B. Varghese, Melissa Perkins, S. Cen, X. Lei, Jacquelyn Fields, J. Jamie, B. Desai, Mariam Thomas, D. Hwang, Sandy C Lee, L. Larsen, Mary W. Yamashita
{"title":"CEM放射组学用于区分浸润性乳腺癌患者的病灶与背景实质增强","authors":"B. Varghese, Melissa Perkins, S. Cen, X. Lei, Jacquelyn Fields, J. Jamie, B. Desai, Mariam Thomas, D. Hwang, Sandy C Lee, L. Larsen, Mary W. Yamashita","doi":"10.1117/12.2670371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this IRB approved retrospective study 41 women with biopsy-proven invasive breast cancers (IBC) were imaged using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), prior to any treatment. Size-matched regions of interest (ROIs) were manually contoured by an experienced breast radiologist on the CEM capturing the breast lesion and breast parenchymal enhancement (BPE), respectively. Radiomics analysis was performed using LifEx software and 109 radiomics metrics spanning 6 different texture families were extracted from each ROI. Predictive models of lesion malignancy were developed using multiple classifiers and used to subclassify breast cancers based on their hormone receptor status. The 10- fold cross validation was used to construct the decision classifier and performance was assessed. CEM radiomics models based on Random Forest, Real Adaboost, and ElasticNet classifiers achieved an AUC of 0.83, 0.82 and 0.74, respectively in discriminating malignant breast lesions from varying amounts of BPE. Accounting for the varying levels of BPE, revealed a reduction in AUC-based prediction of lesion vs. BPE as the qualitative assessment of BPE increased from minimal to moderate (AUCs of 0.89 vs 0.74). Further analyses of the IBC based on their hormone receptor status showed that triple negative breast lesions showed statistically significant differences in multiple radiomics metrics compared to ER+ PR+ HER2- and HER2+. The predicted probability of the radiomics model was significantly different across three receptor-based subtypes and between high and low nuclear grade breast cancers. CEM Radiomics demonstrated good discrimination (AUC>0.8) of malignant breast lesions despite varying BPE levels and supports breast lesion subtyping.","PeriodicalId":147201,"journal":{"name":"Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CEM radiomics for distinguishing lesion from background parenchymal enhancement in patients with invasive breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"B. Varghese, Melissa Perkins, S. Cen, X. Lei, Jacquelyn Fields, J. Jamie, B. Desai, Mariam Thomas, D. Hwang, Sandy C Lee, L. Larsen, Mary W. Yamashita\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2670371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this IRB approved retrospective study 41 women with biopsy-proven invasive breast cancers (IBC) were imaged using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), prior to any treatment. Size-matched regions of interest (ROIs) were manually contoured by an experienced breast radiologist on the CEM capturing the breast lesion and breast parenchymal enhancement (BPE), respectively. Radiomics analysis was performed using LifEx software and 109 radiomics metrics spanning 6 different texture families were extracted from each ROI. Predictive models of lesion malignancy were developed using multiple classifiers and used to subclassify breast cancers based on their hormone receptor status. The 10- fold cross validation was used to construct the decision classifier and performance was assessed. CEM radiomics models based on Random Forest, Real Adaboost, and ElasticNet classifiers achieved an AUC of 0.83, 0.82 and 0.74, respectively in discriminating malignant breast lesions from varying amounts of BPE. Accounting for the varying levels of BPE, revealed a reduction in AUC-based prediction of lesion vs. BPE as the qualitative assessment of BPE increased from minimal to moderate (AUCs of 0.89 vs 0.74). Further analyses of the IBC based on their hormone receptor status showed that triple negative breast lesions showed statistically significant differences in multiple radiomics metrics compared to ER+ PR+ HER2- and HER2+. The predicted probability of the radiomics model was significantly different across three receptor-based subtypes and between high and low nuclear grade breast cancers. CEM Radiomics demonstrated good discrimination (AUC>0.8) of malignant breast lesions despite varying BPE levels and supports breast lesion subtyping.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2670371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2670371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在这项经IRB批准的回顾性研究中,41名活检证实的浸润性乳腺癌(IBC)妇女在接受任何治疗之前使用对比增强乳房x线摄影(CEM)进行成像。大小匹配的感兴趣区域(roi)由经验丰富的乳腺放射科医生在CEM上手动绘制,分别捕获乳腺病变和乳腺实质增强(BPE)。使用LifEx软件进行放射组学分析,从每个ROI中提取了跨越6个不同纹理族的109个放射组学指标。病变恶性肿瘤的预测模型使用多个分类器,并用于根据其激素受体状态对乳腺癌进行亚分类。使用10倍交叉验证来构建决策分类器并评估其性能。基于Random Forest、Real Adaboost和ElasticNet分类器的CEM放射组学模型在区分乳腺恶性病变和不同数量的BPE方面的AUC分别为0.83、0.82和0.74。考虑到不同程度的BPE,随着BPE的定性评估从轻微到中度增加,基于auc的病变预测与BPE相比有所减少(auc为0.89 vs 0.74)。基于激素受体状态的IBC进一步分析显示,与ER+ PR+ HER2-和HER2+相比,三阴性乳腺病变在多个放射组学指标上存在统计学差异。放射组学模型的预测概率在三种基于受体的亚型以及高核级和低核级乳腺癌之间存在显著差异。尽管BPE水平不同,但CEM放射组学显示出良好的乳腺恶性病变鉴别(AUC>0.8),并支持乳腺病变亚型。
CEM radiomics for distinguishing lesion from background parenchymal enhancement in patients with invasive breast cancer
In this IRB approved retrospective study 41 women with biopsy-proven invasive breast cancers (IBC) were imaged using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), prior to any treatment. Size-matched regions of interest (ROIs) were manually contoured by an experienced breast radiologist on the CEM capturing the breast lesion and breast parenchymal enhancement (BPE), respectively. Radiomics analysis was performed using LifEx software and 109 radiomics metrics spanning 6 different texture families were extracted from each ROI. Predictive models of lesion malignancy were developed using multiple classifiers and used to subclassify breast cancers based on their hormone receptor status. The 10- fold cross validation was used to construct the decision classifier and performance was assessed. CEM radiomics models based on Random Forest, Real Adaboost, and ElasticNet classifiers achieved an AUC of 0.83, 0.82 and 0.74, respectively in discriminating malignant breast lesions from varying amounts of BPE. Accounting for the varying levels of BPE, revealed a reduction in AUC-based prediction of lesion vs. BPE as the qualitative assessment of BPE increased from minimal to moderate (AUCs of 0.89 vs 0.74). Further analyses of the IBC based on their hormone receptor status showed that triple negative breast lesions showed statistically significant differences in multiple radiomics metrics compared to ER+ PR+ HER2- and HER2+. The predicted probability of the radiomics model was significantly different across three receptor-based subtypes and between high and low nuclear grade breast cancers. CEM Radiomics demonstrated good discrimination (AUC>0.8) of malignant breast lesions despite varying BPE levels and supports breast lesion subtyping.