康德,纯洁与魔鬼

Bysshe Inigo Coffey
{"title":"康德,纯洁与魔鬼","authors":"Bysshe Inigo Coffey","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9781800855380.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is in the Alastor volume of 1816 that Shelley’s quarrel with Wordsworth as a lost moral leader emerges for the first time. Chapter 5 turns to Peter Bell the Third, Shelley’s satire on Wordsworth, and relates the moral death-in-life of Peter Bell to Shelley’s revulsion against the wish to remain unchangeably as we are, as previously discussed in Chapter 2. This chapter revisits a question that has perplexed certain Shelley critics: did Shelley actually read Kant? The chapter supplies an answer to the question. Under the name of Bell, Wordsworth appears as a Kantian disciple corrupted by an ethical system that elevates, as the fundamental principle of moral action, duty above sympathy or the pursuit of happiness.","PeriodicalId":134914,"journal":{"name":"Shelley's Broken World","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kant, Purity, and the Devil\",\"authors\":\"Bysshe Inigo Coffey\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/liverpool/9781800855380.003.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is in the Alastor volume of 1816 that Shelley’s quarrel with Wordsworth as a lost moral leader emerges for the first time. Chapter 5 turns to Peter Bell the Third, Shelley’s satire on Wordsworth, and relates the moral death-in-life of Peter Bell to Shelley’s revulsion against the wish to remain unchangeably as we are, as previously discussed in Chapter 2. This chapter revisits a question that has perplexed certain Shelley critics: did Shelley actually read Kant? The chapter supplies an answer to the question. Under the name of Bell, Wordsworth appears as a Kantian disciple corrupted by an ethical system that elevates, as the fundamental principle of moral action, duty above sympathy or the pursuit of happiness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shelley's Broken World\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shelley's Broken World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781800855380.003.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shelley's Broken World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781800855380.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在1816年出版的《阿拉斯特卷》中,雪莱与华兹华斯作为一个迷失的道德领袖的争吵第一次出现。第五章转到《彼得·贝尔三世》,雪莱对华兹华斯的讽刺,并将彼得·贝尔的道德死亡与雪莱对保持不变的愿望的厌恶联系起来,就像之前在第二章讨论的那样。这一章重温了一个困扰某些雪莱批评家的问题:雪莱真的读过康德吗?这一章为这个问题提供了答案。在贝尔的名义下,华兹华斯以康德信徒的身份出现,他被一种道德体系所腐蚀,这种道德体系将责任提升为道德行为的基本原则,高于同情或对幸福的追求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kant, Purity, and the Devil
It is in the Alastor volume of 1816 that Shelley’s quarrel with Wordsworth as a lost moral leader emerges for the first time. Chapter 5 turns to Peter Bell the Third, Shelley’s satire on Wordsworth, and relates the moral death-in-life of Peter Bell to Shelley’s revulsion against the wish to remain unchangeably as we are, as previously discussed in Chapter 2. This chapter revisits a question that has perplexed certain Shelley critics: did Shelley actually read Kant? The chapter supplies an answer to the question. Under the name of Bell, Wordsworth appears as a Kantian disciple corrupted by an ethical system that elevates, as the fundamental principle of moral action, duty above sympathy or the pursuit of happiness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信