBC transfusions are frequently guided by personal preference and tradition. The purpose of the study was to examine the appropriateness of RBC transfusions for surgical patients admitted to the SICU and how it might affect the clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all RBC transfusions that occurred in a general SICU between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016. Each RBC transfusion was critically ap-praised using four criteria to determine whether or not the transfusion was indicated. De-mographic data and clinical outcome measures of transfused and non-transfused patients as well as patients with indicated or non-indicated RBC transfusions were compared. Results: There were 617 patients admitted to the SICU and 245 (39.7%) of them required RBC transfusions. Transfused patients were more likely to have had operations prior to ICU ad-mission (87.3% vs. 75.8%) and have higher APACHE II scores (22.1 ± 8.5 vs. 15.5 ± 7.4). They also had longer ICU stays (8.0 ± 9.1 vs. 3.0 ± 3.7 days) and higher ICU mortality rates (14.3% vs. 6.2%). Among 651 transfusions, 38.4% of them fulfilled at least one crite-rion for transfusion and 61.6% were not considered appropriate. Patients who had non-indicated postoperative RBC transfusion were more likely to have had intraoperative blood loss ≥ 500 mL (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our efforts to reduce unnecessary RBC transfusion in the SICU appear inadequate. Educating medical personnel is important, but additional measures should also be taken in order to improve compliance.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信