欧洲金融公司的估值

J. Danbolt, Bill Rees
{"title":"欧洲金融公司的估值","authors":"J. Danbolt, Bill Rees","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.289218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We extend the recent literature concerning accounting based valuation models to investigate financial firms from six European countries with substantial financial sectors: France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Switzerland and the UK. Not only are these crucial industries worthy of study in their own right, but unusual accounting practices, and inter‐country differences in those accounting practices, provide valuable insights into the accounting‐value relationship. Our sample consists of 7,714 financial firm/years observations from 1,140 companies drawn from 1989–2000. Sub‐samples include 1,309 firm/years for banks, 650 for insurance companies, 1,705 for real estate firms, and 3,239 for investment companies. In most countries we find that the valuation models work as well or better in explaining cross‐sectional variations in the market‐to‐book ratio for financial firms as they do for industrial and commercial firms in the same countries, although Switzerland is an exception to this generalization. As expected, the results are sensitive to industrial differences, accounting regulation and accounting practices. In particular, marking assets to market value reduces the relevance of earnings figures and increases that of equity.","PeriodicalId":272257,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance and Organizations eJournal","volume":"05 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Valuation of European Financial Firms\",\"authors\":\"J. Danbolt, Bill Rees\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.289218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We extend the recent literature concerning accounting based valuation models to investigate financial firms from six European countries with substantial financial sectors: France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Switzerland and the UK. Not only are these crucial industries worthy of study in their own right, but unusual accounting practices, and inter‐country differences in those accounting practices, provide valuable insights into the accounting‐value relationship. Our sample consists of 7,714 financial firm/years observations from 1,140 companies drawn from 1989–2000. Sub‐samples include 1,309 firm/years for banks, 650 for insurance companies, 1,705 for real estate firms, and 3,239 for investment companies. In most countries we find that the valuation models work as well or better in explaining cross‐sectional variations in the market‐to‐book ratio for financial firms as they do for industrial and commercial firms in the same countries, although Switzerland is an exception to this generalization. As expected, the results are sensitive to industrial differences, accounting regulation and accounting practices. In particular, marking assets to market value reduces the relevance of earnings figures and increases that of equity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Finance and Organizations eJournal\",\"volume\":\"05 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Finance and Organizations eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.289218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Finance and Organizations eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.289218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

我们扩展了最近关于基于会计的估值模型的文献,以调查来自六个具有重要金融部门的欧洲国家的金融公司:法国,德国,意大利,荷兰,瑞士和英国。不仅这些关键行业本身值得研究,而且不寻常的会计实践以及这些会计实践的国家间差异,为会计价值关系提供了有价值的见解。我们的样本包括7714家金融公司/年的观察,这些观察来自1989-2000年间的1140家公司。子样本包括银行的1,309家公司/年,保险公司的650家,房地产公司的1,705家,投资公司的3,239家。在大多数国家,我们发现估值模型在解释金融公司市净率的横截面变化方面与在同一国家的工业和商业公司一样有效,甚至更好,尽管瑞士是这种概括的例外。正如预期的那样,结果对行业差异、会计法规和会计实践很敏感。特别是,将资产按市值计价降低了收益数字的相关性,增加了权益的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Valuation of European Financial Firms
We extend the recent literature concerning accounting based valuation models to investigate financial firms from six European countries with substantial financial sectors: France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Switzerland and the UK. Not only are these crucial industries worthy of study in their own right, but unusual accounting practices, and inter‐country differences in those accounting practices, provide valuable insights into the accounting‐value relationship. Our sample consists of 7,714 financial firm/years observations from 1,140 companies drawn from 1989–2000. Sub‐samples include 1,309 firm/years for banks, 650 for insurance companies, 1,705 for real estate firms, and 3,239 for investment companies. In most countries we find that the valuation models work as well or better in explaining cross‐sectional variations in the market‐to‐book ratio for financial firms as they do for industrial and commercial firms in the same countries, although Switzerland is an exception to this generalization. As expected, the results are sensitive to industrial differences, accounting regulation and accounting practices. In particular, marking assets to market value reduces the relevance of earnings figures and increases that of equity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信