在 "城市为老年人服务 "项目中应用行为改变轮框架制定干预措施

A. Direito, S. Michie, C. Lefevre, Emilly I M. Collins
{"title":"在 \"城市为老年人服务 \"项目中应用行为改变轮框架制定干预措施","authors":"A. Direito, S. Michie, C. Lefevre, Emilly I M. Collins","doi":"10.23919/SOFTCOM.2017.8115507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The probability of an intervention being effective is likely increased if it is designed following a behavioural analysis and with the aid of evidence-based intervention frameworks. For example, the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) framework and its associated COM-B model of behaviour have been used successfully as a starting point for designing behaviour change interventions. However, the BCW framework can also be applied at a later stage in the design process, such as when an intervention has been designed but before it is deployed. Here we describe the application of the BCW framework and COM-B model to evaluate and refine already designed interventions. We use a multidisciplinary multi-site project (‘City4Age’) as a case study. The project aims to promote independent living of older adults through the deployment of interventions using wearable and environment-based technology. We conducted face-to-face interviews with site representatives to identify the target behaviours, perceived barriers and facilitators, intervention functions, and modes of delivery for each planned intervention. Additionally, literature reviews were conducted to identify evidence-based facilitators and barriers for each targeted behaviour. Subsequently, we 1) compared the intervention functions proposed by the project-sites with those most likely to be effective according to the BCW; and 2) assessed the congruency of the barriers and facilitators identified by the pilot-sites with those identified in the literature. For five planned interventions across two project-sites (Birmingham and Singapore), two had intervention functions unlikely to be effective according to the BCW. The two planned interventions to promote social engagement did not address barriers or facilitators evident in the literature, indicating they required refinement. Applying the BCW framework allowed to identify which interventions needed refining. It also helped in providing specific guidance in our recommendations for improvements prior to deployment.","PeriodicalId":189860,"journal":{"name":"2017 25th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of the behaviour change wheel framework to the development of interventions within the City4Age project\",\"authors\":\"A. Direito, S. Michie, C. Lefevre, Emilly I M. Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/SOFTCOM.2017.8115507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The probability of an intervention being effective is likely increased if it is designed following a behavioural analysis and with the aid of evidence-based intervention frameworks. For example, the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) framework and its associated COM-B model of behaviour have been used successfully as a starting point for designing behaviour change interventions. However, the BCW framework can also be applied at a later stage in the design process, such as when an intervention has been designed but before it is deployed. Here we describe the application of the BCW framework and COM-B model to evaluate and refine already designed interventions. We use a multidisciplinary multi-site project (‘City4Age’) as a case study. The project aims to promote independent living of older adults through the deployment of interventions using wearable and environment-based technology. We conducted face-to-face interviews with site representatives to identify the target behaviours, perceived barriers and facilitators, intervention functions, and modes of delivery for each planned intervention. Additionally, literature reviews were conducted to identify evidence-based facilitators and barriers for each targeted behaviour. Subsequently, we 1) compared the intervention functions proposed by the project-sites with those most likely to be effective according to the BCW; and 2) assessed the congruency of the barriers and facilitators identified by the pilot-sites with those identified in the literature. For five planned interventions across two project-sites (Birmingham and Singapore), two had intervention functions unlikely to be effective according to the BCW. The two planned interventions to promote social engagement did not address barriers or facilitators evident in the literature, indicating they required refinement. Applying the BCW framework allowed to identify which interventions needed refining. It also helped in providing specific guidance in our recommendations for improvements prior to deployment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 25th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 25th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/SOFTCOM.2017.8115507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 25th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/SOFTCOM.2017.8115507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

如果干预措施是在行为分析和循证干预框架的帮助下设计的,那么干预措施有效的可能性就会增加。例如,行为改变轮(BCW)框架及其相关的 COM-B 行为模型已被成功地用作设计行为改变干预措施的起点。不过,BCW 框架也可以应用于设计过程的后期阶段,比如干预措施已经设计完成但尚未部署的阶段。在此,我们将介绍如何应用业连管框架和 COM-B 模型来评估和完善已经设计好的干预措施。我们以一个多学科多地点项目("City4Age")为案例进行研究。该项目旨在通过部署使用可穿戴和基于环境的技术的干预措施,促进老年人的独立生活。我们与现场代表进行了面对面访谈,以确定目标行为、感知障碍和促进因素、干预功能以及每项计划干预的实施模式。此外,我们还进行了文献综述,以确定每种目标行为的循证促进因素和障碍。随后,我们:1)比较了项目点提出的干预功能与《巴塞尔公约》规定的最有可能有效的干预功能;2)评估了试点点确定的障碍和促进因素与文献中确定的障碍和促进因素的一致性。在两个项目点(伯明翰和新加坡)的五项计划干预中,有两项的干预功能根据《生物多样性公约》不可能有效。为促进社会参与而计划的两项干预措施没有解决文献中明显存在的障碍或促进因素,这表明它们需要改进。应用《巴塞尔公约》框架可以确定哪些干预措施需要改进。它还有助于为我们在部署前提出改进建议提供具体指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of the behaviour change wheel framework to the development of interventions within the City4Age project
The probability of an intervention being effective is likely increased if it is designed following a behavioural analysis and with the aid of evidence-based intervention frameworks. For example, the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) framework and its associated COM-B model of behaviour have been used successfully as a starting point for designing behaviour change interventions. However, the BCW framework can also be applied at a later stage in the design process, such as when an intervention has been designed but before it is deployed. Here we describe the application of the BCW framework and COM-B model to evaluate and refine already designed interventions. We use a multidisciplinary multi-site project (‘City4Age’) as a case study. The project aims to promote independent living of older adults through the deployment of interventions using wearable and environment-based technology. We conducted face-to-face interviews with site representatives to identify the target behaviours, perceived barriers and facilitators, intervention functions, and modes of delivery for each planned intervention. Additionally, literature reviews were conducted to identify evidence-based facilitators and barriers for each targeted behaviour. Subsequently, we 1) compared the intervention functions proposed by the project-sites with those most likely to be effective according to the BCW; and 2) assessed the congruency of the barriers and facilitators identified by the pilot-sites with those identified in the literature. For five planned interventions across two project-sites (Birmingham and Singapore), two had intervention functions unlikely to be effective according to the BCW. The two planned interventions to promote social engagement did not address barriers or facilitators evident in the literature, indicating they required refinement. Applying the BCW framework allowed to identify which interventions needed refining. It also helped in providing specific guidance in our recommendations for improvements prior to deployment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信